Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guys should evolve beyond masculinity
SFGate ^ | 10/8/06 | Robert Jensen

Posted on 10/13/2006 1:25:04 PM PDT by SeenTheLights Mom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-254 next last
To: Victoria Delsoul

Thanks for the song!


201 posted on 10/13/2006 9:47:26 PM PDT by scott7278 (The War on Terror includes defending the homefront from the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: scott7278

Nice. He's been around for a long time isn't he?


202 posted on 10/13/2006 9:51:19 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: SeenTheLights Mom

After much though the correct respoce to this is.

You want to make me.


203 posted on 10/13/2006 9:51:33 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (Real men use spell check!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank; Victoria Delsoul
Brown Noser! p_y ;)

I was going with the flow til the part about Rumsfeld ...the old war horse. Don't get me wrong now; but I believe "looking good" is the last thing on Rummy's mind. He's the salt that doesn't need the pepper. Don't know if that is a good thing or not.

Albeit, I am only playing with yas' here; and truly believe it is difficult to judge the character of a person from "fan magazines" or the scripted roles they play in films or even on the grandiose stage of all -- Capitol Hill!

Compartmentalization of others could result in a missed opportunity to know someone who may have a lot of happiness to offer.

Have a good evening,
F_T_D

204 posted on 10/13/2006 9:52:00 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
LOL.

Of course, there's always the best cowboy of 'em all . . .

;-)

205 posted on 10/13/2006 9:56:11 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: radiohead
The words just flow together, don't they?

LOL...I was going to add, "Actor, writer, and sous chef."

206 posted on 10/13/2006 9:58:35 PM PDT by gogeo (Irony is not one of Islam's core competencies (thx Pharmboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
I was giving an example of what a masculine man looks like. I'm aware that actors are acting a role but it is this role that I am talking about. When I mentioned Rumsfeld and Bibi, obviously, I mentioned them for their strength and the fact that they don't waffle - a truly masculine trait.
207 posted on 10/13/2006 10:02:00 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

That's what I'm talking about, hehe.


208 posted on 10/13/2006 10:02:29 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

I don't know who he is but I'm almost 100% certain it's Photoshopped. Nobody looks like that. :-)


209 posted on 10/13/2006 10:07:11 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul


Inner strenght and dedication should have no gender classification.


210 posted on 10/13/2006 10:13:39 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay; scott7278; Alberta's Child; proud_yank; Army Air Corps; HitmanLV
Inner strenght and dedication should have no gender classification.

It doesn't. It never did and it never will. But masculinity goes beyond that as I explained in my previous post.

Gotta go to bed, I'm playing squash tomorrow.

Nighty night, all. Sweet dreams.

211 posted on 10/13/2006 10:20:25 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Brown Noser! p_y ;)

ROFL!
212 posted on 10/13/2006 10:20:43 PM PDT by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

Good night, and have fun tomorrow.


213 posted on 10/13/2006 10:21:39 PM PDT by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Inner strength and dedication should have no gender classification.

VD's post is about what she finds sexually appealing in a man, and to a greater extent what many women find appealing in men. While those traits are not exclusively masculine, I tend to think that women tend to notice and appreciate them more in a man, than men tend to notice and appreciate them in a woman.

Truth is, most men won't even notice inner strength and dedication in a woman, as they tend to not be immediately apparent nor primarily high on the sex appeal list for most men.

They do tend to be apparent and fairly high on the sex appeal list for most women, though. That's the point I appreciated from VD's post.

214 posted on 10/13/2006 10:28:48 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Hey there Victoria!

What a great post.

I listened to Father Loya, a Catholic priest featured regularly on Relevant Radio, talk about musculinity in the context of Pope John Paul's theology of the body, a few weeks ago. You are right on with your assessment, and very much reiterates the writings of Pope John Paul, The Great.

Masculinity allows men to be confident to their faith, and their absolute respect for women. When others try to dismiss the masculinity of man they totally dismiss the attributes that the good Lord has given man. Strong, caring, respectful, and faithful to God are so intrinsic to man's identity that they should not be dismissed as sexist or backwards. Unfortunately we are living in a society now that is hell bent to change all of the rules that has made our society successful. When did the arrogance start?

I certainly believe it was lost when people started losing focus on God, and all the blessings that he has bestowed upon man.

During the week I was reading some philosophy of God's existence from St. Thomas Aquinas, and I told my students when I refer to "man" I am speaking for men and women. I told them I will not dumb down the translation to make it not seem "Sexist" or out dated. They liked the idea that this was done.

Sometimes I think my 8th grade CCD students know more than a lot of adults that are out there. They understand that there are differences in men and women, and those differences are blessings.

Great post... You are a tremendous woman to behold, and are worth defending and/or rescuing, should you ever need it!

God Bless.

215 posted on 10/14/2006 4:44:08 AM PDT by Northern Yankee ( Stay The Course!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: SeenTheLights Mom

bump


216 posted on 10/14/2006 4:45:10 AM PDT by exnavy (God bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
All jokes aside, I hope masculinity never disappears. Real women like real men, and that means masculine men.

Bravo, Victoria! You are all woman!! Real women such as you inspire real men everywhere ;-)

217 posted on 10/14/2006 5:32:16 AM PDT by DakotaGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV; Victoria Delsoul; Alberta's Child; proud_yank
VD's post is about.........

I understand very well what this poster's opinion is; however, because I might raise my own opinions which appear not, on the surface, in keeping with the "landslide" of others or the (VD)poster's own opines; but truly, in fun, only digging for a little more genuineness of opinion with less "Vanity Fair Resound" in debate.

I will now conclude; however, while scrubbing out my Peri dish, that the poster has actually conducted [unknowingly]her own experiment on this forum. And with use, in part, of her terrific profile page was able to suck in the stomachs of many of her male FReeper contemporaries here. Were these sensitive answers in keeping with the true "working" character of those commenting or were their opinions that one wants the other to hear?

Life is an ice cream cone.(RummyGump-ism). It comes in different flavors. The flavor, whether plain vanilla or chocolate fudge chunk, the one most addicted to, cannot be reasoned why; nor ever even questioned for that matter, but only enjoyed. Grab hold of your favorite flavor as best you can, respect those that seek to keep us free, and challenge and refute those that seek, for whatever reason, to destroy.

218 posted on 10/14/2006 7:49:55 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay (Don't take me too seriously, I don't.......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: SeenTheLights Mom

I guess that's how gays "evolve", by trying to feminize the rest of world.

Good for me I don't believe in evolution.


219 posted on 10/14/2006 7:54:15 AM PDT by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

That's all fine, but is peripheral to the issue raised in my post.


220 posted on 10/14/2006 8:11:21 AM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-254 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson