Check out this native American Jesus. 
Posted on 10/25/2006 6:22:33 PM PDT by Nachum
LOS ANGELES - It's a familiar image for millions of Christians: Jesus Christ, with a crown of thorns, hanging from the cross. What color is he? In a controversial new film opening Friday, he is black.
"Color of the Cross" tells a traditional story, focusing on the last 48 hours of his life as told in the Gospels. In this version, though, race contributes to his persecution.
It is the first representation in the history of American cinema of Jesus as a black man.
"It's very important because (the film) is going to provide an image of Jesus for African-Americans that is no longer under the control of whites," says Stephenson Humphries-Brooks, an associate professor of religious studies at New York's Hamilton College and author of "Cinematic Savior: Hollywood's Making of the American Christ."
What Jesus looked like has long been debated by theologians around the world. Different cultures have imagined him in different ways, says Stephen Prothero, chairman of the religion department at Boston University. In Japan, Jesus looks Japanese. In Africa, he is black. But in America he is almost always white, like the fair-haired savior painted by Leonardo Da Vinci in "The Last Supper" in 1495.
While some black churches have images of a black Jesus behind the altar and others have claimed Christ was black, Prothero says "none of those arguments or images have filtered much into the mainstream."
Filmmaker Jean Claude LaMarre set out to change that with "Color of the Cross." LaMarre, who plays Jesus, wrote, directed and financed the film. It will open in 30 theaters in predominantly black neighborhoods.
"Black people in this country are the only race of people who worship a god outside their own image," says LaMarre, 38, adding that showing Christ as a black man is "the most poignant way to deal with the issue of race in this country because it goes to the heart of how we look at the world."
It also provides a positive image of blacks, something that's been scant in the U.S., says the Rev. Cecil "Chip" Murray, longtime leader of L.A.'s First African Methodist Episcopal Church and a producer of the film.
"It could be revolutionary because, for four centuries in our nation, blacks have been at the lowest end of the stratum," he says. "I think it will traumatize the United States more than it will foreign nations who, to some extent, don't have a centuries-old concept of equating black with negativity."
Humphries-Brooks agrees. Other countries are likely to view the film "in a more detached manner," he says, "because of the way (they) see our race-relations problem."
Why does race matter in the story of Christ?
"Jesus isn't in the hands of historians," Prothero says. "What we have now is our own debate and, in that debate, race has to be a factor because race is a big predicament in American life."
Film is a powerful place to have the discussion, says Humphries-Brooks, who calls the medium "one of the last places that is quasi-public for the formation of values in America."
"Artistic and aesthetic views are as important in developing religious values as the words we speak. Everybody goes to the movies. Not everybody goes to the same church."
Filmmaker LaMarre thinks the film can only have a positive effect.
"The message is that color, a colored Jesus Christ, doesn't matter," he says. "That's why the movie is important. When you have one prevailing image out there, it suggests color does matter."
Just what we need--a Marxist reading of the Gospels.
Of course not. Would you?
In any case anyone who believes the Bible already knows what Jesus heritage is.
Yes, I will too.
Right, so you think His head and hair being white as snow means His head and hair were actually black?
LOL
Check out this native American Jesus.
Agreed.
Nothing is less relevent than the color of skin Jesus wore when He walked the earth 2000 years ago.
See post #166.
If a Black Jesus can keep them staying with Christ and away from Islam, it is ok by me.
LOL...your mental rambling there gave me a good little chuckle. Thanks!
God Himself doesn't have DNA per se, unless He wants to. But He would have to impart DNA to His Earth-bound son, to make him a functional human being. Jesus, at least as I was taught, is fully God and fully Man, with neither diminishing the other. So at least while he walked the Earth, breathing oxygen and such, he must have had 23 chromosome pairs like the rest of us.
In the present conversation, my point is this: most children look a little like their mother and a little like their father. The degrees vary. But if God, the creator of all, was one of the parents of Jesus, we could expect Jesus to look like everyone; African, Asian, European, Australian, Antarctican, or American. Which traits are emphasized in one movie or another are immaterial. To assume that God, or Jesus, looks like one of us is he very height of hubris.
Thanks for the ping!
And what part does Joe Pesci play? And, what of Rene Russo?
So?
Hush yo' mouth!
That is true. Blue eyes blonde hair Jesus is just as historically innacurate but we don't bitch about that so much.
Jesus was a Jew. The Bible is clear Jesus was a Jew. Anyone with half a brain knows he was Jewish. For these people to racialize Christ is despicable and reveals the sickness of racism in their own hearts. Their "Christianity" leaves a lot to be desired.
I've seen a lot of white-haired black folks. Also anyone would be pale after being crucifed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.