Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Research: God did speak world into existence
WorldNetDaily ^ | February 11, 2007 9:35 p.m. Eastern

Posted on 02/11/2007 9:14:11 PM PST by Tim Long

Research: God did speak world into existence Student's scientific documentation offers evidence of biblical account

A science student in Kentucky says when the Bible records God spoke, and things were created, that's just what happened, and he can support that with scientific experiments.

"If God spoke everything into existence as the Genesis record proposes, then we should be able to scientifically prove that the construction of everything in the universe begins with a) the Holy Spirit (magnetic field); b) Light (an electric field); and c) that Light can be created by a sonic influence or sound," Samuel J. Hunt writes on his website.

(Story continues below)

"There are several documented and currently taught laboratory experiments that accurately portray the events in Genesis in sequential order, the most important being that of sonoluminescence," he wrote.

That, he described to WND, is the circumstance in which sending a sonic signal into bubbles in a fluid causes the bubbles to collapse and they release photons, or create light.

That aligns with one of the earlier descriptions of the creation by God, when, in Genesis 1:1-3, the Holy Spirit moved upon the face of the deep, which generally is considered water, and said "Let there be light," he explained.

God was sending a sonic influence into the waters, and basically creating light, Hunt said. He's documented his theory, and the experiments he believes back it up, in his "Episteme Scientia, the Law of All That Is."

Researchers at institutions no less than UCLA and the University of Chicago have verified the production of light from bubbles when sound is passed through a liquid, called sonoluminescence.

Hunt said he was spurred on in his work because the advanced physics and other courses he was taking were advancing propositions that sometimes didn't match up.

"The further I went, the more my questions seemed to be being answered in the Genesis record," he told WND.

His abstract states, "An examination of the sequential mathematical and experimental dual proof of the Genesis record of origins underlying the institution of all that is in the universe – from waves to matter to the mind."

Hunt said science has been proving the Genesis account in classrooms for centuries, "in spite of the fervency to promote evolution and big bang theories."

A student at Western Kentucky University in Bowling Green, Hunt said his questions started very simply.

"I asked my professors in physics and chemistry, 'What if I could scientifically prove that all matter was spoken into existence and that all matter could be manipulated by sound just as Genesis says? Wouldn't that mean God exists and created the universe?" he asked.

"Nobody's every done that before," was the response.

His 84-page treatise, now published, addresses that, he said.

Hunt said he believes every event in Genesis can be observed to be happening daily.

"Either you experience a universe of chaos or a universe of order and processes that produce immediate and calculable results," he wrote. "The results of my research support and prove that everything that exists was spoken into existence from waves to matter to mind."

"My professors think my application of accepted laws and theories may bend the rules a bit, but the ideas are thought-provoking and progressive," he said.

The website describes the integration of several mathematical systems including "Phi, Pi, L-systems, Penrose tiling, and an all-encompassing Koch curve."

The outline, available at scienceprovescreation.com, already has sold more than 1,700 copies.

Hunt said his goal was to be able to provide experiments that would explain the Genesis creation story – in the order the Bible records events happened.

"Some of my teachers are like, 'That's complete hogwash,'" he said, "while others say, 'That's pretty interesting.'"

His goal is to bring a unity to the Christian community, "just like the founders of our nation expected and wanted from the Constitution."

The documentation of his processes, Hunt believes, could end debate.

"People want to know the truth, to have something to stand on that's not trickery and deceit," he said. "This gives people something real to touch, hang on to."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: darwinismsnotscience; thelightbulbdidit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: Tim Long

Uh, to whom was he speaking?


81 posted on 02/12/2007 2:57:45 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
I'm a person of faith and this is one of the stupidest statement I have ever read. WND has jumped the shark.

Consider it a parable. ;)

82 posted on 02/12/2007 3:01:05 PM PST by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Frapster

Three more years. =D

Too bad you can't change handles or even create new ones.


83 posted on 02/12/2007 3:51:56 PM PST by TeenagedConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: LtKerst

"Where did the water come from?
why is this a question as if it shows God cant exist?

Evolutionists cant explain it, yet say that Evolution is a forgone conclusion, and nothing else can be taught in schools...?

If the Evolutionists cant explain where the water came from ...why can they teach Evolution as Fact? yet God is
disproved by it???

God's Voice would be Super-Sonic!!!!! across Space all at once creating Light from the Waters in the Sky!!!!
WOW!!!! what a concept!!! energy and matter all in an instant!!!!
If His Voice can "Speak" into existance Light and Matter ( which is what Water is...)
then you have your "Begining"

the problem is that You then have to Face your Sin and Eternity... Now you really have a Problem.

Now you have to get an "evolution" explanation for Hell.

So you can go on running from Judgement.

But there is good news for the Repentant Man.

Jesus is the Savior of the World."

THANK-YOU PHILETUS. HERE IS THE ORDER 1) VOID 2) FILLED WITH ENERGY--ZPE --HOLY SPIRIT 3) VOICE -- ENERGY THROUGH COMPRESSION AND RAREFACTION OF ZPE PE MAGNETIC FIELD CREATES KE ENERGY OF MOTION --AND THE COMMAND LIGHT.

WATER = PLASMA = CELL = CONSTITUENT OF A BODY
WATER = PLASMA = IONIZED GAS FIELD = ETHERIC

THE TEXT FOR MOVED ACTUALLY MEANS BROODING
BROODING = OVERSHADOWING = BLANKETING = STILL = PE

SOUND = ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE/WAVE BY THE COMPRESSION + RAREFACTION OF STILL, BROODING IN THE PREVIOUS VOID, HOLY SPIRIT THIS WILL YIELD THE PROCESS OF SONOLUMINESCENCE. THE SOLUTION EFFERVESCES, THE BUBBLES EXPAND THEN AS THEY CONTRACT RELEASE PHOTONS, HENCE LIGHT.

THIS ACTION OF AN ELECTROMOTIVE WAVE COMBINING WITH A MAGNETIC FIELD YIELDS THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM FROM WHICH EVERYTHING ELSE THAT EXISTS IS MADE OF --EVERYTHING IS Hz, OR, SOUND + LIGHT AND WHEN YOU COALESCE TO ANIMATE LIFE + INFORMATION (MIND).

THIS ALSO EXPLAINS THE DIVISION OF THE FIRST DAY. Day and Night, NOT dAY and nIGTH, BUT RATHER ALL THE DARK SPACE --DARK MATTER, IF YOU WILL--- WAS CREATED BY THE COLLAPSED BUBBLES, CALLED FARADAY DARK SPACE. THE LIGHT --THE EMBODIMENT OF THE INNUMERABLE PHOTONS CREATED, IS WHAT GOD USED TO CREATE EVERYTHING ELSE THAT EXISTS. HENCE THE DUAL NATURE OF LIGHT -- PARTICLE AND WAVE.

ALTHOUGH PHOTONS WERE GIVEN OFF --THE WHOLE OF THEM ALL AS ONE BECAME THE NEW WAVE BY WHICH EVERYTHING ELSE TO BE CREATED WOULD HARMONICALLY BE CONNECTED. HENCE RESONANCE AND VIBRATION. EVERYTHING VIBRATES.

LIKEWISE THIS EXPLAINS WHEN LUCIFER (WHO WAS THE BRIGHTNESS OF GOD'S GLORY) FELL FROM HEAVEN --HIS LIGHT COLLAPSED AND WAS SEPARATED FROM THE TRUE LIGHT-- THAT OF CHRIST (HE WHO IS ANOINTED WITH LIGHT). AND AS SOON AS THERE WAS A PLACE TO PUT HIM, WAS CAST INTO THE EARTH, IN HIS NEW BODY, JUST AS JESUS DID LATER ON.

WELL, LIKE I SAID, THANKS FOR THE COMMENTS I AM GLAD TO RAISE SUCH A RUCKUS AND ACTUALLY MAKE PEOPLE HAVE TO THINK. PEOPLE LIKE MR. LONG WILL ALWAYS BE IN DENIAL. SCIENCE NEITHER DESTROYS FAITH, NOR DOES IT DENY MIRACLES AND GOD. MIRACLES ARE MISUNDERSTOOD PROCESSES OF SCIENCE THAT GOD CREATED IN THE BEGINNING WHICH THOUSANDS OF YEARS LATER WE CANNOT YET ATTAIN TO COMPREHEND (MOSTLY BECAUSE WE HAVE DRUGGED OURSELVES TO BELIEVE WE CAN'T --CAN'T NEVER DID ANYTHING). BUT ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE TO HIM WHO BELIEVES.

BY THE WAY ELECTRICITY STILL REMAINS A MIRACLE.


84 posted on 02/12/2007 9:16:25 PM PST by parashift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: parashift
>>1."Where did the water come from?
why is this a question as if it shows God cant exist?

2.Evolutionists cant explain it, yet say that Evolution is a forgone conclusion, and nothing else can be taught in schools...?

3. If the Evolutionists cant explain where the water came from ...why can they teach Evolution as Fact? yet God is
disproved by it??? << Numbers added for clarity.

1. Water (on earth at least) is largely the product of volcanic outgassing (i.e. it came out of volcanoes) (footnote A)

2. Much of the water predated life on earth and thus it isn't primarily an evolution question but the early life forms added to the water content. (footnote B)

3. The theories related to evolution in no way disprove God. It was actually through the study of science and seeing the beauty, majesty and symmetry of the universe that I became open minded enough to be ready to believe when the time came and I had a personal experience with God. There is no conflict between exploring and learning about the universe and belief in God. Man, during the time the bible was written would not have been able to understand beyond the level of detail in the bible. We did not yet have concepts like "billions" or light years or atoms. (footnote C)
85 posted on 02/13/2007 6:13:05 AM PST by gondramB (It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: parashift
Footnote A. Other gasses produced by outgassing include carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), hydrochloric acid (HCl), methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3), nitrogen (N2) and various sulfur gasses sulfur gases. BTW, the CO and the CO2 were largely used up by the weathering of minerals. That likely why there is so much calcium carbonate (limestone, seashells, chalk marble etc.) and silica (sand, quartz and part of limestone). There is some debate about the water content- there is a competing model called the accretion theory but it is contradicted by the banded iron formations and sulfide minerals.

Footnote B. I'm only a physicist - you could probably get a better answer from someone with a biology related background. But basically there was no free oxygen - rocks older than about 2 billion years contain banded iron layers that would not have formed if there was very much oxygen available. Outgasses from volcanoes contain basically no free oxygen so the oxygen of the atmosphere is almost completely the product of the photosynthetic activity of green plants.

Footnote C. Some of the things that led me to be open minded were the way that the math for the flow of water and the math for electricity are so similar - the way that the number pi appears everywhere from the tiniest particles to circles to distant stars and the way that everywhere we look patterns are found among seeming chaos. I concluded that my vision of God was too small - that he is not limited by what he told Abraham and the other prophets. It makes me wonder what else there is that we are not yet ready to understand. It make me want to try harder to examine creation and better under. I suspect my vision of God is still too small - I just don't know in what way it is too small, much as Abraham couldn't forsee what we would later learn about chemistry and physics..
86 posted on 02/13/2007 6:15:17 AM PST by gondramB (It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: TeenagedConservative

ooo... you're not allowed to make new ones? I've never tried or thought about it before but I guess on a system this large it's not a bad policy.


87 posted on 02/13/2007 6:47:47 AM PST by Frapster (Don't mind me - I'm distracted by the pretty lights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

Well, that's why many Christians today assume the Bible is not meant to be taken literally. Because it doesn't make sense when you take it that way.


88 posted on 02/13/2007 6:43:19 PM PST by edweena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Thanks for the response gondram. I know of the theory that you speak, and before I ever conceived of writing Episteme Scentia --I thoroughly embarrassed (unintentionally) my professor in intro to biology a couple years ago --who also happens to teach evolution. All I did was ask questions. He still does not look at me when he passes through the halls. I gave him a book shortly after that, "Why 50 scientist believe in God" or something like that --he still has it I guess. Anywho..

So let's think about that theory very simply. #1) where did the H2O come from? They say that is out gassed from molten rocks. That enough pressure will squeeze water from a rock. Well, imagine another professors surprise when I said well, that makes the bible scientific then. Because God told Moses to SPEAK to the rock to get water out of it --but Moses disobeyed and struck it with Aaron's rod. No matter, water poured forth --and my professor walked away very angry. So, yeah, there is water contained in rock. But does that mean that lava likewise contains water? Well, let's say that since molten rock (lava) is trapped deep within the earth, the steam pressure has nowhere to go until it is released during an explosion of the surface.

sidetrack: water (vapor) is diamagnetic -- slightly repelled. And it would be in it's gaseous state upon expulsion from the earth. Yet, without an ozone layer having been evolved yet around the earth --there would have been nothing to hold the vapor in. Not just H2O gas, but any gas for that matter. Ozone is created by the belching out of volcanoes. But what would have stopped O3 from just flowing out into space? You need a balloon to hold the gases in. A FIRMAMENT. And beyond that what caused the first volcano to explode? Check this link:

http://volcano.und.edu/vwdocs/planet_volcano/mars/Shields/Overview.html

So, if being active for billions of years didn't do it for mars --no gas collection, no vapor collection --hence no condensation; why should we think it was going to work for earth? I could go through every planet this way --even the ones with magnetospheres. Yet, we do not see any vegetation popping up on the dry planets. On the water planets --we do not see volcanoes erupting creating land mass and creating atmospheres. How many billions of years do they have to be able to accomplish this?

Anywho--so where did the first plant come from? After billions of years under volcanic ash did it just spontaneously combust by pressure and temperature forcing its chemical components to bond to create a seed? But wait, there's no water --because there's no O2 to bind with H2 because there are no plants to convert CO2, H2O, and light to O2 and glucose --because there is no H2O in the soil --because there is no O3 to create a canopy to hold in the toxic gases created by volcanic eruptions yet--because the theory says that the volcanoes created the gas spheres around the earth in their perfect concentrations. But without an already existent atmosphere --a balloon, if you will; because we know that gases spread out to fill the container (space) evenly --- NO GASES WOULD HAVE EVER BEEN TRAPPED AROUND THE EARTH ESPECIALLY H2O BECAUSE OF ITS DIAMAGNETIC PROPERTIES (repelled in the presence of a magnet --the earth being a pretty big one). No trapped gases = no water. No water = no plants. No plants = no O2 and glucose. No O2 and glucose = no life as we see today.

So, If none of this occurred, then obviously evolution could not have ever begun. If any of this fantastical imaginary reality did come true--it would have already happened elsewhere-- not only in our solar system but on any of the other spiral galaxies that contain sun's like ours and rocky planets just like our solar system has. But, alas, it never has in all those billions upon billions of years --woe is evolution. (By the way there are 2 billion stars like our sun in the universe -- all of them older than ours --so there has been plenty of opportunity)

SO what is the alternative? The correct order for processes to occur would have to be: 1) There would have to be a container that the gases would fill evenly in order to be trapped. 2)There would already have to be huge land masses and there would have to be already existent water to begin the hydrological cycle of evaporation and precipitation --- in order to get any spontaneously combusted seed in the middle of a land mass H20.

sidetrack: there is enough water on the planet to completely cover all land mass to a depth of 2 miles. Can you imagine the time it would take for underwater volcanic eruptions to reach the surface, and create continents? Then the amount of time it would take to spontaneously evolve a single seed that would make it to the surface of that land mass? But, without the hydrological cycle already in existence it would die. Which is why water must come first, then land --but evolution cannot account for the amount of time necessary by volcanic explanations.

3) There would already have to be seeds existent in the soil. Obviously seeds don't spontaneously combust. And, since they don't you need a mature plant in order to reproduce a seed.

Well, the only alternative explanation that describes these events in this order is genesis. And this is described in detail in my proof. It is inevitable: For anything to be living in the universe---water came first --there is no other way, there is no explaining your way out of it. You simply must have an electrolytic solution first. It is the only way.

Now. Where did H20 come from? What is its constituent parts? H and O. What are the constituent parts of H and O? Spectrum analysis will tell you: Light. What is the constituent elements of Light? Electricity and Magnetism. What are their constituent parts? Energy. How did they come together? By compression. What was the force? An initial longitudinal wave, The spoken Word.

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It is eternal. The first water? Plasma --an ionized gas field --energy --a life force. The only life force that is all powerful and eternal? God the Father. And God said? Light. See John chapter 1.

Science proves creation. Creation is proof of God's existence. The foundation of everything that exists is sound and light.




89 posted on 02/14/2007 4:48:43 PM PST by parashift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: parashift

90 posted on 02/15/2007 7:03:14 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: doc30
Getting pretty close to 140 on the The Crackpot Index
91 posted on 02/15/2007 2:32:54 PM PST by dread78645 (Evolution. A doomed theory since 1859.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: dread78645; doc30; et al

Men who make such comments as those above are neither grounded in reason, nor erudition; are pitifully void of knowledge and destitute of understanding. According to the psychosis of your communistic idealism related by you as a measuring stick of enlightenment in your 'crackpot index' --you shall only ever be able to walk the narrow planks of communism in your cafeteria lines of learning eating the same gruel day after day and simply rotating its ingredients by degrees on your plate never receiving anything besides what the masters force you to have. God forbid you should ever turn to the right or left on your ever constricting planks leading to your intellectual doom lest you fall off into the abyss of freedom. Yet you see your endless droning as some call to others who should be bound by the same shackles of depression and poverty creating a vacuous black hole wherein all those who are weak-minded and empty shall be attracted by the force of your gravity. I stand in defiance to the Hawking theory that there is nothing that can escape a black hole --- for this Light shines even so.

And God said...Let there be Light. And the Light shined in your darkness, but you comprehended it not. So God has divided the Light from the Darkness. But lest you think that I am falling prey to your trap of vain contention --let me approach your comments as the result of prediction through observation and as a result of well-defined experiments some at least 3500 years old.

Matt. 5:11 "Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you."

Jesus was a Scientist. This prediction is 2000 years old and ever since the statement was made has been coming true. The spin on all of history in our classrooms is that Christian have been the cause of every evil on mankind since the days of the enlightenment and this is the underlying reason why the communist manifesto was written --to help the world throw off the burden of their Christian Kings. This has caused another paradigm shift in understanding that God the creator of Life --would give someone pain, misery, and death as a result of their offending this oppressive ruler who doesn't let people be free to be who they want--homosexual, perverted, abusive, vile, foul-mouthed, sinner. When all the time the law of the universe is that dissonance automatically cancels itself out--it is the cause of its own distress by its own dissonance by the Law of action and result--God has no hand in bringing to pass any of those results.

Further, your comments show the true nature and emotions in your heart towards those who do not walk the planks as you do; you show your hatred. And by your hatred your words are used as weapons to try and murder anyone who doesn't care to wear similar chains of bondage.

John 15:18-25 "If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. If ye were of the world, the world would love his own; but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also. But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not him that sent me. If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not sin; but now they have no cloak for their sin. He that hateth me hateth my father also. But this cometh to pass, that the word might be fulfilled that is written in their law, They hated me without a cause."

Further your responses were predicted even a 1000 years before Christ in one of the largest scientific discoveries and experiments undertaken in all of History --and is described in the book of Ecclesiastes:

Eccl. 1:10,13,14. "Is there anything whereof it may be said, See, this is new? It already hath been of old time, which was before us. And I gave my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all things that are done under heaven: this sore travail hath God given to the sons of man to be exercised therewith. I have seen all the works that are done under the sun; and, behold, all is vanity and vexation of the spirit."

Even Solomon knew, 1000 years before Christ, using every resource one of the richest kings ever to live could put at his disposal, and still knew there was no such thing as evolution. There was nothing new then, just as there is nothing new now. In 3000 years there has never been any observed transitions of evolution, not one. As a matter of fact in what laboratory was evolution created as a validated issue of important scientific endeavor--that could be, and should be taught in schools? A courtroom, not a laboratory, in 1925 Scopes trial. In what laboratory has evolution been observed to occur as an ongoing scientific process? In a courtroom in Dover, Pa. There is no mathematical proof, there is no observed, nor reproducible, laboratory occurrence of random genes in a petri dish to combine to form a strand of DNA. Nor on a smaller scale has inert, non-living elements ever come together to form living matter.

Is. 51:7,8. "Hearken unto me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law; fear ye not the reproach of men, neither be ye afraid of their revilings. For the moth shall eat them up like a garment, and the worm shall eat them like wool: but my righteousness shall be forever, and my salvation from generation to generation."

You see? prediction based upon observation yields the expected result. This is the vortex to which everything is attracted. It has always been as these scriptures state, and it will always be as they predict. Your attitudes and comments, to something you haven't even examined or read yet, are merely expected results based on 3,000+ years of prediction and experimentation. This is probably one of the oldest scientific laws known to man:

John 3:19-21. "And this is the condemnation, that Light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For everyone that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."

Ultimately, this is why you haven't even read the document yet. You won't because it is a description of the Light. And by it, you will know where you truly stand. And that is a reality you are not prepared to face. You fear it. And that is why you try to discredit it. Your reactions are psych 101.

So what was the conclusion of Solomon's experiment?

Eccl. 12:13,14."Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil."


92 posted on 02/18/2007 6:40:54 AM PST by parashift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: parashift
And God said...Let there be Light.

HAVE YOU SEEEEN THE LIGHT?
YES! YES! JESUS H. TAP-DANCING CHRIST... I HAVE SEEN THE LIGHT!

Jesus was a Scientist.

I'm pretty sure he was a Pharisee --it's that 'not one jot or tittle will pass away' bit.

... by your hatred your words are used as weapons to try and murder anyone who doesn't care to wear similar chains of bondage.

Oh, so it's murder and bondage?

Wear it with pride:


93 posted on 02/18/2007 9:31:01 AM PST by dread78645 (Evolution. A doomed theory since 1859.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Well the guy's site is on the web and WorldNutDaily reported on it so it must be true ;)

As a Christian I find this 'theory' absolutely absurd.

I bet you won't see this in the MSM!! It's a coverup!! Why isn't Fox carrying it?!? < /'true conservative'>

94 posted on 02/18/2007 9:35:26 AM PST by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Good post, although 3 other eqns were left out to complete Maxwell's Eqns.


95 posted on 02/18/2007 9:39:16 AM PST by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: parashift
Jesus was a Scientist.

Are you sure? I'm pretty sure Jesus was in the building trades.

Further your responses were predicted even a 1000 years before Christ in one of the largest scientific discoveries and experiments undertaken in all of History --and is described in the book of Ecclesiastes: Eccl. 1:10,13,14. "Is there anything whereof it may be said, See, this is new? It already hath been of old time, which was before us. And I gave my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all things that are done under heaven: this sore travail hath God given to the sons of man to be exercised therewith. I have seen all the works that are done under the sun; and, behold, all is vanity and vexation of the spirit."

If all the works -- especially new works -- done under the sun are vanity and vexation, how come you're using a computer? Shouldn't you be herding goats in some far off pasture?

96 posted on 02/18/2007 9:48:05 AM PST by Alter Kaker (Hard headed brainwashed trained monkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

"Some of my teachers are like, 'That's complete hogwash,'" he said, "while others say, 'That's pretty interesting.'"


Uhh...I'll take "hogwash" for 500, Alec...


97 posted on 02/18/2007 9:50:07 AM PST by Kurt_Hectic (Trust only what you see, not what you hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
Good post, although 3 other eqns were left out to complete Maxwell's Eqns.

Maybe they didn't have room and put them on the back?

I confess, I once saw a T-shirt with the governing equations for the magnetic containment and the plasma for a fusion reactor...

Cheers!

98 posted on 02/18/2007 9:55:37 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

Have you ever seen Maxwell's original publication on this, a reprint of course? It is kind of odd, like reading Galileo's research papers. You have to be in a mood very different from the modern attitude.


99 posted on 02/18/2007 9:59:35 AM PST by RightWhale (300 miles north of Big Wild Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I think I read it once,..while studying Paris & Hurd, also original research into the founding papers regarding Leibnitz's Integral calculus. I've always found it interesting to go back and read cpmpetitive theories and methods used at the time these more popular mathematical methods were established. it helps to discern the implicit assumptions made and objects of the logic used in their original constraints.


100 posted on 02/18/2007 10:04:08 AM PST by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson