HILLARY'S WAR DOUBLE TALK: 'John Kerry could not have said it worse himself.' (swift-vet audio)

hillary clinton, swiftvets.com, john kerry, The New York Times | 2.2.07 | Mia T

[Mia T]

HILLARY'S WAR DOUBLE TALK
'John Kerry could not have said it worse himself.' (swift-vet audio)
MISSUS CLINTON'S SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE PROBLEM - PART THREE


by Mia T, 2.2.07

Patently synthetic play-acting and carefully manicured sound bites like Mrs. Clinton's look out of touch. (Mr. Obama's bare-bones Webcast and Web site shrewdly play Google to Mrs. Clinton's AOL.) Besides, the belief that an image can be tightly controlled in the viral media era is pure fantasy. Just ask the former Virginia senator, Mr. Allen, whose past prowess as a disciplined, image-conscious politician proved worthless once the Webb campaign posted on YouTube a grainy but authentic video capturing him in an embarrassing off-script public moment.

The image that Mrs. Clinton wants to sell is summed up by her frequent invocation of the word middle, as in "I grew up in a middle-class family in the middle of America." She's not left or right, you see, but exactly in the center where everyone feels safe....

This how she explains her vote to authorize the war: "I would never have expected any president, if we knew then what we know now, to come to ask for a vote. There would not have been a vote, and I certainly would not have voted for it." John Kerry could not have said it worse himself. No wonder last weekend's "Saturday Night Live" gave us a "Hillary" who said, "Knowing what we know now, that you could vote against the war and still be elected president, I would never have pretended to support it."

Compounding this problem for Mrs. Clinton is that the theatrics of her fledgling campaign are already echoing the content: they are so overscripted and focus-group bland that they underline rather than combat the perennial criticism that she is a cautious triangulator too willing to trim convictions for political gain. Last week she conducted three online Web chats that she billed as opportunities for voters to see her "in an unfiltered way." Surely she was kidding. Everything was filtered, from the phony living-room set to the appearance of a "campaign blogger" who wasn't blogging to the softball questions and canned responses. Even the rare query touching on a nominally controversial topic, gay civil rights, avoided any mention of the word marriage, let alone Bill Clinton's enactment of the federal Defense of Marriage Act....

This, in other words, is a moment of crisis in our history and there will be no do-overs. Should Mrs. Clinton actually seek unfiltered exposure to voters, she will learn that they are anxiously waiting to see just who in Washington is brave enough to act.

Hillary Clinton's Mission Unaccomplished
By FRANK RICH
January 28, 2007
The New York Times

ohn Kerry could not have said it worse himself."

That wonderful turn of phrase by Frank Rich has the force to knock missus clinton off the stage finally, for good... (and for The Good).

There is a basic flaw in Rich's argument, however. Rich's criticism of clinton and her 'out-of-touch' campaign is constructive, as though clinton and her campaign are fixable.

Rich does not seem to understand that the clinton machine has no other option because its candidate is a dud.

With a Q score—a measure of celebrity likability among the hoi polloi—in the toilet, missus clinton can win elections only by running virtually unopposed... and then only with the help of protheses, props, poses, PR machines, scripted appearances, screened audiences, vetted questions, Secret Service barracades, secret police, softball settings and sycophantic hosts, fictionalizing, humanizing, digitizing and otherwise hiding the real hillary clinton.

And then we have the baggage....

Anyone else but a clinton would have been summarily laughed off the stage.

The American people must understand that to get this defective candidate elected, the clintons must pervert the electoral process, turn democracy on its head. That is to say, the best candidate must lose.

Hence the threats to the big donors.....

by Mia T
HILLARY CLINTON'S Q SCORE
Hollywood take note

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

HILLARY "Zelig" CLINTON:

WHEN A CONGENITAL LIAR'S RUTHLESS AMBITION EXCEEDS HER ABILITY

 

by Mia T, 12.20.06

 

 

illary clinton is the not-so Human Chameleon.

She is a paradoxical personification of nothingness.

She is a simplistic parody of Woody Allen's intricately layered Zelig.

The life of missus clinton is a mock documentary about a non-entity who takes on the characteristics of whatever strong--

or useful--personality she comes in contact with.

Missus clinton's life seems small, and there is a reason for it: There aren't any characters in it.

Missus clinton proves what Woody Allen merely hypothesizes: The erroneousness of the almost universally held postulate that everyone is someone.

A Scoundrel's Pythagorean Imperative

Mia T, 12.14.03

z = distance between flag lapel pin and chin

d = distance between midpoint of chin and jowl

y = distance between the midpoint of chin and top button

x = distance between top button and flag lapel pin

   

 

 

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[stm]

This woman is as great a threat to this country as islamofascism.

[Mia T]

I think she's a greater threat. Will be posting on this shortly....

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

CORRECTION--forgot to include her 'alinsky period':

 

From HILLARY "Zelig" CLINTON: WHEN A CONGENITAL LIAR'S RUTHLESS AMBITION EXCEEDS HER ABILITY:

This brilliant Alinsky-clinton observation by beyond the sea is the perfect segue to an analysis of Alinsky's influence on hillary clinton... which leads inexorably to hillary rodham's closely guarded Wellesley thesis. (Plan to do an extended piece on that shortly.)

In the Wellesley thesis, hillary discussed "how to change the American political culture." This discussion occurred in the context of a tribute to the leftist political organizer, her mentor, Saul Alinsky.

Does missus clinton reveal her own thoughts on the radicalization and even balkanization of the American political process? We can't yet say with certainty because the thesis has been sealed--closed to public scrutiny--from the moment missus clinton insinuated her radicalizing, balkanizing, liquidating self onto the national political stage.

If I had to guess, I would say she adopted Saul Alinsky's theories and practices without modification: hillary clinton exhibits no creativity, no vision of her own and tends to glom onto the latest fashion, whether it's Alinsky's Stalinist methods... or New Age occultism, recall her attraction to the teachings of

• Marianne Williamson, who some described as a "Jewish charismatic spiritualist"
• Ken Scott Nateshvar, yogi to the stars
• and the pièce de résistance, Jean Houston, the Director of the Foundation for Mind Research.

Houston was described by some as a "New Age" author who "studied psychic experiences and mystical connections to historical figures and other worlds." When the story of the Houston connection became public Houston became known as hillary clinton's "Eleanor Roosevelt Conduit."

Although she baked no cookies, didn't do illicit land or cattle deals and stood by no man, hillary clinton starred in the triple role of the Cook, the Thief and his Wife. Her lover was played at once vaporously and in workmanlike fashion by the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt, with Janet Reno, between her stints rendering intermittent injustice for the Husband, as the reliable stand-in. Sidney Blumenthal was the stand-in for the Cook and Craig Livingstone the stand-in for the Thief. The last-minute addition of Christopher Hitchens as the snitch was a stroke of absolute genius notwithstanding its cerebral accident, its predictable-if-perfect pitch (or its facile alliteration).

by Mia T, January 3, 2006
Alien Abductions, Flying Saucers
+ Other Weird Phenomena, c.1992-2000

There is a great emotional likeness there too. Thank you for putting the photos side by side.

On Alinsky (http://www.vcn.bc.ca/citizens-handbook/rules.html)

For Alinsky, organizing is the process of highlighting what is wrong and convincing people they can actually do something about it. The two are linked. If people feel they don't have the power to change a bad situation, they stop thinking about it.

According to Alinsky, the organizer -- especially a paid organizer from outside -- must first overcome suspicion and establish credibility. Next the organizer must begin the task of agitating: rubbing resentments, fanning hostilities, and searching out controversy. This is necessary to get people to participate. An organizer has to attack apathy and disturb the prevailing patterns of complacent community life where people have simply come to accept a bad situation. Alinsky would say, "The first step in community organization is community disorganization."--beyond the sea

[E.G.C.]

BTTT

[OKSooner]

Frank Rich, of all people... BTTT

[Mia T]

thanx :)

[Mia T]

rich, indeed ;)

[An Old Man]

In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled HILLARY'S WAR DOUBLE TALK: 'John Kerry could not have said it worse himself.' (swift-vet audio), stm wrote: This woman is as great a threat to this country as islamofascism.

Stm,

The danger from the "islamofascist" can be dealt with as we are now doing in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The danger presented by a "Socialist" who has openly declared that "We will take things away from you on behalf of the common good"; is far greater than that of the former. In the case of the former, they can easily be identified and dealt with.

Home grown Socialists such as Hillary Clinton are for now handicapped in that they cannot come right out and tell you all of the things they have planned for you if they are to get elected.

Socialist like Hillary Clinton hide behind the customs and mores of the society they infest and look for opportunity's to impose their will on the citizens. Queen Nancy is a perfect example of what you can expect if the Socialist Hillary Clinton is elected President.

You can defeat the attempt of the Socialist Hillary Clinton by simply exposing her for what she is. Someone who is out to see to it that anything you own or possess is confiscated by one method or another for redistribution to those she deems more deserving than you. In most cases the deserving will be a small group of indivduals closely associated with her. That's the way this socialist thing works

Semper Fi
An Old Man

[RightWhale]

Hillary! was as upset as anyone after WTC911, but unlike most she was upset that the Republican Admin would be grabbing headlines for a long time.

[Mia T]

excellent.

Let us not forget that missus clinton is also a Stalinist. Will be addressing that soon....

[CBart95]

Everyone will want to hear the soundbites of Old Hil at the Demoscats Winter Meetings and being aired by her stable boy, Rush Limbaugh today.

She's added a harsh gravelly Bella Abzug snarl to her speechyfing that is wonderfully Bull Dykey...a perfect and fitting repugnancy for such an attractive advocate of HATE.

[RightWhale]

Her recent Conversations were 99% her irrelevancies and 1% reformulated blended questions from her worshipful base. She is so far from relevancy that she might as well broadcast from the far side of the moon.

[SMARTY]

Evita does not have a gram of conviction or commitment in her. She is politically, just as opportunistic and shamelessly self-promoting and arrogant as her 'husband'. Her 'performance' is so maladroit and patently self-conscious that only a regular numb skull would accept it

[Mia T]

Can you say 'megalomaniac'????

[YaYa123]

"I think she's a greater threat"

Me too!! Hillary's handlers, in concert with her MSM idiot savants, will do for Hillary what they continue to do for Bill: Turn character flaws, personal vices, gaffes and goofs, into virtues. You know the drill, it's already started. Saturday Night Live skits and late night comics will morf her into the same kind of loveable liar that Bill has become, and she'll be praised for being so skilled a self-serving scoundrel.

[AKA Elena]

Through my tears for the loss of MrConfettiMan, I thank you for yet another great presentation of fact about the Dark Side.

Young Joe (MCM), surely put on his armor for us as you use your special talents to create the announcement of so many interesting truths.

Thanks and special thanks for keeping me in your loop.

[MHGinTN]

Forgive me, but every time I read the following, I have a response I do not offer ... I'm gonna respond this time:

"Missus clinton's life seems small, and there is a reason for it: There aren't any characters in it." Actually, Mia, there is no character in Hillary Rodham; she had too many characters around her as she merely slithered along amongst them, acting as willing and even eager enabler for these characters in their degeneracy.

What Hillary Rodhamster's handlers must do in order to get her elected is create the image of character upon a screen where there is no character, no strength of character or worthiness. Hillary was in fact a victim of degenerate bill's malignant character. With such a person who was not only a victim but a willing enabler for the continuance of her victimhood America should not be victimized, because this woman will make US visits not only of her missing strength of character but victims of our dangerous enemies.

Make no mistake, missus clinton is void of character, but surrounded by characters pleading with US to imagine that she has character as our vision is blurred by the constant parade of dissonant characters and media propagandists. The woman is an empty victim. We must not allow her handlers to make US victims with her or because of her vacuousness, further victims of unopposed terrorists and hillary's dream of socialist utopia for America.

[Mia T]

I see your point. Even thought the SNL skit is devastating for hillary (see below), the logic could easily get lost in the political burlesque, especially among the uniformed.

SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE SYNDROME

 

If the Saturday Night Live clip and missus clinton's "I'm in!" video taken together make plain the absurdity of a hillary clinton commander-in-chief, ⁴ the Iowa misstep reinforces it.

Watching the Saturday Night Live clip and missus clinton's "I'm in!" video in succession confirms the obvious: The pundits and pols are asking the wrong hillary! question.

The fundamental question concerning missus clinton's candidacy isn't "Can she win?"... or "Will she win?"... or even "Should she win?"

No. The fundamental question is this: "Can missus clinton be taken seriously? Is missus clinton's candidacy more than simply a bad joke? Is missus clinton's candidacy legitimate? "

By asking the other questions, legitimacy is the presumption, the unasked question, the "When did you stop beating your wife?" sort of fallacy.

But the Saturday Night Live clip and missus clinton's "I'm in!" clip taken together belie that presumption.

The reason the Saturday Night Live sequence is so devastating is because it is not the usual SNL farce based on fact.

Rather, it is fact based on farce.

And missus clinton's "I'm in!" video confirms it.

Let down the curtain: the farce is done. (Rabelais)

Somebody stick the fork in that baby, already. Please.

ADDENDUM:

This exchange on Hardball underscores the farcical condition of the hillary clinton candidacy. Pay special attention to Howard Fineman.

[Twinkie]

Clinton has hit upon the perfect way to have it both ways by keeping her finger in the wind of public opinion polls. Whatever is the opinion of the day, she is for that. Changeable as the wind, but never really changes. A cold, hard woman who intends to be Queen of the World, and pity anyone who gets in her way. I don't know why anyone cares a fig what she SAYS she is going to do about any issue. When one can lie with abandon, then what she REALLY thinks is what she will REALLY do IF she gets the power. . which she must not.

[Mia T]

We actually agree. What I was referring to was precisely her vacuousness. Like the way you moved from 'no characters' to 'no character.'

Where we disagree: That she hooked up with bill clinton in the first place belies your statement that she is bill's victim. hillary knew exactly what she was doing when she hooked up with bill.

[Mia T]

BTW, her 'Viking' reference (when she saw bc for the first time, he reminded her of a Viking) was likely a inside joke (or else she is even more stupid than she appears). (Vikings were rapists.) She was giving her detractors the figurative finger.

[MHGinTN]

Mia, we have been told repeatedly that she was the victim in her marriage. Regardless of how she latched onto the degnerate one, she remained attached to this bulbous-nosed sex addict, making her a victim of his continuous filandering. I've never bought the worship of Jackie Kennedy since she knew all along that Jack was a sex addict 'doing' anything with a skirt, so she too played enabler while he remained alive. HOWEVER, hillary played publicly the victim while privately commanding the enabler role ... and if anyone doubts that, note her directing of the bimbo eruption platoon and her 'handling' of Juanita during her husbands campaign. A woman who will play such a twisted/mentally unhealthy dual role will put this nation in a similar position of being victim while enabling the march of terrorism.

[Mia T]

You are right. hillary clinton plays the victim. For votes. Ask Susan Estrich.
hillary clinton is no 'victim,' and she is no simple 'enabler.'
Missus clinton was complicit in the clinton rapes and predations.

HILLARY CLINTON THREATENED JUANITA BROADDRICK 2 WEEKS AFTER BILL CLINTON RAPED HER (VIDEO)


HILLARY CLINTON KNEW ABOUT THE RAPE: HEAR JUANITA BROADDRICK


SUSAN ESTRICH ON "DREDGING UP" THE RAPE OF JUANITA BROADDRICK + "ALL THAT OLD CLINTON STUFF"


t he clinton-clinton-Broaddrick kind of rape, according to Susan Estrich

ESTRICH IMPEACHED BY HER OWN WORDS,
EXPOSES STOCK HILLARY PLOY: EXPLOIT WOMEN
my amazon.com review


HEAR SUSAN ESTRICH: hillary plays 'the victim' for votes


STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: ED KLEIN AND SUSAN ESTRICH AGREE ABOUT HILLARY


WHY HILLARY MUST NOT WIN. WHY HILLARY CANNOT WIN.
(ICKES + ESTRICH PROVIDE ROADMAP--oops!--FOR HILLARY DEFEAT)


CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)


KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE



CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN


HILLARY! RAMPS UP CLINTON SECRET POLICE: THREAT INTENDED TO SILENCE OPPONENTS


hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"
("I am not a crook")


HILLARY ON THE COUCH
IS MISSUS CLINTON MENTALLY FIT?


HILLARY CLINTON'S Q SCORE
Hollywood take note


THE PUNDITS AND POLS ARE ASKING THE WRONG HILLARY! QUESTION...


THE 'ABNER MIKVA' FACTOR: Why missus clinton will not get the nomination


Were all the pundits wrong about Hillary's strength?


HANGING HILLARY: ClintoNNpolls fraud
HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR ₆


DENNIS MILLER TAKES ON HILLARY CLINTON:'I'M PRETTY SURE YOU'RE NOT SMART ENOUGH TO BE MY PRESIDENT.'


HILLARY 'the smartest woman in the world' CLINTON USED GYP SHEETS IN DEBATE WITH SPENCER AND BOMBED ANYWAY


1st Feminist Prez Impeached
(clinton, pushed by the "smartest woman in the world," managed to impeach himself)


HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue


HILLARY!?? WHAT IS THIS MORIBUND LOSER DOING IN THE POLITICAL ARENA, ANYWAY? (bill's bud explains)

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

[MHGinTN]

We've got a team match going, Mia! Hope folks are getting something constructive out of your considerable efforts.

[RightWhale]

Yeah, and garden variety demagogue.

[Mia T]

bump

[Mia T]

:)

[jla]

I think she's a greater threat. Will be posting on this shortly....

~reaching down and unplugging Mia's Mac~

jla: He means well.

[Twinkie]

Rush played a soundbite from Hillary today where she was commenting on the record-breaking profits of Exxon. She remarked in a very loud, shrill and imperical tone that she is going to take those profits away and work wonders with them. Can someone tell me just how this Wannabe Dictator plans on TAKING profits from anyone? Perhaps someone should suggest that her obscenely and miraculously high cattle futures' profits should be where she begins her philanthropical government giveaway largesse.

[Mia T]

not THAT shortly ;)

[Mia T]

impervious mac plug ;)

[PGalt]

Analytical. Informative. Great thread.

[Miss Didi]

The AP photo that matched the speech was SO scary; I could not believe it was real.

Hillary Chavez

My gosh, Mia, the Pantsuit is providing you with so much material, you may have to quit your day job. Thank you for all you do.

[Wolverine]

bump

[Mia T]

thank you, PGalt :)

[Mia T]

bump

hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"
("I am not a crook")

[debbieargel]

I will be on the Cavuto Show on Monday to address Hillary's bipolar problems.

Thanks for posting,
Debbie Argel Bastian
Proud mother of Capt. Derek Argel, USAF Special Ops, KIA Memorial Day, 2005 Diyala, Iraq

[jla]

bump

[Mia T]

Rush played a soundbite from Hillary today where she was commenting on the record-breaking profits of Exxon. She remarked in a very loud, shrill and imperical tone that she is going to take those profits away and work wonders with them. Can someone tell me just how this Wannabe Dictator plans on TAKING profits from anyone? Perhaps someone should suggest that her obscenely and miraculously high cattle futures' profits should be where she begins her philanthropical government giveaway largess --Twinkie

I will be on the Cavuto Show on Monday to address Hillary's bipolar problems.

Thanks for posting,

Debbie Argel Bastian
Proud mother of Capt. Derek Argel,
USAF Special Ops, KIA Memorial Day, 2005 Diyala, Iraq--debbieargel

HILLARY ON THE COUCH
IS MISSUS CLINTON MENTALLY FIT?

by Mia T, 01.05.07

 

"The power of the harasser, the abuser, the rapist depends above all on the silence of women." (Ursula K. LeGuin)

utting hillary on the couch seems to be the preoccupation of every armchair shrink extant and no wonder. The clinton psyche is awash with profound and intractable dysfunction.

But it is precisely this teeming derangement that renders such efforts futile; that is to say, the very pervasiveness of clinton dysfunction is what precludes ever making a differential diagnosis in the first place.

No matter. To precisely categorize clinton dysfunction is almost beside the point. Anyone still sentient after 14-to-15 years of clinton exposure already knows the clintons are mentally unfit; and this is all we really need to know as they position themselves for their final assault.

We come to bury the clintons, not to cure them.

Which brings us to the rape of Juanita Broaddrick.¹

Mentally fit people do not rape. And either the clintons raped Juanita Broaddrick or they did not.²

And with all due respect to Susan Estrich, the statute of limitations here is irrelevant.³ This is not about taking away the clintons' liberty. This is about taking away their license.


"When liberty becomes license, dictatorship is near." (Will Durant)

MORE

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

---

No doubt, missus clinton is a psychopath. (Note the distinction vs. sociopath)

In a nutshell and generally speaking, the clintons are obviously both:

1. psychopathic (exhibit myriad personality disorders associated with violence, lack of empathy and socially manipulative behavior)
   
   
2. psychotic (hold grandiose and paranoid delusions) Although psychosis is considered by mainstream psychiatry to be a symptom of severe mental illness, it should be distinguished from the concept of insanity, which is a legal term denoting that a person should not be criminally responsible for his actions.
   

The clintons are--and must be held--criminally responsible for all their betrayals, misdeeds and outrages.

Our problem is getting a government with the courage, character and selflessness to nail them.

We must purge DC of the professional pols; we must field citizen politicians of exceptional achievement and character; we must produce an electorate that is informed, an electoral system that is free of fraud. No easy task. But doable.

As a starter, we can make certain that these two miscreants never again take the White House.

 

---

The difference between a psychopath and a sociopath is somewhat blurred, at least according to the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). DSM-IV lists both definitions together under the heading of Antisocial Personalities because they share some common traits. However, some professionals maintain there is a difference beyond the similarities.

Shared traits of the psychopath and sociopath include a complete disregard for the feelings and rights of others. This usually surfaces by age 15 and may be accompanied by cruelty to animals. These traits are distinct and repetitive, creating a pattern of misbehavior that goes beyond normal adolescent mischief.

Both the psychopath and sociopath fail to feel remorse or guilt. They appear to lack a conscience and are completely self-serving. They routinely disregard rules, social mores and laws, unmindful of putting themselves or others at risk.

Of the more distinguishing traits, some argue the sociopath to be less organized in his or her demeanor, nervous and easily agitated &endash; someone likely living on the fringes of society, without solid or consistent economic support. A sociopath is more likely to spontaneously act out in inappropriate ways without thinking through the consequences.

Conversely, the psychopath tends to be extremely organized, secretive and manipulative. The outer personality is often charismatic and charming, hiding the real person beneath. Though psychopaths do not feel for others, they can mimic behaviors that make them appear normal. Upon meeting, one would have more of a tendency to trust a psychopath than a sociopath.

Because of the organized personality of the psychopath, he or she might have a tendency to be better educated than the average sociopath, who probably lacks the attentive skills to excel in school. While psychopaths can fly under the radar of society, many maintaining families and steady work, a sociopath more often lacks the skills and drive for mimicking normal behavior, making "seemingly healthy" relationships and a stable home less likely. From a criminal standpoint, a sociopath's crimes are typically disorganized and spontaneous, while the psychopath's crimes are well planned out. For this reason, psychopaths are harder to catch than sociopaths, as the sociopath is more apt to leave ample evidence in his or her explosions of violence.

Hence, while similar psychological traits might fall under the antisocial personality heading, from a social and criminalist point of view, the differences between a psychopath and a sociopath may be significant.--What is the Difference Between a Psychopath and a Sociopath?

 

[Mia T]

 

"She is angry. Not all the time. But most of the time."

author Gail Sheehy
Hillary's Choice
(New York: Random House, 1999) p. 11

 

 

"[Hillary Clinton] is in a perpetual state of suspended anger...."

former Clinton adviser
to author Gail Sheehy
Hillary's Choice
(New York: Random House, 1999) p. 139

 

 

"Hillary hit him between the eyes. She was angrier than Paul had ever seen her. 'You f**king Jew bastard!' she screamed."

author Jerry Oppenheimer
quoting campaign aide Paul Fray
State of a Union
(New York: Harper-Collins, 2000) p. 153

 

 

[W]hen White House Counsel... Abner Mikva finally bowed to the law and delivered subpoenaed documents, she and her White House scandal team lashed at him with such a vicious streak of humiliating profanity that he resigned.

Barbara Olson
Hell to Pay
(Washington, D.C.: Regnery, 1999) p. 5

 

 

"Anyone that stood up... was smashed down and belittled,very personally. [N]ot only would she sort of humiliate you in front of your colleagues or whoever happened to be around, Hillary tended to kind of campaign against people behind their back, and that was certainly my experience."

former Clinton press secretary Dee Dee Myers
PBS Frontline, 16 Jan 2001
The Clinton Years

 

 

 

Longtime Hillary aide Carolyn Huber, who saved Mrs. Clinton's buns in 1996 with a convenient cover story about how her mysterious Rose Law Firm billing records magically appeared in the White House book room, described the former first lady's fits of rage to Sheehy as nearly lethal. "The person on the receiving end never gets over it," Huber remembered, reportedly shivering as she spoke those words.

Hillary's Scheme
(New York: Crown Forum, 2003) p. 88
Hillary's Choice
(New York: Random House, 1999) p. 11

 

 

The rages continued even after Mrs. Clinton took up residence in the White House, where she blew up at a Secret Service agent for declining to carry her bags. When the agent explained that he needed to keep his hands free in order to protect her, she replied, "If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass over here and grab those bags."

Joyce Milton
First Partner
(New York: William Morrow, 1999) p. 259