Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defeatists On Free Republic Who Are Giving Aid and Comfort to the Enemy
January 18 2007 | jveritas

Posted on 01/18/2007 7:50:55 AM PST by jveritas

The most lasting tragedy of the Vietnam War is that it has legitimized “giving aid and comfort to the enemy”. We are seeing the giving of aid and comfort to the enemy running wild in this war on terror and sadly not only among liberals and their media but also among some conservatives who some of them are right here on this great Free Republic.

When Al Qaeda terrorists, or the terrorist regimes in Iran and Syria, or the Iraqi insurgent terrorists whether they are Sunnis or Shia hear the speeches of defeatism coming from liberals and their media, or unfortunately coming from some conservatives who some of them are right here on Free Republic, will they feel comforted and aided by these speeches? Of course they will be comforted, and they will be embolden to fight more and more, kill more and more, destroy more and more, because they realize that many Americans do not have the will to fight a long and hard war.

Defeatism and providing aid and comfort to the enemy was something that we expected from liberals and their media because their hate to President Bush and the Republican Party is hundred of times more than their hate to the terrorists. However it is really sad that some conservatives and some members on this great forum are doing their share in providing aid and comfort to the enemy through their defeatist attitude.

Do the defeatists want to amend the Constitution so we will have the following? Stop the war and leave if we lose more than one thousand troops, or stop the war and leave if it lasts more than one year, or stop the war and leave if it costs more than 50 billions dollars, whichever comes first. Do they want to do this?

The defeatists who argue that Iraq is not part of the war on terror but rather it is just a civil war between Sunnis and Shia are wrong and naive beyond belief. Iraq is most definitely the central and most important front in the war on terror. It is in Iraq where Al Qaeda and their local Iraqi allies decided to fight the US. It is in Iraq where the islamic terrorists from all over the world are pouring in to fight the Americans. It is in Iraq where the terrorist regimes of Iran and Syria and their local Iraqi allies want to defeat the US so they can have total control of the Middle East. Since the terrorists are all over the world, then the best way to fight them is to attract them to one place to kill them. Whether it was planned or not, Iraq turned out to be the magnet that has been attracting the terrorists from all over the world, and that is the ultimate way to fight the war on terror and to kill as many terrorists as we can.

Every defeatist who is giving aid and comfort to the enemy should ask himself or herself this question: What will happen if we leave Iraq before we achieve complete victory? The First thing that will happen is that the enemy will be embolden beyond belief and the terrorists whether they are Sunnis or Shia, whether they are Al Qaeda, or Iran or Syria, will be given the ultimate victory that will embolden them thousands more time then when they were emboldened when the US left Beirut after the Marines barracks terrorist attack in 1983, or when the US left Somalia in 1993 after the terrorist killed 19 troops, or when no reprisal happened against the terrorists when they attacked many American targets through out the Clinton years. If our passiveness to the past terrorist attacks emboldened them in such a way to attack us on 9/11, think about what they can do to us if we give and leave Iraq and thus handle them the ultimate victory that they have been dreaming about for decades.

The defeatists must understand that if few terrorists sitting in a cave in Afghanistan with a small budget and few volunteers were able to do the 9/11 terrorist attacks, killed 3000 Americans, and caused over one trillion dollars in economic damages, then the terrorists control of Iraq and of the whole Middle East, and its vast oil resources will allow them to conduct terrorist attacks against us that we cannot imagine even in our worst nightmares. By controlling Iraq and the Middle East the terrorists will have hundreds of billions of dollars under their control that they will use it to attack us everywhere in the world and the US and cause unimaginable death, destruction and economic losses that will make 9/11 terrorist attacks look like a picnic in comparison. They will also use the oil weapon to bring the world economy to a disaster that will be many folds worse than that of the 1929 Depression.

Fellow Free Republic members, we are fighting the most important war since WW II. We are not fighting for the Iraqis in Iraq but we are fighting for ourselves, for our freedom and for our way of life. Let us all support our President and our brave troops because they need our support now more than ever.


TOPICS: War on Terror; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bush; bushhaterswin; cultureofcorruption; cultureofcutandrun; cutandrunls; defeatism; iraq; iraqbackstabbers; jveritas; lbackstabbers; losertarians; securetheborders; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 621-635 next last
To: AliVeritas
hey Ali....have been popping in and out...constant interruptions at work, I'm afraid. Lucky if I get to FReep for longer than 15 mins at a time...hope that you and all the Ali's are doing great...

btw, thanks for the heads ups such as the UK Undercover Doc...fascinating stuff

261 posted on 01/18/2007 10:36:30 AM PST by sofaman (How long was I in the army? Five foot eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy

"Losing" in Iraq probably means losing Israel and allowing Iran to develop as much of a nuclear weapon and delivery system as their oil money can afford that will eventually, and not a long eventually, be capable of reaching the continental US. Our anti missile system might be much better then than it is now but it would be better to forestall the problem than to have to rely on countering it. And Russia will be helping a successful Iran that has beaten or proved immune to America.


262 posted on 01/18/2007 10:37:30 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thank you, again, Mr. Freeper of the Year.

BTTT.


263 posted on 01/18/2007 10:38:38 AM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher
But you acknowledge that it's true. So it really shouldn't matter if the libs say it.

Having the right to do something doesn't mean one should automatically do it. With rights come responsibility. People want the former but don't want to exercise the latter.

How do we balance civil liberty with civic responsibility in a time of war?

Patriotic citizens will take into account the consequences of exercising their right to criticize. Unpatriotic citizens don't care about the consequences, especially to others. They just want to open their yaps up and grab some attention.

264 posted on 01/18/2007 10:40:07 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: McGruff; kristinn
Here is another McCarhty charge!

Anyway McCarthy was right.

265 posted on 01/18/2007 10:40:52 AM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Emboldened the disrupters and trolls around here, too.


266 posted on 01/18/2007 10:41:08 AM PST by pinz-n-needlez (Jack Bauer wears Tony Snow pajamas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: soccer8; billbears
Soccrer:

You are exactly correct. Also we need to be careful that some defeatist hide their defeatism under the "Macho Talk" but at the end they say everything is lost, we cannot win, let us leave, etc....

267 posted on 01/18/2007 10:42:56 AM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
You are correct philosophically...but wrong functionally. If the President is not supported in this...any lack of support for him is automatically perceived as support for the Democrat plan.

The press is not capable of grasping the nuance, and if we do not at LEAST support what the President is proposing, the funding will be cut and we will lose something we MUST win.

It may not be what we want, but it is what it is and to fail to understand that is to undermine the war effort. You've got only two choices...support the President, or support the Dems. There are NO other options at this point. How you respond to that, is the difference between winning and losing.
268 posted on 01/18/2007 10:45:06 AM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Bravo.

That needed to be said.

Bumperoo!


269 posted on 01/18/2007 10:46:16 AM PST by roaddog727 (BullS##t does not get bridges built)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tokra
We won't get a few days respite next time. The liberals learned from their mistake, and they are all ready to blame the President if we are attacked again.

Look at their behavior after Katrina, and you can see the game plan for the next 9/11. I believe they will be on TV IMMEDIATELY blaming the President.

There are no second chances. Any new attack won't cause the unification of this country; the Rats and the media will make sure we are at each others' throats.

270 posted on 01/18/2007 10:49:25 AM PST by Miss Marple (Prayers for Jemian's son,: Lord, please keep him safe and bring him home .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish
How you respond to that, is the difference between winning and losing.

No, it's the difference between losing quickly, and losing in a long drawn out delaying action.

Which is still a valid difference of course....

271 posted on 01/18/2007 10:50:13 AM PST by Doghouse Riley (No war unless it's total war for total victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

--“Defeatists” unfortunately are very loud and they are all over the place--

Kudos, JV, for carrying on the good fight. I'm with you 1000%.

Just like Vietnam, Defeatists are trying to turn victory into a loss, and gloat about it later. After the Paris Peace Accords, there was a basic understanding with the North that if they #$%@d with South Vietnam they'd get bombed back to the Paleolithic.

The only "loss" in Vietnam was after the wussiest Congress in history (up to now, perhaps) stabbed our ally in the back and stupidly voted to cut off ALL funding (not just military).

The worst thing that can happen now is for reasonable Americans to similarly jump on the MaimScream Media's bandwagon, and join the UpChuck Hagels of the world in caving to the Defeatocrats.


272 posted on 01/18/2007 10:52:10 AM PST by rfp1234 (Custom-built for Bill Clinton: the new Toyota Priapus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative; jveritas
Good morning.
"I don't like being scolded for not thinking exactly like an individual or group thinks I should."

I wasn't scolding you for your position, just defining it and your response here confirms my understanding of it. Whatever you believe about the war, what you are saying is that we are fighting it wrong and are losing which is pretty much the point of jveritas' rant. jveritas might have been scolding you but only if you accept his statements as applying to you. Do they?

I say you are misreading what is happening in Iraq but you still the right to be wrong. You also have the right to feel as offended as you choose, right or wrong.

If my post bothers you, hit the abuse button. I really don't see either of us doing that, but you never know.

Michael Frazier
273 posted on 01/18/2007 10:52:53 AM PST by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; kristinn
Threads like this one are a good bait :)

OK, JV, you baited me!! LOL

I took some flak on kristinn's Thanksgiving thread and others when I said that this CIC will not leave office without bombing Iran and that is absolutely necessary for a win in Iraq, solving nagging problems in the ME and sending a strong message to Russia, China and North Korea. All this is in the interest of our national security. We'll see soon enough.

I don't mind opposing opinions but I minded the personal attacks precipitated, in a large part, by ignorance about the ME.

274 posted on 01/18/2007 10:56:08 AM PST by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Doghouse Riley; jveritas
So, you are saying losing is inevitable?

I guess you are determined to prove jveritas's point.

275 posted on 01/18/2007 10:57:27 AM PST by Miss Marple (Prayers for Jemian's son,: Lord, please keep him safe and bring him home .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Take off the gloves and fight like we did in WW II. A elongated war that includes pacification and appeasement of in-country officials only gets more of our military men and women killed. I am for total victory and if the civilians are part of the logistics supply train for the enemy then they are the enemy and should be dealt with accordingly.
276 posted on 01/18/2007 10:57:53 AM PST by NY Attitude (You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas; Spirochete

Exactly AV, freeper spirochette showed us how to be a DEFEATSIT.


277 posted on 01/18/2007 10:58:07 AM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Owen
Anyone who ever utters something like . . . "maybe its best if Hillary wins because that will teach America a lesson and we'll come out ahead in the long run as a result" . . . probably is a candidate for banning. This is the kind of thing that is intended to sap intensity.

*************

Interesting proposal. I'm not sure if I agree, but it's worthy of consideration.

278 posted on 01/18/2007 10:58:13 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
I ask my fellow Freepers to read this link: Talks about Iwo Jima.

The scale of our losses there, might bring Iraq into perspective a little.

http://www.military.com/NewContent/0,13190,NI_Iwo_Jima,00.html

279 posted on 01/18/2007 11:02:28 AM PST by agincourt1415 (GATORS National Champions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Its sad that anyone in the FReeper community paying attention to any of your facts and translations could come up with a different conclusions on the War in Iraq therefor capitulating to the monsters in the drive by media.

My guess is they were not paying attention

People need to take another look at the politics behind the Iraq Study Group and the 911 Commission.


280 posted on 01/18/2007 11:04:35 AM PST by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 621-635 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson