Lots more detail in this article than the one posted a few days ago.... there is a hearing this Friday to determine the federal monitor issue.
Would observers be allowed to watch the whole process, or would they be limited to ensuring resources for Spanish speakers to vote?
I'm referring to those precincts where they get 100+% turnout.
(actually, it's Carter arriving at 3-mile Island in 1979.)
The report, "Vote Fraud, Intimidation & Suppression In The 2004 Presidential Election," is the most comprehensive and authoritative review of the facts surrounding allegations of vote fraud, intimidation and suppression made during the 2004 presidential election. The report lists the top five election fraud "hot spots" in the country based on its findings and the cities' documented history of fraud and intimidation. ACVR Legislative Fund calls for immediate attention to these areas.
I knew a guy who was an EMT in NYC and he said that when he arrived on the scene of an accident, the Hispanics would be telling him everything that happened in English. The minute a cop car showed up, it was No hablo Engles and they would require an interpreter.
He never believed that Hispanics were not fluent enough in English because he saw so much faking it.
My grandparents came over heere from *the old country* without knowing English and they learned it. What a novel concept.
That being said, the only issue here is that they don't want someone to find out about all the voter fraud going on. Otherwise, the dems would lose.
I think it's deliciously ironic that two things the Democrats profess to love: "multi-culturalism" and "bi-lingualism" may bring some Federal heat to bear on the electoral shennanigans in Philthy Philly. The GOP official cited in the article should learn to keep his yap shut.
US observers should stay in their own country and leave Philadelphia alone.
If they're gonna piss and moan about observers, triple the amount you're sending. They'll be needed. While they're at it, Detroit, Milwaukee, and St Louis shouldn't be left off the list either.
If they don't speak and read english, isn't that a RED FLAG that they shouldn't vote???
Contrast that statistic with that only 36% of the electorate have voted over the last three non-presidential cycles - the national average.
LOL!!!!
Only 103% voter turnout?
Must be the d@mned racists!
I know Republicans aren't lily white all the time, but nobody ever calls the Dems on vote fraud, like here we have this little obscure article, doubt it ever hits the mainstream press. Things are really getting vicious.
It was eerie. They were mocking Bush for his statement about how gloomy it would be if the Dems gain majority in Congress when he said that terrorists were spreading from, it's late, can't remember. I said he didn't go far enough, talked about Europe, the bus burnings in Paris, nothing in the local papers about that, posted a prediction that one week they wouldn't bother to empty the busses. The next day I saw the article on BBC about the woman being burned, didn't realize how severely, and posted about that, terrible what happened to her, read elsewhere that she is burned on 70% of her body and was a French citizen? from Senegal? (another thread here). That one made it through the censors. Even lunatics can sometimes read the writing on the wall.
There should be FBI agents stationed at every polling booth in this Town. The Democrats steal thousands of votes in Philadelphia in every election.
In elected officials' homes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It goes without saying that if those election officials were Republicans the screams to be heard from the left would be deafening.