Posted on 10/30/2006 10:08:08 PM PST by goldstategop
One repeatedly hears that some conservatives and Republicans will either vote Democrat or not vote at all -- out of anger at the Republican Party.
According to these Republican holdouts, the Republicans have governed as Democrats-lite by greatly increasing government spending and doing little about illegal immigration. Accordingly, it is better to have liberal government under liberals than liberal government under Republicans, and the Republicans need to be taught a lesson so that in the future they will govern as authentic Republicans.
Conservatives should file this thinking under the heading "Cathartic," but not under "Smart."
One of the great realizations one comes to as the years pass is how small a role reason plays in most people's decisions. From choosing products based on their packaging to deciding how to vote, passion and emotion usually eclipse reason.
Any Republican, let alone conservative, who votes Democrat or stays home out of pique with the Republican Congress or the president has chosen emotion over reason.
Have the Bush administration and Republican Congress spent too much money? Of course. And it really is quite annoying. Nothing unites conservative and moderate Republicans as does opposition to big government.
So it is not surprising that so many Republicans are furious at the increases in government spending, such as the staggeringly expensive Medicare prescription drug plan.
Add to this the fury of the conservative base of the Republican Party at the administration's apparent apathy toward illegal "immigration," and you have an Election Day problem.
Now, regarding spending, I share Republicans' anger. Republicans who don't control government spending do far more harm than Democrats who don't. Why? Because when the smaller-government party expands government, those who believe in smaller government have nowhere to turn.
Nevertheless, if it were not for the Bush administration, we never would have gotten the substantial tax cuts that have led to such a robust economy (especially impressive in light of the costs of the war in Iraq and of Katrina).
As for illegal immigration, here, too, I identify with those who are frustrated that Republicans have not done more while in control of both the executive and legislative branches of government. But at least President Bush has signed a bill authorizing the building of a 700-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexico border. No Democratic president would do that. If you care about reducing illegal immigration, isn't that reason enough to prevent the Democrats from gaining power?
And what about the single most important reason to elect Republicans -- the appointment of judges, especially justices to the Supreme Court? What sort of reasoning would lead a conservative to conclude that it is more important to express anger at Republicans than to prevent Democrats from appointing Supreme Court justices and other judges?
And taxes -- what rational conservative would prefer tax increases, one of the major goals of the Democratic Party?
As regards national security, what sort of Republicans are so angry at the Bush administration and/or the Republican Congress that they would want to replace the party that made the Patriot Act and NSA wiretapping possible with the party that opposes the Patriot Act and NSA wiretapping? And doesn't the Bush administration deserve credit for the absence of a single terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11?
How about Social Security? Why would a rational Republican want to reward the party that opposed any attempt to fix a system that will fail the next generation of Americans -- and hurt the Republican president who bravely, if ultimately futilely, spent political capital trying to fix it?
And what about tort reform? Republicans have begun reducing abuses of the legal system by passing some tort reform legislation. With Democrats in power, such achievements will be reversed, and trial lawyers and legislators will be empowered to continue to damage this country through law. That is, after all, why trial lawyers are among the biggest donors to the Democratic Party.
Finally, please remember that it was disaffected Republicans who voted for Ross Perot who helped elect Bill Clinton president, and it was disaffected Democrats who voted for Ralph Nader who helped elect George W. Bush president. Unless you run yourself, dear annoyed Republican, you will never find an ideal candidate. Compared to you and your conservative principles, real-life Republicans are indeed a failure. But compared to real-life Democrats, they are almost giants.
Vote out of anger, and you'll either vote Democrat or stay home. Vote out of reason, and you'll vote Republican. Please choose reason. If you don't like the Republican candidate, the place to get rid of him is in the primary, not the general election. The general election is not between good Republicans and irresponsible Republicans; it's between Republicans and Democrats.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
No vote is actually a vote for Islamofascism.
If you value your life, the life of your family and friends, VOTE REPUBLICAN!
SPREAD THE WORD!
Bump!
How did we get here?
The Enemy Within, aka Democrats and Liberal Media, have conspired to undermine success in the War Against Islamofascism.
Republicans In Name Only, aka RINOs, have caved to the phantom opposition, further undermining the ability of our steely-jawed military to keep our nation free.
Only Warriors like Rush Limbaugh and Free Republic continue to hold the domestic front in this brutal War.
Keep the faith, Republicans, and victory is ours!
Great post! Thanks.... There is a right time for everything and lets get out and vote for the Repulicans in 2006, and AFTER that lets address these issues and get the party back on track...
I don't think the problem is the 28% of the population (or whatever it is) that ID's Republican. I think it's the 33% that ID's independent. That's who need convincing, the swing voters. What has been done in the past 6 years to convince them?
I lay a majority of the blame on our own fifth-column mainstream media. They've done everything possible to undermine the current administration. I'm confident conservative voters know what's at stake and will do the right thing.
So why did you post another thread urging Republicans not to vote for Kean in NJ????? What is wrong with you?
DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT A VOTE FOR EITHER WILL CLOSE THE BORDERS? Do you not think that the next president won't be a CRF, trilateralist, New World Order follower? Do these types represent 85% of us Americans?
Well, that would be okay if we actually had a choice in the primary.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
Now wait a minute...isn't this the purpose of primary elections, to lame duck the current RINO in office and vote for someone the electorate does prefer to run against the 'Rat?? At least in theory??
We did here in Idaho, at least in the House 1st District Race. We had about 6 candidates, 4 RINOs, 1 actual conservative, and Robert Vazquez.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
That's what I was thinking. There are only a few Republicans I don't like, but this year if I had to vote for them I would, just to keep the 'Rats out. I am glad I don't live in McCain's district cause I would vote for him even though I don't like him a lot. This isn't the time to play games and not vote for the better candidate just because the candidate isn't perfect or is best friends with John Kerry.
The more important thing to remember about voting Republican this year is that a vote that gets a Dem in one state will hurt the pubbie in another state or the rest of the pubbies. This year, it IS all about protecting good conservatives and conservative seats, like Talent, Allen, Santorum, and Pawlenty, (to name just a few), and not about a tantrum over supposed RINO's. If we "lose" Tennessee, RI, Maryland, OH, and either house of Congress, then we lose power across the nation, making conservative voices LESS likely to be heard next time around.
If you live in a world where evil powers control our government and Cheney and Leahy are working towards the same goal, why do you worry about who gets elected?
If not supporting liberals just because they're "republicans" causes conservatives to lose power, maybe we deserve to lose...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.