Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ancient burial ground discovered during duck hunt[Oklahoma]
Benton County Daily Record ^ | 09 Jan 2007 | Jeff Della Rosa

Posted on 01/10/2007 11:02:36 PM PST by FLOutdoorsman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2007 11:02:39 PM PST by FLOutdoorsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

ping


2 posted on 01/10/2007 11:03:42 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLOutdoorsman

So that is where Dick Cheney hides the bodies!;-)


3 posted on 01/10/2007 11:08:31 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
I was wondering how long it would take for Dick Cheney to appear in this thread.
4 posted on 01/10/2007 11:10:02 PM PST by FLOutdoorsman (The Man who says it can't be done should not interrupt the man doing it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FLOutdoorsman; girlangler; mallardx

Neat stuff. I wonder if he got lucky and shot a limit too!


5 posted on 01/10/2007 11:17:20 PM PST by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLOutdoorsman

I wonder what possessed them to think they were remains that would belong to the Caddos or Wichitas? They tended to range further south and west, even 1000 years ago. This is forested area and they were open plains Indians, even into Kansas, to the north, but in the western part. The tools sound like Plains tools, too.

Eastern Oklahoma and western Arkansas had been Cherokee for maybe 300 years. Maybe it was some Caddoan (not necessarily the Caddos or Wichitas themselves) or a Delaware-Lenape tribal family that came from the east.

I suppose if they dig more and find some mounds, that might answer the question - or they already know there are some. Hunh - interesting, anyway.

I caught my very first fish as a tiny kiddo at Spavinaw! Then promptly fell down *splat* in the watercress at the shoreline, just me and my little perch and short-stuff rod/reel.


6 posted on 01/10/2007 11:57:36 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rte66
The tools in the article "sound like plains" but in fact they sound like tools from any site. The description is generic- who didn't have scrapers, nutting stones and knives? There is mention of pottery and it is this which probably gave the clue since pottery types are distinctive and well known cultural markers, to a greater degree than even lithic styles.
7 posted on 01/11/2007 12:24:21 AM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: piasa

The size of the grinding table was massive. Eastern natives had finer-tuned and smaller-scaled tools. That's all I meant - just from things I've seen and known about.


8 posted on 01/11/2007 12:30:06 AM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

They probably mean this small site is caddo as in "Spiro mounds caddoan" but I don't think people have settled to whom exactly the Spiro mounds era "caddo" are really related; the old theory was they were ancestors of the modern Caddo and Witchita but it's in dispute- they may be more akin to other peoples northeast of them all the way up to Illinois. Certainly the people from the Arkansas basin are linked in some fashion- and Spiro seems to have been a trade hub or gateway in the midst of this basin where finished goods passed from places like Cahokia with its numerous copper and shell workshop sites and huge caches of chert drills in return for something- some say Spiro may have been the conduit through which flowed soft bison hair for textiles, meat, bow d'arc staves for bows, etc, since we're not sure. Spiro is lacking in workshop sites but abounds in exotic finished goods. Trade in perishable products from their region and from the west is most likely the reason but it could be that goods went to Spiro for other cultural needs- a form of tribute, a kind of religious sacrifice at what may have been considered a special site, or reasons we can't understand yet.


9 posted on 01/11/2007 1:00:01 AM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FLOutdoorsman

The site will be declared historical and he just hunted his very last season there.


10 posted on 01/11/2007 1:04:53 AM PST by djf (Democracy - n, def: The group that gets PAID THE MOST ends up VOTING THE MOST See: TRAGEDY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

I don't think it is Caddo or Wichita either. These tribes were assigned to reservations there but that was in the late 1800's. If these findings are 1000 years old they have to be some other tribe.


11 posted on 01/11/2007 4:07:38 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FLOutdoorsman
“ Holy crap, this is a burial ground, ” Austin said to himself.

I have always wondered how one disposes of 'holy crap'.

12 posted on 01/11/2007 6:26:07 AM PST by norwaypinesavage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

***I wonder what possessed them to think they were remains that would belong to the Caddos or Wichitas?***

Possibly Osage?


13 posted on 01/11/2007 7:42:40 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: piasa

The time I've spent at Spiro itself was somewhat of a waste, as I didn't really know a lot of "big picture" background as to what I was learning until much later, when I got into my own genealogy.

I am Chickasaw and do not consider myself related to Caddo or Wichita, as we were Muskogean in language family. Our historic homeland is around the Tennessee River in NW Alabama and NE Mississippi.

I consider us part of the "Southern Cult" or Mississippian culture - however, some say we came from west of the Mississippi in the ancient, and probably originated around the Red River valley, like the "Caddoan" cultures, before migrating eastward.

One thing, though, we were not mound builders and there is nothing in our anasazi origin stories indicating that we ever were. That's why I am so often in dispute about that.

After Removal, we were originally part of the Choctaw Nation, then "got our own place" - but we own half of the Arkansas River. I believe Spavinaw is in the Arkansas watershed, although it might be the Grand River - I'd have to look.

Anyway, I dislike that these ancient artifacts would just be handed over to the Caddo-Wichita tribes, no questions asked. I looked at the Caddo Nation website just now, at least the one sponsored by their Texas portion, and could not believe the hyperbole they've written.

You would think they are the only Indian tribe in the US and that they invented everything and saved the white man from every other evil Indian - and made the most fabulous pottery in the world! They are laying claim to everything that has ever been labeled "Caddoan" as their own modern-day tribe's birthright! Harrumph.


14 posted on 01/11/2007 7:46:28 AM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight

No - we're talking about the "ancient lands" of each of the tribes. I can't explain it all very quickly, I'm kinda too close to the trees and not good at simplifying it.


15 posted on 01/11/2007 7:49:29 AM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: djf

Who is the entity that will declare it 'historical'?
The reason I'm asking in 1889 while building my barn, 40 skulls were found on my property (according to an old newspaper report). No further information was available and I wish I could bury, so to speak, that information due to the possible ramifications.


16 posted on 01/11/2007 7:51:54 AM PST by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Well, that would made *some* sense. Especially considering the bois d'arc bow wood - however, that's all over eastern Oklahoma and east Texas.

And their ancient lands are not where their reservation is now - although they were just a little farther east. I've lived in the Osage, but don't know much about the tribe in prehistory.

In the back of my mind, I think they are possibly Iroquoian in language family - more like Cherokees. Could be wrong about that. I don't believe they are Muskogean or Caddoan, however. Perhaps our Freeper O.O. will correct me.


17 posted on 01/11/2007 7:54:19 AM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FLOutdoorsman
He later learned that it was used more than 1, 000 years ago by Caddo and Wichita Indians as a nut-cracking tool.

Another 1,000-year-old nut-cracking tool.

18 posted on 01/11/2007 7:56:55 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (A living insult to islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

Where are you talking about? Like, what state?


19 posted on 01/11/2007 8:10:39 AM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

Ohio


20 posted on 01/11/2007 10:20:13 AM PST by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson