Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

None more black - Engineers make the most anti-reflective coating yet.
news@nature.com ^ | 1 March 2007 | Dave Mosher

Posted on 03/02/2007 11:59:22 PM PST by neverdem

news@nature.com - the best science journalism on the web Close window



Published online: 1 March 2007; | doi:10.1038/news070226-11

None more black

Engineers make the most anti-reflective coating yet.

Dave Mosher



Layers of tilted silicon nanorods make a soft landing for light.Fred Schubert/Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Shiny metal objects have been reduced to a dull, record-breaking black by a super anti-reflective coating. As Nigel Tufnel from This is Spinal Tap says in the film: "It's like, how much more black could this be? And the answer is none. None more black."

Today's anti-reflective coatings reduce the reflectivity of an object to less than 1%, which is pretty good. But they often miss a few chunks of the visible spectrum. Magnesium fluoride anti-reflective coating applied to camera lenses, for example, prevents oranges, yellows, greens and blues from bouncing away (which helps to funnel more light into the lens), but misses violet and red wavelengths to create purple reflections.

"At some wavelengths, today's coatings are effective," says Fred Schubert, a member of the research team at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York state. "But over all visible wavelengths, our coating is 10 times better than the best anti-reflective coating out there."

The team reports its work in the March issue of Nature Photonics1.

Light as air

Reflection occurs when light hits a material with a dramatically different 'refractive index'. In simple terms, a refractive index tells how fast light can travel through a material — the denser the material is, the slower light travels, and the higher the index. This is part of the reason why diamonds sparkle so brilliantly — they are made of very dense material and have a refractive index of 2.4, in comparison to air's 1.0.

The new coating has a refractive index of 1.05, cutting reflection to less than 0.1%. On a clear material, such as glass, that makes for a perfectly clear surface without glare. On an opaque material, it makes for the blackest black yet.

The coating is built of silica rods, each 2,000 times thinner than a human hair, sticking up at an angle from the surface like a slightly flattened lawn. Layers of these nanorods can be stacked up on each other, each a little bit less crowded than the one below.

The rods are deposited in a chamber that Schubert says is similar to a cathode ray tube found in old TV sets. The electron gun in the tube allows the coating's density — and refractive index — to be controlled with extreme precision. The gradual changes in layer density gently guide light towards the material, instead of having it slam into a hard, reflective surface.

Apply to surface

Anti-reflective coatings are currently used on everything from prescription glasses to computer monitors, telescopes and solar panels. Sometimes the goal is to prevent annoying glare, sometimes it's there to ensure that the material gathers as much light energy as possible. Either way, says Schubert, the new coating should perform better than what's out there already.

So far they have tested the coating on aluminum nitride, a promising light-emitting diode (LED) material. Cutting down on reflection can brighten outgoing light by ensuring that none of it is bounced off in a non-useful direction. "LEDs are incredibly energy-efficient light sources, but with our material they could make them 40% more efficient," Schubert says.

Objects that don't reflect light may also be of use to quantum physicists investigating mysterious black-body radiation. "Our anti-reflective coatings allow someone to get closer to black-body radiation than ever before," Schubert says.

But the coating is more complex than other anti-reflectives, which usually rely on one layer to get rid of reflection and can't achieve an air-like refractive index.

So will this super anti-glare coating make it onto prescription glasses any time soon? Kevin Robbie, a material physicist at Queen's University in Kingston, Canada, says a big hurdle for the coating is its fragility. "It could get wet, but rubbing it would destroy the coating," he says.

Jay Senkevich, a materials scientist with the high-tech microelectronics company Brewer Science in Rolla, Missouri, has other concerns. "The problem is manufacturing this stuff," he says; depositing the rods at a tilt is, he says, a difficult thing and can only be done on flat surfaces. "If things get too complex, it's hard to make money off of it." Schubert, however, thinks there's hope for the intricate coating.

Visit our newsblog to read and post comments about this story.

 Top
References

  1. Xi J.-Q., et al. Nature Photonics, 1 . 176 - 179 (2007). | Article |


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: black; coatings; fresnelreflection; optics; refractiveindex; science

1 posted on 03/02/2007 11:59:26 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To dumb it down: The old stuff was just merely Byron Allen. The new stuff is like a Yaphet Kotto or Grace Jones.


2 posted on 03/03/2007 12:31:11 AM PST by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This could be huge if it can be made to fabricate gear and clothing for our troops.


3 posted on 03/03/2007 12:33:02 AM PST by thegreatbeast (Selling Carbon Offsets since 2007. Get right with Gaia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Same topic, another article, more comments:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1793650/posts.
4 posted on 03/03/2007 1:07:27 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast

According to this article, they'd look black (because people are opaque). Otherwise, as another freeper pointed out on another related thread, they'd look naked.


5 posted on 03/03/2007 1:08:40 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Neat post!


6 posted on 03/03/2007 1:34:33 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

Thanks for the link.


7 posted on 03/03/2007 2:15:08 AM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Seems like a great color for the B-2 Bomber and F-22.It benifit their stealthiness greatly.The B-2 is black already but with that coating on it No light will reflect back.


8 posted on 03/03/2007 2:38:25 AM PST by puppypusher (The world is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
The new stuff is like a Yaphet Kotto or Grace Jones.

Invisible since circa 1990.

9 posted on 03/03/2007 2:46:28 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

At first, I thought it was a Barak Obama article.


10 posted on 03/03/2007 2:52:57 AM PST by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"It looks like death."


11 posted on 03/03/2007 3:52:29 AM PST by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Big dog, big dog, bow-wow-wow! We'll crush crime, now, now, now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball

Grace Jones. What a blast from the past. Man, she is one ugly individual. I wonder how time has treated her?


12 posted on 03/03/2007 4:08:38 AM PST by Twisted knickers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Twisted knickers
Man, she is one ugly individual.

Chacun à son goût. This doesn't look ugly to me:

-ccm

13 posted on 03/03/2007 5:29:59 AM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I don't understand it all, but very interesting.


14 posted on 03/03/2007 5:38:18 AM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Yes, but wouldn't a true blackbody be invisible? If you can see it, some light is reflecting back, no?


15 posted on 03/03/2007 6:13:05 AM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"The gradual changes in layer density gently guide light towards the material, instead of having it slam into a hard, reflective surface."

That phrase makes light sound like an acoustic phenomenon. At the nano scale, it probably acts like one.

16 posted on 03/03/2007 7:46:43 AM PST by NicknamedBob (I know where I have gone wrong, and I can cite it, chapter and verse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
Chacun à son goût. This doesn't look ugly to me:

"Chacun à son goût", Maybe to a Frenchman. She is a beast

17 posted on 03/03/2007 7:51:48 AM PST by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ARE SOLE; ccmay

Ah, the Warm Leatherette.


18 posted on 03/03/2007 11:48:33 AM PST by printhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson