Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black Surprises (USAF can take control of enemy missile launchers, radars, etc.)
aviationnow.com ^ | January, 2007 | David A. Fulghum, Michael A. Dornheim & William B. Scott

Posted on 01/24/2007 6:54:09 PM PST by steve86

Other, more contemporary Senior programs named by Arkin reveal and track the Air Force's growing interest in and development of the new field of computer network warfare and electronic attack, which include Senior Keystone (related to classified information warfare) and Senior Suter. However, the Air Force's theme remains the same--penetrating the enemy's defenses.

Senior Suter is a Big Safari-managed special access program. Big Safari itself is a shadowy Air Force unit that has developed small numbers of specialized reconnaissance systems, including drones, in what are often classified programs. The Suter technology was developed during the last several years by BAE Systems and involves invading enemy communications networks and computer systems, particularly those associated with integrated air defense systems (AW&ST Aug. 16, 2004, p. 24; Nov. 4, 2002, p. 30). Suter 1 allowed U.S. operators to monitor what enemy radars could see. The capability enables U.S. forces to assess the effectiveness of their stealth systems or terrain-masking tactics. Suter 2 permits U.S. operators to take control of enemy networks as system managers and actually manipulate the sensors, steering them away from penetrating U.S. aircraft. Suter 3 was tested last summer to add the ability to invade the links to time-critical targets, such as battlefield ballistic missile launchers or mobile surface-to-air missile launchers. Aircraft involved in the Suter programs include the EC-130 Compass Call, RC-135 Rivet Joint and F-16CJ strike aircraft specialized for suppression of enemy air defenses.

Information operations and computer network attack programs are now considered the military's most closely guarded projects, surpassing even new stealth advances.

(Excerpt) Read more at aviationnow.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: black; blackops; covert; ecm; secret; sigint
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Dark Wing; Dog Gone; Shermy; blam

ping


41 posted on 01/24/2007 8:21:23 PM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
Either this has been vetted and got the Pentagons ok,

Eh, an intelligent person can often piece together assorted open-source information on classified stuff and come up with a reasonably good picture of it without having had a leak or Pentagon approval.

42 posted on 01/24/2007 8:33:35 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Thud

Thanks for the ping. Very interesting article.


43 posted on 01/24/2007 8:34:27 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
The Suter aircraft evidently project multiple digital signal beams into the antennas and other electronic components of the enemy platform to probe and then set up an ad-hoc network, similar to what a "hacker" would do to a target computer on the Internet using ordinary TCP and IP data packets. The nature of the signal beams, however, is a highly guarded secret,
Smoke ... but no mirrors yet ...
44 posted on 01/24/2007 8:36:53 PM PST by _Jim (Highly recommended book on the Kennedy assassination - Posner: "Case Closed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

I agree with your comment.


45 posted on 01/24/2007 8:38:55 PM PST by TommyDale (If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
they were also talking about projecting contrived images, IIRC, presumably onto radar screens or the modern equivalent.
The creation of 'false (RADAR) returns' is an already well-known 'trick' ...
46 posted on 01/24/2007 8:39:18 PM PST by _Jim (Highly recommended book on the Kennedy assassination - Posner: "Case Closed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
Yes, I am aware of it. It's the Ultimate in EW.

It would be terrible, for example, if the N. Koreans tested a ballistic missile and it somehow went off course and hit Peking. Or of the Iranians did likewise and it somehow hit Damascus.

47 posted on 01/24/2007 8:40:27 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: _Jim

I think it builds upon that earlier "positional disparity" to create an entirely new virtual view, with fake aircraft, others missing, etc. I am making an educated guess here.


48 posted on 01/24/2007 8:42:53 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: nnn0jeh

ping


49 posted on 01/24/2007 8:43:19 PM PST by kalee (No burka for me....EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
>>>....projecting contrived images, IIRC, presumably onto radar screens or the modern equivalent.<<<

I have VietNam era F-4 (Navy Phantom) pilot friend that tells of flying in the same space with an EA-6B (or maybe it was an E-2 Hawkeye?) and they were joking about cababilities.

The 6B jock asked my friend his call sign....and immediately his radar screen went blank as his callsign was spelled out on its face.

50 posted on 01/24/2007 8:45:31 PM PST by HardStarboard (The Democrats are more afraid of American Victory than Defeat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BearWash

For instance, first, raise the noise 'floor' to hide your own hopefully LO (Low Observable 'platform'), second, delay, advance and reposition in time and even space 'stronger' timed and synchronized with the original RADAR pulse returns back to the emitter ... this works well with pulse trains that aren't randomized, in which case it becomes a LOT more difficult ... although broadband WN can still be used to 'blind' an OPFOR RADAR receiver ...


51 posted on 01/24/2007 8:49:58 PM PST by _Jim (Highly recommended book on the Kennedy assassination - Posner: "Case Closed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

I'm continually pissed that our military and intelligence secrets get outed to the media just to make some bureaucratic pukes can feel important.


52 posted on 01/24/2007 9:20:26 PM PST by bpjam (Never Give Up, Never Surrender (Unless James Baker gives you permission))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
Could they not just fly over and maim communication in Iran for a decade or two.
53 posted on 01/24/2007 9:26:56 PM PST by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC
Who's doing the "guarding"?

If elected Hillary Roddon Clinton will insure the safety of our technology.sarc/

54 posted on 01/24/2007 9:30:12 PM PST by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times; GreyFriar; SeraphimApprentice

Super-stuff ping.


55 posted on 01/24/2007 9:34:02 PM PST by zot (GWB -- the most slandered man of this decade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx; ASA Vet

Capabilities published are capabilities lost. There are two bugs that need fixing now.


56 posted on 01/24/2007 9:35:12 PM PST by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

Uh-huh.


57 posted on 01/24/2007 9:36:52 PM PST by HiJinx (Ask me about support for the Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

"Who's doing the "guarding"? That would be A1C Sandy Burglar."

Since we're in a "discovery" mode here, where is he filing the data - right sock or left sock?

Under these circumstances Berger needs to moved to a more secure location. I recommend Fort Leavenworth, KS for about 15 to 20 years.


58 posted on 01/24/2007 9:42:48 PM PST by incredulous joe ("Quo me amat, amat et canem meam" - Saint Bernard of Clairvaux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
It's deafening!
59 posted on 01/24/2007 9:55:34 PM PST by null and void (<----- Shocked and odd...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
It would be terrible, for example, if the N. Koreans tested a ballistic missile and it somehow went off course and hit Peking. Or of the Iranians did likewise and it somehow hit Damascus.

Damascus? That would be Syria's...

60 posted on 01/24/2007 9:57:07 PM PST by null and void (<----- Shocked and odd...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson