Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I want to Thank all "Conservative" Non-Voters
November 18, 2006 | new yorker 77

Posted on 11/18/2006 8:26:57 PM PST by new yorker 77

Thank you for giving us blanket amnesty for illegals.

Thank you for courageously abandoning our troops.

Thank you for handing victory to the terrorists.

Thank you for guaranteeing higher taxes.

Thank you for guaranteeing no more conservative judges.

Thank you for empowering John McCain.

Thank you for bringing back universal health care.

Thank you for endless investigations.

Most of all, I want to thank you for showing complete disregard for the tens of thousands who spilled their blood to give you your right to vote.

Your callous, self-serving apathy has guaranteed the government actions that you so bitterly complained about.


A final reality check to all you non-voters who still call your self conservative:

You are not a conservative.
You define un-American.
You define un-patriotic.
Please stop pretending to care about the troops.


To all you people who actually voted.

Thank you for defending our Constitution.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: blamesothers; crybaby; demswinrinosinoffice; hewhosmeltitdealtit; idiotny77; illegalimmigration; infiltration; invasion; jerrybrownsweiner; lame; lamevanity; mindreaderspeaks; moron; notagain; nutwanker77; reconquista; retardedpost; rinodemocrat; rinolover; seanvanity; soreloserman; spitevoters; takeastand; thankyou; thisguyprojects; vanity; whaaa; yourwelcome; zottherinocrybaby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-313 next last
To: new yorker 77
To all you people who actually voted.

Thank you for defending our Constitution.

Does that include those who voted Democrat?

And as long as we're at it, thank YOU for your self-righteous, pompous, superficial analysis of the election. While you're blaming people, you might try taking a look at some of the candidates. THEY were what conservative voters rejected.

And with arrogant claptrap like this bouncing around inside those empty RINO skulls, you'll likely see a repeat come Election 08.

81 posted on 11/18/2006 9:38:02 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blake#1

This isn't the first time he's betrayed Republicans. I heard him do exactly the same thing a few years back - he preached about the importance of voting, the evil of liberals, and the like. The day before elections he started ranting about, "Nobody's any good, just don't vote. You can show 'em."

I haven't listened to him since.


82 posted on 11/18/2006 9:39:57 PM PST by Spyder (Libertarian but vote Republican to avoid a welfare state takeover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

You said what a lot of us have been wanting to.


83 posted on 11/18/2006 9:40:05 PM PST by Flora McDonald (Stand The Storm!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Don't bother, they won't hear you over the cacophony of self congratulations still going on.....
84 posted on 11/18/2006 9:40:17 PM PST by Uriah_lost (We've got enough youth, how about a "fountain of smart")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malsua

To: new yorker 77

and I want to say EFF YOU since I didn't vote for any rinos


12 posted on 11/18/2006 10:36:01 PM CST by Malsua


You can be sure that lots of RINOs didn't vote for conservatives, either. "'Republicans' for ___________ (add Dem name)" were out in full force in this election. They're usually good for at least a few full page ads for the RATs.


85 posted on 11/18/2006 9:42:24 PM PST by EternalVigilance (I'll stop believing in fences when they tear down the one around the White House...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: billbears
... blindly pull a lever based on the sole fact of keeping the other party out. Gotcha.

You can voice and vote your principles at the primary level. If your guy can't pull it off there, he probably can't pull a majority nationally either. Don't take your ball/vote and go home.

I can't stomach McCain, but if he wins the primaries I'll hold my nose and black in the circle next to his name to keep Hillary/Edwards/et al OUT!

86 posted on 11/18/2006 9:43:26 PM PST by Spyder (Libertarian but vote Republican to avoid a welfare state takeover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Well, I voted and Peter King-R was re-elected. Got my parents to vote for him as well. Straight Republican-ticket.


87 posted on 11/18/2006 9:43:38 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #88 Removed by Moderator

To: new yorker 77

Good listen!

http://www.newt.org/mediafiles/iNewt_110906_electionreaction.mp3


89 posted on 11/18/2006 9:44:01 PM PST by MaineVoter2002 (www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Not Cool Man...


90 posted on 11/18/2006 9:44:15 PM PST by MassachusettsGOP (May the West and Republicans Always Win...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
Replace "conservative non-voter" with GOP and you would be closer to correct. The GOP has to get votes. Complaining about votes they didn't get serves absolutely no purpose whatsoever. It is the GOP that let everyone down, not some mythical block of "conservative non-voters" The sooner we conservatives get this, the better. We need a GOP that cares about the things you listed and more.

You don't get it.

We lost tpp many conservative seats in the House.

91 posted on 11/18/2006 9:46:53 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

I know lots of conservatives. Overwhelmingly, they not only voted, they manned the phones, knocked on doors, contributed to candidates, etc. On the other hand, I know of lots of RINOs who whined and did everything they could to undercut our conservative candidates and help the Dems.

I don't have much use for those who continually try to blame conservatives for the problems in this country, instead of blaming those who deserve it: Liberals in both parties.

Beyond that, blaming the voters is kind of a losers game anyway.


92 posted on 11/18/2006 9:46:56 PM PST by EternalVigilance (I'll stop believing in fences when they tear down the one around the White House...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Look man,
I voted straight Republican in New York City. It was a completely futile exercise in liberty. These people really want to turn our country into one big Hillary Care nanny state. This city exports its values to the rest of the country via the media. The MSM has pounded Bush since he won reelection with Katrina and Iraq. They succeeded in brainwashing the moderates(not hard to do). I am surprised and disgusted with the number of Conservative talk show hosts who abandoned ship after the big loss. What, can't handle a fight?
93 posted on 11/18/2006 9:49:12 PM PST by zeller the zealot (Are Republicans the Party of Life, or is that too risky?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spyder
You can voice and vote your principles at the primary level

In theory yes. Except in most cases when the party has chosen the candidate they want. Example Elizabeth Dole. And I wouldn't cast a vote for that woman if you paid me.

Don't take your ball/vote and go home.

Never have. I vote for the candidate who I believe will represent my views in Congress. In most cases, it is the Libertarian candidate or I write in someone. If I don't find an acceptable candidate in that race I don't vote in that race

I can't stomach McCain, but if he wins the primaries I'll hold my nose and black in the circle next to his name to keep Hillary/Edwards/et al OUT!

Yes because we all know the Framers intended for us to treat political debate like a team sport. And the main cause of voting was to keep the other candidate out. Yep, that's exactly how we were intended to vote. Rah, rah, our team!!!

94 posted on 11/18/2006 9:49:14 PM PST by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: JayVan
I'm so sick and tired of people blaming the voters for the GOP's loss.

Plenty of good conservatives lost in the election. The voters are to blame for that.

Can't get much simpler than that.

95 posted on 11/18/2006 9:50:36 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan

I expect we will be seeing some changes with Mitch McConnell and John Boehner. Those that criticize Boehner probably don't realize he helped Newt write the Contract with America and was hampered by Denny Hastert. I expect we will be seeing changes in the House as well. My Congressman was elected to head NRCC and you can take it to the bank, winning back the house just became more of a reality.

This from Rep John Boehner's background and why I expect him to be an effective leader much more so then Hastert:

During his tenure in the House, he has worked consistently to reform the federal government. His first two terms in the House were marked by an aggressive campaign to clean up Congress and make it more accountable to the American people. In fact, during his freshman year, Boehner and fellow members of the reform-minded "Gang of Seven" took on the House establishment and successfully closed the House Bank, uncovered "dine-and-dash" practices at the House Restaurant, and exposed drug sales and cozy cash-for-stamps deals at the House Post Office.

John was also active in education reform issues, despite serving in the minority at the time. In 1994, he passed legislation with strong bipartisan support allowing school districts to use their Title I funds for public school choice programs, under which parents could choose which public school their children would attend. Later, John was instrumental in crafting the Contract with America, the bold 100-day agenda for the 104th Congress that nationalized the 1994 elections. One of the Contract's cornerstones - the Congressional Accountability Act, requiring Congress to live under the same rules and regulations as the rest of the nation - bears the unmistakable imprint of his drive to reform the House.


96 posted on 11/18/2006 9:52:32 PM PST by PhiKapMom ( Go Sooners! Rudy 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

You had your say after this disasterous election. Now, how does it differ from what Reagan would say?

http://www.conservative.org/pressroom/reagan/reagan1975.asp


97 posted on 11/18/2006 9:53:02 PM PST by MaineVoter2002 (www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Thank the corrupt and ineffective Republican leadership.


98 posted on 11/18/2006 9:55:07 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

"The voters are to blame for that."

Oh well, time for some new voters, I guess. /sarc


99 posted on 11/18/2006 9:56:27 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: MassachusettsGOP
[ Not Cool Man... ]

LoL.. What is it?........ the water?...
Something in the water?..

100 posted on 11/18/2006 9:59:17 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-313 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson