Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My October 5th E-Mail to the IAEA Regarding Saddam Re-Constructing His Nuclear Program
November 3rd 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 11/03/2006 11:23:55 AM PST by jveritas

On October 5th 2006 I sent the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) an e-mail requesting some answers to the findings I got from the captured Iraqi documents regarding Saddam Regime re-constructing their prohibited nuclear program. The findings were about Saddam regime rebuilding and re-using some of their nuclear labs and facilities like the RWTS (Radioactive Waste Treatment Station), Radio-Chemistry Laboratories, and the Degussa Furnaces which are used to melt Uranium and other nuclear activities.

Of course I did not receive any response from the IAEA but here we go today and read in the New York Times article that the IAEA has complained recently about US captured documents showing some sensitive nuclear information. The IAEA and the New York Times did not care about the documents showing Saddam regime re-constructing its nuclear program because these documents expose all the lies that they have been spreading in the last three years but they are rather focusing on a small released portion of Iraq 1996 FFCD (Full Final and complete disclosure) that relates to Iraq previous nuclear program.

I am not sure if the IAEA was not aware, before I sent them the e-mail, that the captured Iraqi documents were posted on the FMSO website but it seems they have reacted just recently about these documents and their reaction unfortunately was not to show Saddam re-building his nuclear programs as many documents prove but rather to blame the Bush administration for publishing part of Iraq 1996 FFCD which by the way was not such a secret document as the IAEA is pretending since this FFCD has been reviewed by experts of “Members Nations” and thus it can be subjected to leak regardless.

Below is my E-mail to the IAEA on October 5th regarding documents that reveal Saddam re-constructing his nuclear program:

From: Shahda, Joseph

Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 10:26 PM

To: 'g.voigt@iaea.org'

Subject: Questions about Iraq (Saddam regime) Nuclear Activities/programs

Dear Sir/Madam

My name is Joseph Shahda from Abington Massachusetts, USA. I have been translating some of the Iraqi documents (Saddam Hussein regime) captured after the Operation Iraqi Freedom and that are posted on the US Foreign Military Intelligence Service (FMSO) website (http://70.168.46.200/). Some of the documents I have reviewed so far are related to potential nuclear program activities. I would like some clarifications if possible to help me more understand these documents.

(1) Was Iraq allowed to re-build its Radioactive Waste Treatment System (RWTS)?

(2) Was Iraq allowed to re-build its Radiochemistry Laboratories?

(3) Was Iraq allowed to fix and re-use furnaces or ovens from ex-nuclear facilities?

I greatly appreciate if you can reply to my questions above. Thank you very much for all your help.

Sincerely;

Joseph Shahda

Abington, Massachusetts

U.S.A


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: jveritas; prewardocs; saddamnuke; saddamnukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: jveritas
It might not be a bad time for you to be interviewed by Hannity, O'Reilly, or someone like that. Have they ever called?
21 posted on 11/03/2006 12:41:41 PM PST by Carling (It's Danny, Sir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

You are very welcome. If you read it closely and then follow up on the 'detailed' reports the IAEA gave to the UN leading up to the war, you will find that it is full of lies and ommissions!


22 posted on 11/03/2006 12:43:40 PM PST by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

bttt


23 posted on 11/03/2006 12:48:18 PM PST by TigersEye ("Everywhere I go there's a Predator in tow, life goes on without me!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Relevant links ...

Bush vindicated! Saddam Closer To Bomb Than Anyone Thought (different thread than above)

The New York Times Strikes (Out) Again

Senator Santorum Comments on Release of Valuable Information in Pre-War Documents Discovered in Iraq

U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Guide (Saddam Hussein had a nuclear weapons program)

Saddam Closer To Bomb Than Anyone Thought

Shocker: New York Times Confirms Iraqi Nuclear Weapons Program

JVERITAS Responds to the 11/3 NYT Article Regarding Iraq Nuclear Program.

The Grey Lady's November Surprise (Dean Barnett on the NYT)

Rep. Hoekstra (Republican) responds to NYTimes

Bill Clinton and CIA Gave Iranians Blueprint for Nuclear Bomb

Iran - CIA 'gave bomb plan to Tehran' (Clinton Legacy - Nuclear weapons)

24 posted on 11/03/2006 12:50:30 PM PST by TigersEye ("Everywhere I go there's a Predator in tow, life goes on without me!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Oops! This "(different thread than above)" should be after the second link titled "Saddam Closer To Bomb Than Anyone Thought"


25 posted on 11/03/2006 12:52:15 PM PST by TigersEye ("Everywhere I go there's a Predator in tow, life goes on without me!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Carling

They did not call and I do not expect them to. I do not think they have been really interested in knowing the important finds in these documents.


26 posted on 11/03/2006 12:58:48 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Thanks, jveritas. You have my prayers, too.
27 posted on 11/03/2006 1:00:20 PM PST by piano-woman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

jveritas - I'll kick the butt of anyone that messes with you - as I'm sure all FReepers would. Thank you for all that you have done. We are all much more informed thanks to you!


28 posted on 11/03/2006 2:07:32 PM PST by Chickenhawk Warmonger (All aboard the Chickenhawk Express... www.chickenhawkexpress.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger
Thank you very much CW :)

By the way I just posted an article that show a website which tells in great details how to design and engineer a nuclear weapon. The New York Times and the IAEA are liars.

29 posted on 11/03/2006 2:39:35 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Salman Pak really had a double decker bus?


30 posted on 11/03/2006 3:45:29 PM PST by Blue State Insurgent (Those who know the truth need to speak out against these kinds of myths, and lies, and distortions..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Joseph

I know you are probably getting sick of answering fan mail, but you one of crown jewels of this place.

You will certainly go down in the FReeper Hall of Fame, just like Buckhead, TankerKC, and Howlin during RatherGate.

To your great credit, you stuck with us during the crisis in Lebanon, when, in the emotion of the hour, many people were saying injudicious things.

We will tell our children, "We knew this guy. He probably won't get the credit he is due. I can't remember his real name, but he changed the world"
31 posted on 11/03/2006 3:53:27 PM PST by dinasour (Pajamahadeen, SnowFlake, and Eeevil Doer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Way to go. Excellent work, thanks.


32 posted on 11/03/2006 4:07:48 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

BUMP!


33 posted on 11/03/2006 4:31:12 PM PST by fanfan ("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

major bump


34 posted on 11/03/2006 4:45:50 PM PST by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

So, in other words, someone at the IAEA blabbed to the NYT. Between the two of them they came up with the phony excuse that nuclear bomb building instructions were posted at the government site because it was obvious you were finding evidence the IAEA and the NYT didn't want you to find. It was a way to stop you and anyone else from translating the documents. The truth is not on the agenda of the NYT or the IAEA.


35 posted on 11/03/2006 5:11:44 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thanks for all your hard work. I have been following the Saddam Document translations from the start. Thanks again for keeping US in the KNOW. Too bad the MSM won't listen. Keep it up and Stay Safe


36 posted on 11/03/2006 5:21:06 PM PST by glymers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Can you post what you posted here over at Michelle Malkin's hotair.com?

http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/03/radiaoctive-more-on-the-nyt-iraqi-nuke-article/


37 posted on 11/03/2006 5:27:58 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I read that Congressman Hoekstra is hinting some of the documents the Times whined about were internal IAEA documents....and maybe we need to ask someone in IAEA how Saddams regime came upon them..


38 posted on 11/03/2006 6:12:40 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

This is unbelievable. I am so glad you saved this and grateful you shared it with us.
As always, thanks for all of your hard work.


39 posted on 11/03/2006 7:09:04 PM PST by JerseyDvl ("If you attack Americans, we'll defend your right to do it."- The Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

You are welcome :)


40 posted on 11/03/2006 7:11:02 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson