Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FAA issues 1st-ever space tourism rules
Yahoo News /AP ^ | December 15, 2006 | ERICA WERNER

Posted on 12/16/2006 11:11:41 AM PST by Stoat

FAA issues 1st-ever space tourism rules

By ERICA WERNER, Associated Press Writer Fri Dec 15, 6:40 PM ET
 

WASHINGTON - Thrill-seekers looking to blast into space would need to be informed in writing of serious risks — including death — and promise not to sue the government under the first-ever rules for commercial space travel.

The rules issued Friday by the Federal Aviation Administration mandate training and medical fitness evaluations for crew members, preflight testing and other steps companies must take before getting licenses to carry paying passengers into the beyond.

The rules apply to American companies launching from anywhere in the world, and to foreign companies launching from U.S. soil.

Virgin Galactic, run by British entrepreneur Richard Branson, is aiming to offer out-of-this-world vacations in 2008 for travelers willing to pay $200,000 apiece. Space Adventures Ltd. of Vienna, Va., is making similar plans, as are other outfits.

The FAA regulations were required under legislation Congress passed two years ago, in the wake of the successful 2004 flights of a privately financed manned rocket over California's Mojave Desert.

For now, the flights aren't required to be safe for passengers. Lawmakers were concerned that safety requirements would hamper innovation in the infant industry, and settled on informed consent for the early years of paid space travel. The FAA was given the authority to begin regulating for passenger safety in eight years, or if an accident causing serious injury or death happened before then.

"Private human space flight will be an unparalleled adventure," said FAA Administrator Marion C. Blakey. "In an environment where some level of risk will always be present, this action underscores the FAA's firm commitment to public safety."

The entrepreneurs competing to fly people into space have been pushing for the rules to establish a legal framework for their ventures. There are already rules for private-sector space endeavors such as satellite launches, but until now, no legal jurisdiction for regulating commercial human spaceflight.

"One of the key priorities here is regulatory certainty. Investors and engineers and spaceport operators all want to know ahead of time what the rules are that we're going to be dealing with here," said Rich Pournelle, director of business development at XCOR Aerospace, a launch vehicle developer in California that's working with Space Adventures.

Under the new rules, which take effect Feb. 13, companies will be required to be insured. Passengers must be informed in writing about the risks of the vehicle type they're using, and that space travel in general carries the risk of death or serious injury. No limitations are imposed on who can be a space tourist, but basic training for passengers must be provided.

Existing rules for commercial space travel aim to the ensure safety for people on the ground, including by restricting flights over heavily populated areas.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; awrospace; faa; science; space; spaceflight; spacetourism; spacetravel; travel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
See also:

FAA sets rules for tourism in space

(preliminary)

. Aero-News Network The Aviation and Aerospace World's Daily-Real-Time News and Information Service .

FAA Issues Revised Final Rule For Commercial Spaceflight

Fri, 15 Dec '06

Establishes New Part 460 Guidelines For Flight Crews

After receiving comments from The FAA received comments from 42 entities, including aerospace companies, associations, service providers, individuals and other agencies of the US Government, the Federal Aviation Administration has issued its Final Rule on regulations that will govern commercial spaceflight.

Operators of launch and reentry vehicles who provided comments to the agency include:

  • Blue Origin, LLC (Blue Origin)
  • The Personal Spaceflight Federation 2 (Federation)
  • Rocketplane Limited, Inc. (Rocketplane)
  • TGV Rockets, Inc.
  • XCOR Aerospace (XCOR)

The following associations, individuals and service providers also commented: Airline Pilots Association International (ALPA); Association of Space Explorers-USA (ASE), International Association of Space Entrepreneurs and Institute for Space Law and Policy (IASE and ISLAP); Knutson & Associates, Attorneys at Law (Knutson); Nickolaus Leggett (Leggett); Planehook Aviation Services, LLC (Planehook); Predesa, LLC (Predesa) and James Snead.

In general, the commenters supported the proposed requirements announced in August, but with several suggested changes.

In its final rule, the FAA changes parts 401, 415, 431, 435 and 440 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and establishes a new part 460 in response to the Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of 2004 (CSLAA) requirement to issue regulations governing crew and space flight participant, by June 23, 2006.

Part 460 applies to anyone applying for or having a license or permit under Title 14 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Chapter III, who conducts a flight with crew or space flight participants onboard a vehicle, or employs a remote operator of a vehicle with a human on board. This part also applies to a space flight participant or crew member participating in an activity authorized under 14 CFR Chapter III.

The new Part 460 also defines crew and flight crew and imposes notification, medical, qualification, and training requirements. It also specifies informed consent and training requirements for space flight participants.

The FAA originally stated all pilots of commercial spaceflight vehicles would be required to hold an instrument rating. The industry responded, however, that in many cases that requirement may not be enough. Some companies suggested those requirements be should be made more restrictive -- like requiring all spacecraft pilots to be test pilots, for example.

Other companies said that for their operations, however -- such as automated launch operations that return to Earth under a parachute, where no actual "piloting" would actually take place -- that requirement might be too restrictive.

The Final Rule also clarifies the definition and requirements for pilots controlling a spacecraft by remote control -- essentially, for personnel at Mission Control facilities.

The document is 31 pages long... and contains enough government-speak to satisfy the most ardent bureaucrat. But it's well worth the time to read it... after all, these rules are what many of us hope will govern our own flights to the stars, someday!

FMI: Read The Full Document (.pdf)
 
 

1 posted on 12/16/2006 11:11:44 AM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Update Ping


2 posted on 12/16/2006 11:13:16 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Space Tourists, charter members of the 100 mile high club.


3 posted on 12/16/2006 11:15:05 AM PST by Rb ver. 2.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

How can they do this? Does the U.S. rule space? Is the FAA the only authority on space travel on earth?


4 posted on 12/16/2006 11:18:58 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
How can they do this? Does the U.S. rule space? Is the FAA the only authority on space travel on earth?

No, foreign companies launching on foreign soil aren't subject to these regulations.

The rules apply to American companies launching from anywhere in the world, and to foreign companies launching from U.S. soil.

5 posted on 12/16/2006 11:25:50 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
How can they do this?

They are The Government; they can do what they please  :-)

 Does the U.S. rule space?

Not yet, unfortunately, but the FAA does 'rule' (oversee) public and private air travel engaged in by U.S. companies and launching from US soil.

 Is the FAA the only authority on space travel on earth?

No, but if you'll read the article, you'll notice that these rules apply to U.S. -based corporations and flights from US soil.

Other international agencies will likely issue rules for other corporations and for flights from other nations.

6 posted on 12/16/2006 11:26:34 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stoat; Bob
No, but if you'll read the article, you'll notice that these rules apply to U.S. -based corporations and flights from US soil.

That was obvious. It's the headline. It implies that the FAA is the final authority.

7 posted on 12/16/2006 11:28:47 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bob; Stoat
The rules apply to American companies launching from anywhere in the world, and to foreign companies launching from U.S. soil.

Hmmmmm.... "from anywhere in the world". Maybe they do think they are the final authority.

8 posted on 12/16/2006 11:30:27 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
That was obvious. It's the headline.

In that case, I'm not sure what your objection is.

 


 

9 posted on 12/16/2006 11:30:57 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Hmmmmm.... "from anywhere in the world". Maybe they do think they are the final authority.
 

It appears to be a similar level of authority that the FAA already exercises over conventional aircraft.

10 posted on 12/16/2006 11:34:35 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Space travel transits the atmosphere.

If you have the money you might be able to get a ride on a Soviet rocket.

For what its worth, I would feel much better on a Russian rocket than the very marginal SpaceshipOne series of vehicles, and those are sub-orbital anyway.


11 posted on 12/16/2006 11:45:05 AM PST by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Aren't these the same sorts of idiots who have all those international rules about who owns what in space? Like the Altairians care.


12 posted on 12/16/2006 11:45:21 AM PST by Seruzawa (Marx's Das Kapital never could compete with the Sears catalog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
How can they do this? Does the U.S. rule space?

1. How can they do this?
Corporations are Constitutional legal persons created under the USA. FedGov makes the rules for all persons under its jurisdiction, especially legal persons.

2. Does the U.S. rule space?
By Treaty, the USA has asserted ownership of the entire universe, seen and unseen.

13 posted on 12/16/2006 11:53:34 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa
Aren't these the same sorts of idiots who have all those international rules about who owns what in space?

My recollection is that concepts such as the political disposition of the Moon, etc, are enumerated under various United Nations treaties.

 Like the Altairians care.

When the Altarians establish a US -based spaceflight corporation and / or engage in flights from US soil, then they will care.  If they don't, then they will find themselves in violation of FAA rules just like anyone else.

14 posted on 12/16/2006 11:54:21 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
By Treaty, the USA has asserted ownership of the entire universe, seen and unseen.

And that makes me feel so warm and happy inside   :-)

15 posted on 12/16/2006 11:55:48 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Do they have to bring their liquids in little 3oz. containers?

-PJ

16 posted on 12/16/2006 11:58:16 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Doesn't it though? It's also good to know that repealing the 1967 Treaty would not affect the assertion of ownership, which would continue until further specific action annuls it.


17 posted on 12/16/2006 12:00:00 PM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Do they have to bring their liquids in little 3oz. containers?

I'm guessing that all conventional flight regulations will apply unless specified otherwise in the FAA rules.

Hopefully we will have a few years of "hot stewardesses" on commercial spaceflights before the NOW gang ruins it   :-)

AskMen.com - Hot stewardesses

(Top Ten "Hot Stewardess" airlines)


18 posted on 12/16/2006 12:06:18 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
My recollection is that concepts such as the political disposition of the Moon, etc, are enumerated under various United Nations treaties.

Yeah, that's right. They set the rules for occupying the entire universe. Sort of like the Pope.

19 posted on 12/16/2006 12:13:14 PM PST by Seruzawa (Marx's Das Kapital never could compete with the Sears catalog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Probably more like this:

-PJ

20 posted on 12/16/2006 12:24:08 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson