Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Concealed-gun demand skyrockets after shootings
Salt Lake Tribune ^ | 04/02/2007 | Glen Warchol

Posted on 04/02/2007 11:06:43 AM PDT by neverdem

Some cops aren't happy with the booming ranks of undertrained carriers

Utah's Bureau of Criminal Identification, already overwhelmed by an upward swing in concealed weapon permit applications, is seeing a further wave in demand following the Trolley Square tragedy in February.

BCI Chief Ed McConkie says that after a lag of about two weeks - about the time it takes to attend firearms safety classes and get fingerprinted and photographed - the applications started to pour in for the required criminal background checks.

"It almost doubled after the Trolley Square shootings for a couple of weeks," McConkie says. "We are getting 400 to 500 a day. Before, it was 200-270."

Though Utah has been issuing about six of 10 permits to out-of-state residents, this new wave is driven by Utahns, he says.

"The Trolley Square shootings was a horrific, historic, violent act," McConkie says. "People reacted in different ways. Many people wanted a concealed carry permit and people who had let their permits go dormant reapplied."

Firearms instructor Clark Aposhian says his classes, usually with fewer than 10 students, have swelled to 20 or 30. "Since the 13th of February, I'm teaching easily 150 a week."

Aposhian says he has been asked to train 45 employees from one company and even a large Salt Lake church group. He declined to identify them.

Aposhian says many of his students ask him what they should do if confronted with a Trolley Square scenario. "Do whatever it takes to go home every night," Aposhian says. "There is no expectation [for a concealed weapon carrier] to engage."

If a door to safety is available - take it, Aposhian tells his students. "But if there's a man with a shotgun between you and that door - the situation changes. We do not encourage nor discourage engagement."

If an increased number of Utah citizens are taking comfort in concealed handguns, some police officers are not. Besides the difficulty of differentiating between a well-meaning citizen with a weapon and a criminal with one, Department of Public Safety spokesman Sgt. Jeff Nigbur says officers are trained to respond in life-or-death situations.

"An officer receives a lot of training," Nigbur says. For instance, "Before moving out with guns blazing to help out the situation, an officer is going to take in to account the backdrop - who is behind that drywall that I'm going to put five rounds through? Will a regular citizen consider that? I know an officer does." gwarchol@sltrib.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

1 posted on 04/02/2007 11:06:51 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Eeeexcellent!

(Picture of Mr. Burns here)


2 posted on 04/02/2007 11:10:49 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (No to nitwit jesters with a predisposition of self importance and unqualified political opinions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Police Officer's Union does not support the 2nd Amendment.
No encroaching on their sheep herding jobs is allowed.
No mention of the ROP either just a big ole trust us we got your back.


3 posted on 04/02/2007 11:12:12 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
If a door to safety is available - take it, Aposhian tells his students. "But if there's a man with a shotgun between you and that door - the situation changes. We do not encourage nor discourage engagement."

Well worded...

4 posted on 04/02/2007 11:12:26 AM PDT by BRITinUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
about the time it takes to attend firearms safety classes and get fingerprinted and photographed

All unconstitutional infringements.

5 posted on 04/02/2007 11:12:33 AM PDT by zarf (Her hair was of a dank yellow, and fell over her temples like sauerkraut......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Some cops aren't happy with the booming ranks of undertrained carriers

...

"An officer receives a lot of training," Nigbur says. For instance, "Before moving out with guns blazing to help out the situation, an officer is going to take in to account the backdrop - who is behind that drywall that I'm going to put five rounds through? Will a regular citizen consider that? I know an officer does."

Perhaps the officers should work harder to put their rounds ON TARGET, instead of shooting at the drywall. /sarcasm

The spokesman seems to forget that police are NOT sworn to "protect and serve" (i.e.: they have not specific duty to protect someone, per the courts). The police generally do a pretty good job of doing their job, but each citizen is ultimately responsible for his or her own safety. So the police don't believe that the citizens should be able to protect themselves?

Happiness is a tight shot grouping.

6 posted on 04/02/2007 11:18:09 AM PDT by MortMan (Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
(i.e.: they have not specific duty to protect someone, per the courts)

Not completely true, and usually cited by people unfamiliar with the law in general.

7 posted on 04/02/2007 11:20:00 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Where is the projectile vomit alert tag?


Cops are better trained than citizens. Just how many COMBAT vets are in Utah, vs how many cops who have only shot at paper targets?

Please spare me Mr Cop Official, Alaska has no license to CCW and I haven't seen any Old West shoot outs.

Maybe, just maybe, because the bad guys know just about anyone could be carrying, things are pretty quiet here of late - excluding the gang on gang violence.

8 posted on 04/02/2007 11:20:43 AM PDT by ASOC (Yeah, well, maybe - but can you *prove* it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Some cops aren't happy with the booming ranks of undertrained carriers

I would lay odds that a lot of CCWers (myself included), train a lot more than your average police officer.

9 posted on 04/02/2007 11:21:36 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The police are worried???? Wasn't it not too long ago when a bunch of cops fired over 500 shots at a suspect and only a few shots hit their target? I think people are more capable than they want to give credit to.


10 posted on 04/02/2007 11:28:02 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"undertrained"??

In my research for a private position paper several years ago, I uncovered hints of a dirty little secret: there appear to be more incidents of the violation of firearms policy by police officers than violations of firearms laws by concealed carry permitees.

My research on this topic came to a end after only meeting a brick wall whenever I tried to get concrete facts and documents on this topic from various metropolitan police departments.

So, until someone else is able to pick up that baton and carry it with some authority, we will just have to let public statistics on the rate of CCW violations speak without any comparison to a "control group" of the law enforcement community.

The record of CCW holders is pretty stunning. In Florida, the rate of abuse was so low that the department charged with keeping the statistics asked the legislature to be allowed to allocate manpower elsewhere.

In Texas, according to an article dated 2000 by the NCPA:

"Licensees were 5.7 times less likely to be arrested for violent offenses than the general public - 127 per 100,000 population versus 730 per 100,000."

see:
http://www.ncpa.org/ba/ba324/ba324.html

There is one more benefit to having a large CCW population: it is a voting block. Once you get your CCW, have carried for a while, and have felt the significant difference between fearing you might be a victim and knowing you don't have to be, you will never want give up your right to choose again (that is, choose to defend yourself rather than surrender).

11 posted on 04/02/2007 11:30:10 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
Even as the so-called "authorities" continue their PC mantra of "no known cause" for the Trolley Square incident, it appears that John and Jane Doe are taking steps to acquire some quick, symptomatic relief for "sudden jihad syndrome"...

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

12 posted on 04/02/2007 11:30:16 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have two speeds: "graze" and "stampede".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
As a resident of New Jersey, I realize that it would be very dangerous for me to be armed. I am not well trained in self defense. My reflexes are slow. I would be much better off taking a beating from a thug in a minor robbery than defending myself. Worse case scenario, I get stabbed a few times....no big deal, we have excellent health care facilities in NJ.
No, the only people who deserve protection in NJ are politicians and off duty cops....the rest of us are too stupid....thats why we keep voting the way we do.
13 posted on 04/02/2007 11:31:01 AM PDT by Fred911 (YOU GET WHAT YOU ACCEPT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Oh no.. people getting their CCW...

The person that wrote this story better not look up the req's for my state.. WA, go in, get printed, pay the lady at the front desk... Bingo!!!!

CPL in the mail in under a week...


Yes I do have mine... Though I have no formal training, I do regularly practice with my EDC's... I hope I never have to use EDC, but I for one do not want to be some BS # in a "Mall shooting" statistic...

My wife even agrees that having my CPL is a good thing, and she is neither for nor against firearms... but she's a hell of a shot with the .22


14 posted on 04/02/2007 11:35:01 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan


Anti-gun lobbyists get away with proposing to completely disarm the citizens only because most citizens just assume the police will protect them. That assumption is false.

The police cannot protect everyone -- in fact the police usually have no legal duty to protect anyone. Dial 911 and Die proves this fact. For nearly every American state and territory, this book shows how the police owe no legal duty to protect individuals from crime. The police in most places do not even have to come when you call.
excerpted from JPFO.org
15 posted on 04/02/2007 11:37:50 AM PDT by Tucson_AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Though Utah has been issuing about six of 10 permits to out-of-state residents, this new wave is driven by Utahns, he says.

This I find somewhat bizarre. Surely the vast majority of people in Utah are residents, so why would 60% of permit applications come from non-residents? Do California or Texas have laws requiring them to recognize out of state carry permits or something?

16 posted on 04/02/2007 11:38:49 AM PDT by elmer fudd (Fukoku kyohei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucson_AZ
in fact the police usually have no legal duty to protect anyone

Further, they have a legal "out" if they do not respond in time. It's call indemnification.

17 posted on 04/02/2007 11:41:50 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Some cops aren't happy with the booming ranks of undertrained carriers

Under trained? LMAO... I've seen the off-duty cops shooting at one of the local ranges. The safest place to be is standing right in front of them...

18 posted on 04/02/2007 11:44:52 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Before moving out with guns blazing to help out the situation, an officer is going to take in to account the backdrop - who is behind that drywall that I'm going to put five rounds through? Will a regular citizen consider that? I know an officer does."

When you have the luxury of enough time to assess the situation, taking the backdrop into consideration is certainly sound policy.
I've seen enough police videos of shootouts to know that when the adrenalin is pumping and the lead is flying in their direction, there aren't too many cops who appear to be worried about who might be behind that drywall.

19 posted on 04/02/2007 11:46:07 AM PDT by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Looks like the people know jihad when they see it. And seem to know what to do about it.


20 posted on 04/02/2007 11:46:25 AM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson