Posted on 10/21/2006 8:07:20 AM PDT by tcostell
You would think that a belief system where the most lauded members are those who blow themselves up would have some serious marketing problems. I mean how exactly do you get rational post-secular westerners to buy into an idea like that? But Islam is the world’s fastest growing religion none the less. And much of it's growth is owed to its rapid conversion of certain segments of western society.
At a glance it defies all logic, but it's true. It's a commonly held view that when a person stops believing in organized religion they don't then believe in nothing, but begin to believe in anything. This describes the state of many in the post-secular west. And for people in that mental and emotional state, divorced from their society without any common emotional ground to bind them to their family and community, Islam apparently has some intrinsic appeal. But this then begs the question "Who are these people?” Who would be willing to give up so much of the promise of the 21st century west for the cold restricted structure of 15th century Islam? Who would be prepared to trade the "We hope you believe but it's really up to you" optimism of western theology for the choice between unyielding submission to the political hierarchy of the faith, or the business end of the faithful's sword?
Well in a word... its losers. Islam is growing in the western world by picking the low hanging fruit of society. Those most lacking in the skills it takes to succeed in the west, are irresistibly drawn to Islam. In a single stroke, Islam provides not only the craved for structure of a rigid life and a ready political apparatus which blames others for their hardships, but provides the promise of eternal reward in heaven for the very characteristics which have brought them only failure in the west. In short, it's a religion which rewards the loser for the very things which make them a loser, and encourages them to use violence to bring the rest of society down to their level. This is why it's becomes such a popular faith in the US prison systems, and why it's growing so rapidly among the discontented portions of western society. Whatever your personal failure, Islam has an explanation that makes it clear that someone else is responsible.
In the history of man, no society has so successfully provided each individual with opportunity like the United States. In the US, the circumstances of your birth don't matter, nor does your race, nor your gender, or anything else other than your own personal initiative. In America, both men and women from every religious, racial, ethnic, and economic subgroup have continually reached the pinnacle of success in their chosen fields. And the world over it's widely regarded as fact that if you are truly extraordinary at something, then America is where you will receive the greatest reward for it. America loves a winner, and our society rewards them well. We recruit them in every slice of life, from athletes, to engineers, to writers to educators, and everything else. If there is a greatest ditch digger on the planet, then the odds would be that he's digging a ditch somewhere in the US. And it's the very idea “that success can come to anyone" which makes the US what it is.
But that isn't to say that it’s a perfect meritocracy where only those who deserve it are rewarded. It's still a society of men, and many of those men, for whatever reason, will do what they must to stand in the way of others as well. So while the opportunity is clearly there, that alone is not a guarantee of success. Some people, for whatever reason, lack the initiative, or the determination, or sometimes even the intelligence to achieve the same level of success as others in their chosen field. But the question of success is not what you start out with in life, but what you do with it. The people who achieve success are usually those who when faced with an obstacle will work harder, jump higher, run faster, and do whatever is necessary to get around it. Success isn't defined by talent as much as it is by determination. But some people don't react that way. Some people, when faced with an obstacle, will be quick to abandon their effort, and begin blaming others for their troubles. They fail to take responsibility, and instead look to find a scapegoat. And along comes Islam.
The very core concept of Islam is the unconditional surrender to the will of Allah. At its very heart, Islam encourages its faithful to not take responsibility for the circumstances of their life. And from that basis all other Islamic law follows. Have you had trouble with women? No problem... under Islam a woman is more a piece of property than a person, so you will be able to command, and they must obey, if not... it's the sword or stoning. Have you had trouble in business? No problem... under Islam, most worldly matters of commerce are left to the Dhimmi, those members of the unfaithful tolerated under Islam like slaves thanks to the high taxes paid by them for the right to survive. But if the taxes should stop flowing, or the Dhimmi become defiant, then Islam provides a solution that even a loser can understand, again, it's the sword. On and on, Islamic law makes it clear that if you are among the faithful, then anytime the world fails to meet your expectations, the perfectly acceptable and moral solution is violence.
In short, Islam is a belief system which codifies a theological structure where those people least capable of achieving success on their own gain the political means of either taking or restricting the success of others by force. It’s a triumph of violence as the means to realize the will of god, over the "reason" of the western world. And in the west, people who choose violence over reason are losers. And so it grows in the prisons of the US, and the suburban slums of Paris. It gathers strength from the bottom, speaking a language that the losers of the west can understand. "Obey" they say, "Obey, and we will give the means to take your revenge on a society that has left you behind. Obey, and we will make you mighty, obey and your violence will be the last expression of the will of god."
What those losers who convert fail to realize however, is that the price for their vengeance, and the cost of their scapegoat, is that they too become a slave. If they aren’t responsible for the bad things that happen to them, then they aren't responsible for the good that comes to them either. There may be no failure for them under Islam, but then there will be no triumph for them as well. And should they achieve some moment of greatness, then they will quickly find that they too may be guilty of some obscure violation of sharia, and that the sword of Islam cuts both ways.
For myself, I may not be the most successful man I know, or for that matter the most faithful, but my success and my failures all belong to me. And for that alone, I'll stick to the reason of the west over the violence of Islam, anyday.
BTTT
Interesting piece and how true!!!
In reading this one can't help compare this to the liberal way of thinking....
Good job. I hope this gets wide circulation.
BTW, a buddy of mine is the Greatest Ditch Digger in the World. He's a genius with a backhoe, and is compensated well for his skill.
Islam is not the fastest growing religion. Christianity is. The rate of growth in the West may be high, but in absolute numbers, it is meaningless. Tens of millions are being converted to Christianity in China and millions in Africa. Dozens to Islam in Europe. And don't forget Muslims are converting Christianity all over the world. No comparison.
Well said....and it figures to me that islam converts numbers are rapidly growing. There are so, so many loosers all around, everywhere.
Don't agree? Go sit in on any court session on no particular day. Watch how many screw ups go before the judge for felony offenses...fraud, drugs, assault, multiple DUI, theft, stolen property, and on and on.
What kills me is that the Judge so often hands down a court hearing date and out the door they go, back on the street. You think they'll make thier court date? Pffft.
Perhaps so. Large numbers of effectively organized "losers" can do a lot of harm, however, and the self-labeled "winners" should not under-estimate them. I wonder if either classification is quite coherent, and if those who so facilely assign these labels to their neighbors might not be deluding themselves in a personally harmful way.
It does seem clear that inhabitants of the world of Islam are most miserable, unable to fully trust their "brothers" in that there is constant suspicion about who are the "sincere" and "orthodox" and who are the "hypocrites" and heretical, with severe consequences for those who are classified (mistakenly or not) into the latter group , though the incoherence of the definitions makes it problematic to recognize a "mistake" or a "correct decision" when you see one. One sees the predictable result of these incoherent classifications in the incessant in-fighting among the various claimants to Islamic authority, most recently on display in Iraq but also evident to anyone who follows the twisted pathways of current events in the Middle East and in the Asian territories of Islam (e.g., Indonesia, Pakistan, and Malaysia).
Christendom went through a time like this, leading to the current fragmentation of the sects, but has mostly recovered the ability to "disagree without being disagreeable" (though observers of contemporary church splits will laugh at this). Still, one does not see dozens of throats being slit and martyr bombers imolating themselves and neighbors when churches fuss at each other.
Take care in defining this "loser"/"winner" contrast, and avoid a similar fate.
The truth will set you free, free to achieve all that you can.
Islam,
1% religion
99% social control
a lot like communism
But it's a good point all the same... I agree ... very similar.
This is a key concept in any area of life, and one that the victimologists conveniently forget. Once people realize this, they can escape the poverty trap.
Once again, it's all about personal reponsibility.
islam (I refuse to capitalize the word) means literally I submit.
Thanks for a great post!
bttt
The man who stands for nothing,
will fall for anything.
To further support the points made in the article, over forty percent of the Muslim world is illiterate. Muhammad was also illiterate and I have always thought that this was at least partially responsible for his irrational hatred of the Jews.
Many or most religions have to do with getting help from a "higher power," and some people find all religions suspect for that very reason.
Since so many religions do promise comfort or aid to those who can't cope, it's hard to see that such an accusation disproves or discredits a particular religion.
Please feel free to hand it off to any liberals or Muslims.
It was really written for them anyway.
And for centuries these losers have been breeding with any other losers they could enslave.
Evolution thrown into reverse.
excellent essay and cogent argument!
I think it can be shown pretty clearly with nothing more than game theory, that there is a fundamental difference between the kind of problem solving offered under Christian morality and Islamic morality.
My point is that it's not necessary to believe in one or the other to be able to show that the Christian world's morality leads to conflict resolution that benefits everyone, and that Islamic morality leads to conflict resolution which usually benefits one party at the expense of the other. Eventually, this leads to even greater differences in the opposing societies which are structured on that concept.
And getting help from a "higher power to find the strength to accept my faults" is one thing but getting help from a "higher power to slaughter my enemies and punish the people that made my life suck" is another. One invloves taking personal responsiblity, which in my opinion is the hallamrk of chrstianity, and the other involves holding other people acocuntable for whatever is wrong with your life.
Calling two philosophies "religions" doesn't neccesarily make them into the same thing. And personally I don't think Ted Turner is a particularly good example of a critical thinker.
The ultimate measure of success is the collective survival not the opportunity for the individuals.
If you have more children you win, if you do not have enough children you follow the path of dinosaurs, no matter how big and ferocious you are or how much money you made.
Needn't go that far...they were his competition. He wanted to supplant Judaism and Christianity. He could not coexist with the infidel: convert or die.
"it's a religion which rewards the loser for the very things which make them a loser"
That explains why the left loves it so much.
"encourages its faithful to not take responsibility for the circumstances of their life"
Another beloved belief of the left.
Notice which certain segments of society are attracted by this belief system -
those who have been unwilling to take responsibility for their underachievement
and who make a good living out of blaming their problems on the white Christian majority.
This is an excellent article.
Very good.
This explains the similarities between Socialists and Muslims. Both are organizations of losers and use similar methods to bring down the successful.
The losers of Islam are just petulent children who would burn down the house just because Mom won't give them ice cream. Nihilists.
Excellent article.
Does anything in particular about 'the meek shall inherit the earth' strike you as an aspect of a religion that appeals to winners?
Insecure, immature, lazy men that are afraid of the strength, stability and forward thinking that women add to a society, the give-and-take needed in a loving relationship, would rather use this demi-god pseudo-religeon as the basis to have women be their slaves and property instead.
Guilt tripping the females that they're going to hell, if they don't be "cattle". Force keeping them uneducated so they won't find out this truth. Kill any that start to "stir up trouble."
My essay isn't about whether you like Christianity or not. And I think it can be demonstrated using objective terms that anyone would agree to regardless of faith, that the Christian world is VASTLY more successful by virtually any measure than the Islamic world. A man on the moon and a bone in the nose are not the same thing.
So a better question I think, is why would one assume that simply being meek makes one a loser?
In the western (read Christian) world, faith and success are not mutually exclusive by any means.
I don't see any evidence here that Jesus was talking about materially successful people when he said the 'meek' shall inherit the earth.
Now that's a ringing endorsement for material overachieving if I ever read one! ;-)
The definition of success that I was thinking about was a little different. I was talking about a more macro view. In the Christian world, every effort is made to encourage everyone involved in a conflict to find a way to a solution without specifically damaging another party. The win/win solution is viewed as the best. Not so under Islam.
And cherry picking the bible to lend credence to your personal definition of success doesn't negate my point.
Excuse me... I meant post number #22.
No problem.
Data on China is hard to come by, but for starters, there was an article in The Economist earlier this year. Here is a link, but you need a subscription to see the whole article. But it's a start: http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=3896585
Here are some excerpts from The Economist story about this growth: http://www.killrighty.net/2005/05/01/christianity-in-china/
Here's a link to a 2004 article from Christianity Today, which reports estimates of the number of Christians in China ranges from 30 million to 100 million:
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2004/februaryweb-only/2-16-31.0.html
This story also reports how shocked the Communists are at the rapid growth of Christianity.
I'll try to find more about the other items I mentioned and send them shortly.
Here's a link to an article that estimates that 20,000 Muslims convert to Christianity every year in America. This, in spite of all the death threats they get.
http://amightywind.com/islam/muslimconverts.htm
Meanwhile the number of Christian converts to Islam is estimated 50,000 a year. Hardly an earth-shattering number.
http://www.leaderu.com/theology/islaminamerica.html
It also mentions the book, The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity, Philip Jenkins, which cites the rapid growth of Christianity in Africa, Aisa and Latin America. The book further notes that despite the rising number of Islamic immigrants to the U.S., there are far higher numbers of Christian immigrants.
Here's a link to a story about the rise of Islamic converts to Christianity in Kashmir, the area of India that has been the source of tensions between India and Pakistan.
http://www.milligazette.com/Archives/2004/16-31Jul04-Print-Edition/163107200455.htm
All because Abraham's wife thought she was too old to have chaildren
Thank you for taking the time and trouble to get me some articles on the subject. Aloha
Here's a link to the web site, "Muslims for Christ." You can bet this will never be covered by the DBM.
http://www.exmuslim.com/
While this goes against my theme, you'll be interested in this link to a piece by Daniel Pipes, which reveals that the ranks of Muslim terrorists are being filled by Christian converts to Islam.
http://acuf.org/issues/issue50/051222cul.asp
In my view, offering the emotional strength to take personal responsibility for your actions, and the political authority to punish those who made you feel bad is not the same thing, even if they both might appeal to someone who "has less". I believe there is a fundamental difference between encouraging someone to take responsibility and authorizing them to take retribution.
Do you mean to say otherwise? Is it your view that because both Christianity and Islam offer moral solutions to those with less, that they are therefore the same somehow?
Here's a link to a story about converts from Islam within Islamic countries that appeared in Christianity Today. It includes converts in Algeria, Libya, Egypt, Bangladesh and others. This report claims there has been an increase in the number of people who attend underground churches in North Africa from a tiny 2,000 Christians 10 years ago to 50,000 today. It says Christianity is growing faster than Islam in Bangladesh -- the increase in the number of Christians each year is growing at a rate twice that of the growth rate of the population.
http://www.exmuslim.com/khaled/doors.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.