Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill aims to crack down on nudity
katu.com ^ | 03/23/07 | Thom Jensen and KATU Web Staff

Posted on 03/23/2007 5:14:18 PM PDT by Ellesu

SALEM, Ore. - Supporters of a bill being considered by state lawmakers say it would close a loophole in the state's private indecency law.

House Bill 3317 would amend the law by making exposure illegal when it is in view of a place where another person has an expectation of privacy.

For instance, it would make it illegal to run around your yard naked in view of others.

That is what Rainier's so-called "naked neighbor" Jimmy "Mack" McKenzie has been doing for years.

A Team 2 investigation on McKenzie's nude - and some would say lewd - behavior outside his home drew national attention. The 59-year-old was caught on video walking around his yard naked. But the sheriff's department and district attorney said he did not break the law - even if he was in full view of children.

Currently Oregon has two nudity laws: public indecency and private indecency.

But neither addresses a neighbor exposing himself or herself to another person when both people are on private property.

"We wouldn't want a situation where people are doing things that are really in conflict with community standards," said Rep. Greg MacPherson, a Lake Oswego Democrat who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, which is considering the bill. "And just because they are standing on their own property, that it isn't against the law."

D.J. Darco is a victim in an unrelated indecent exposure case that couldn't be prosecuted under Oregon law. She is also a longtime advocate for changing the law. She said she hopes the legislature makes acts like McKenzie's illegal.

"We want a simplified law," she said. "A law that is simple to prosecute these people when we need to."



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: nudity; oregon; wierdos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 03/23/2007 5:14:21 PM PDT by Ellesu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

They said "crack."


2 posted on 03/23/2007 5:18:18 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (RIP Mr. Brightside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
We want a simplified law

Only attractive people (and we all know who those are) are allowed to be naked in public.

There, that should do it.

3 posted on 03/23/2007 5:20:17 PM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

I would never run around naked in my yard, but I don't think the government needs to get involved in this. Stick to running the government. Cut budgets!!!!


4 posted on 03/23/2007 5:22:00 PM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
If Global Warming made him take his clothes off, case closed.

Nice women should be first, though.

5 posted on 03/23/2007 5:22:07 PM PDT by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
Bill aims to crack down on nudity

If they outlaw nudity, only outlaws will be nude.

6 posted on 03/23/2007 5:25:47 PM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

I'm 50 y.o. and no one in my family has ever been naked.


7 posted on 03/23/2007 5:26:26 PM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
I'm 50 y.o. and no one in my family has ever been naked.

I have to hear this story.
8 posted on 03/23/2007 5:29:04 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Just say "No" to Crack.


9 posted on 03/23/2007 5:30:14 PM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Damn, I thought they were upset at my naked trampoline jumping above fence level because I wasn't wearing a helmet. Why didn't I think of the children!?


10 posted on 03/23/2007 5:33:50 PM PDT by M203M4 (Ignorance of basic math underlies economic ignorance and helps fuel socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator; Slings and Arrows

Embarrassed to have company over? to entertain outdoors?

Solution: Invite a crowd of women over, really cute, young women. He gives you eyesight pollution; you give him noise pollution. Make sure their "critique" of your nature loving neighbor's body flaws can be heard. The volume of the barbs can be aided with liberal application of alchohol to your guests. Let him hear you "defend" his honor as a good neighbor should with such kind remarks as, "Look, I'm sure it'll happen to ALL of us...eventually..." and "Pshaw, that's probably from whatever he was sitting on before he came outside."


11 posted on 03/23/2007 5:50:07 PM PDT by Titan Magroyne ("Y'know, I've always thought of politics as show business for ugly people." Jay Leno:Al Gore 11/29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Picture this:


12 posted on 03/23/2007 5:51:28 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
House Bill 3317 would amend the law by making exposure illegal when it is in view of a place where another person has an expectation of privacy.

How about simply making nudity illegal when:

  1. It is within view of someone who does not want to see it
  2. The nude person should expect that it might be in view of someone who does not want to see it.
  3. The person seeing it is has, or would have but for the nude person's actions, a reasonable expectation of not seeing that person, nor anyone else of similar sex and age, nude.
I fail to see what the observer's "expectation of privacy" has to do with anything. If the observer's lawn is completely visible from a public right of way, and the nude person is only visible from the observer's lawn and not from any public right of way, then I wouldn't think even this new bill would cover that.
13 posted on 03/23/2007 6:01:13 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

OK! OK, I see your point!!!


14 posted on 03/23/2007 6:09:47 PM PDT by panzer_grey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

I really can't help it I was born that way.


15 posted on 03/23/2007 6:14:54 PM PDT by antti tuuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

My questions...Why is Santa naked, and why is he holding binoculars? And did Jane Goodall snap that photo of him in the wild in the first place? LOL!

16 posted on 03/23/2007 6:15:47 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

That does it! I'm going outside naked!


(as soon as it gets dark)


17 posted on 03/23/2007 6:19:25 PM PDT by mad puppy (That was one rough Monday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

http://www.katu.com/news/5839256.html

more pics here:)


18 posted on 03/23/2007 6:28:24 PM PDT by Ellesu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

No, thanks. Just had my dinner. ;)


19 posted on 03/23/2007 6:30:04 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: billorites

50 years of sponge baths?


20 posted on 03/23/2007 7:04:44 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson