Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ten Commandments stunner: Ten Commandments stunner: Feds lying at Supreme Court
worldnetdaily.com ^ | November 14, 2006 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 11/13/2006 10:57:02 PM PST by B4Ranch

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-200 next last
To: Amos the Prophet
Recent election results have broken me of the notion that politics is any substitute for the salvation of society. Indeed, the worse government becomes the stronger people of The Way of Jesus become.

bumping that! happy to find you here!

101 posted on 11/15/2006 2:48:17 AM PST by .30Carbine (See God in every detail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
I did not even consider that possibility until your mention of it. Interesting!
102 posted on 11/15/2006 3:05:06 AM PST by .30Carbine (See God in every detail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon; melancholy; True Republican Patriot
Good Morning "Cinnamon"!!

I just thought I would share a word from the heart, soul, and pen of James Madison (1751~1836), often referred to as the "Chief Architect of the Constitution" He authored 29 of the 85 Federalist Papers:

"We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government; upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God."

Nancee

James Madison; 1778 Statement; emphasis is mine.

103 posted on 11/15/2006 7:00:33 AM PST by Nancee ((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

BUMP!!!


104 posted on 11/15/2006 7:09:12 AM PST by Nancee ((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

We could use a 1000 more people in our courts who think like Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore does.


105 posted on 11/15/2006 7:31:05 AM PST by B4Ranch (Illegal immigration Control and US Border Security - The jobs George W. Bush refuses to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ; melancholy; True Republican Patriot
"10 Commandments don't exactly jive with the Bill of Rights, guess which the Supreme Court is charged with upholding..."

Here is just a sampling of what Thomas Jefferson had to say about the "Supreme Court":

"Nothing in the Constitution has given them [the federal judges] a right to decide for the Executive, more than to the Executive to decide for them...But the opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional, and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action, but for the legislature and executive also, in their spheres, would make the judiciary a despotic branch."*1

And this:

"The germ of dissolution of our federal government is in...the federal judiciary; an irresponsible body (for impeachment is scarcely a scare-crow) working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be ursurped from the States."*2

It is my observation and opinion that this is precisely what we are living with today: the Supreme Court is a despotic group which has ursurped enormous power from the States.

Nancee

*1 Letter to Abigail Adams, September 11, 1804.

*2 Letter to Mr. Hammond (1821).

106 posted on 11/15/2006 7:53:13 AM PST by Nancee ((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
"can you rectify the incongruency of freedom of religion in the Bill of Rights and the commandments expressly forbidding religious freedom?

Gunslinger...I see you have stopped discussing this matter. I would like to offer a couple points and a suggestion for reading. First off, please get your hands on a book called "The Myth of Seperation"....WONDERFUL book...In it you'll see that teaching a Judeo-Christian religion was REQUIRED of states when they applied for state-hood!

Secondly, the Declaration of Independence says that we were "endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable right..." "Unalienable" means non-transferable: people can't surrender these rights, even voluntarily. Or Natural rights - rights from birth. If the government "GIVES" us those rights, then the government can TAKE those rights away. It is the fact that those rights were GIVEN TO US BY OUR CREATOR, that MAN CAN NOT TAKE THEM AWAY!

THAT is the difference between the US and every other government up to that point. The King gave rights, and thus took them away when he wanted. Our founders believed that GOD gave us those rights.... . Thanks....

107 posted on 11/15/2006 8:08:40 AM PST by BallparkBoys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Those remarks are a great exaggeration. In fact, the history channel just completed a multi-houred miniseries on the Revolution and it was almost entirely about the Founders. (I did think Hamilton was not given proper credit.)

Nor are the remarks about the Iroquois governmental influence entirely new or false.
108 posted on 11/15/2006 8:16:36 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

You're welcome to misrepresent what is taking place. I don't particularly mind, because folks are noticing the same thing I am. I'm speaking of programs I have been watching on PBS and other informative channels. My comments stand.

I said history channels, and think you should have been able to think outside the box and understand I wasn't necessarily refering to the History Channels.


109 posted on 11/15/2006 8:25:28 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Most of the history programs are on the History Channel however, the ones which aren't are quite similiar and I watch quite a few of them now and have for years. None were as you claim.


110 posted on 11/15/2006 8:57:18 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

BUMP!!!


111 posted on 11/15/2006 9:23:28 AM PST by Nancee ((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

BUMP!!!


112 posted on 11/15/2006 9:32:51 AM PST by Nancee ((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Checked out your homepage and really enjoyed the "Famous Gun Nuts". Great stuff. Your essay on fanaticism was excellent.
Good work.
113 posted on 11/15/2006 9:50:48 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
I see the same thing. I listen to a lot of talk radio. None of the conservative commentators use God in any of their arguments. How do you argue against stem cells research using embryos and homosexual marriage without invoking His name? What is the percentage of Freepers who are inspired by Judea/Christian beliefs? I fear we are in more trouble than we know.

On the flip side, it's nothing that hasn't happened before and hopefully the faithful stay strong. It's a shame our country can't realize this is a blessed country and give God his due. I guess we just have to pray and enjoy the ride.

114 posted on 11/15/2006 10:04:31 AM PST by stevio (Red-Blooded Crunchy Con American Male (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

Well said.


115 posted on 11/15/2006 10:07:53 AM PST by stevio (Red-Blooded Crunchy Con American Male (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
I guess in this era of not wanting to offend anyone, the recent stewards of the building didn't want any religious references at all, which is quite silly.

For what it's worth, I last visited the Supreme Court building about six months ago, and I took the ten minute "tour." One person specifically asked the question about the Ten Commandments, and the tour guide said exactly what you did: it is represented in the artwork because it is foundational to our system of law and government.

It's noteworthy that I had a different experience than this fellow.

116 posted on 11/15/2006 10:20:13 AM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stevio

BUMP!!


117 posted on 11/15/2006 10:20:46 AM PST by Nancee ((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Publius Valerius
"It is noteworthy that I had a different experience than this fellow."

To what do you attribute this? I find this interesting indeed.

Nancee

118 posted on 11/15/2006 10:34:20 AM PST by Nancee ((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: stevio
...."How do you argue against stem cells research......."

I agree with your premise, but we must be able to win arguments on the wisdom of it. Not everyone is a believer. When the Bible states that God loves us and only has our good in mind, a non believer can't "get" that. So, we have to show the argument that going against what God teaches is harmful, even if you don't believe. A homosexual should know how harmful his choice is just by showing the lifestyle will probably shorten his life. You can brow beat him all day with scripture and he will just be more convinced you are the problem, not him. All statistics show they die younger and are more unhappy because of it. The same with stem cells. Adult stem cells work, embryonic don't. The thing is, they want to kill babies,...as many as possible. They want you to believe it is a good thing. When a stem cell triupmh is proclaimed, they don't mention it was an adult stem cell success. When there is a failure, nothing is announced.

Most people would agree that stealing isn't a good thing, but where is the outrage at adultery? We haven't made the case that adultery is a life destroyer. "Everybody does it", even preachers. Ask someone who is about to jump off a bridge because they lost their wife and family how "good" it was.

One humorous epiphany for myself was when the Bible says, I place before you death and life, blessing and cursing.......Choose life!" God has to tell us to choose life, we are so stupid. I had this picture of a guy tapping his foot, thinking with one of those bubbles above his head, "do I really want to live or die?" "Death may be alright, better than this stinking life I have". Some of us are so stupid, we need God to tell us what seems to be obvious.

To a believer, the Bible is God's knowledge passed to His children. To a non believer, it is of no more value than a Harry Potter novel. We should be able to win an argument using the knowledge of God, without just quoting chapter and verse. Satan is a lier and a confuser. That is why he leaves out the facts and uses spin to convince the weak minded. If I showed someone a pile of guts and body parts and told them this is an abortion, how else can they be so stupid to believe it wasn't a child? It had a heartbeat, brainwaves, it's own fingerprints, it's own blood type and DNA. All these "facts" are just as viable in court as saying a child is a gift from God.

If you explain that a homosexual has sex with human feces all over himself, how can they believe they won't get a disease? Try to imagine the smell and cleanup after their "lovemaking". How can they believe that's normal? They have been lied to so long, they don't grasp reality anymore. It makes Christians cringe to hear these things, but the homosexuals aren't going to tell you what they do. Try sending them to some websites that show them cutting themselves with razors after a rubber band was used to kill their sex organs or using Crisco in ways it was never meant to be used. They cannot explain how that isn't an abomination. When you turn the light on, the roaches run to find a hiding place. Right now, darkness prevails.

119 posted on 11/15/2006 11:04:06 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
Good luck with that reading comprehension problem though. G'nite.

You can't possibly be this dense.

You started out with an attitude of arrogant condescension riding on a raft of false statements (which I patiently rebutted with facts) and finally you get around to the ad hominem. Sooner or later people show themselves for what they are.

FWIW I did read the article you FINALLY gave a link to, after umpteen verbose and rambling posts, and it far exceeds the WND article in proving the author's contention that Christian influence on our nation's law and founding is being laundered out of history. If you had an ounce of common sense or decency you would have pointed everyone to that link at the beginning of your little jihad on my reading skills.

120 posted on 11/15/2006 11:08:35 AM PST by TigersEye (Ego chatters endlessly on. Mind speaks in great silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson