NARAL in 2000 refused to choose between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Rudy Giuliani because they were equally pro abortion.
1 posted on
04/13/2007 7:49:14 AM PDT by
pissant
To: pissant
Waiting on the Rudybots to defend the indefensible.
2 posted on
04/13/2007 7:55:38 AM PDT by
Pistolshot
(Thompson '08)
To: pissant
Why did you have to go and post this?
Now all the Rudybots will come swarming in here defending their “man.”
:-)
3 posted on
04/13/2007 7:59:24 AM PDT by
upchuck
(A living, breathing example of the Peter Principle. Oh, forgetful, too :)
To: pissant
I think the more damaging thing for Rudy on this issue is his very clear support for tax-payer funded abortions.
8 posted on
04/13/2007 8:24:25 AM PDT by
ElectricStrawberry
(27th Infantry Regiment....cut in half during the Clinton years......WOLFHOUNDS!!!!)
To: pissant
At least JulieAnnie's rating has bottomed and he has no where to go but UP!!!!!....lol
If you think the Republican Party is just NOT LIBERAL ENOUGH,,,,and needs to move a lot further to the LEFT,,,,
JulieAnnie is JUST THE MAN FOR THE JOB!!!
9 posted on
04/13/2007 8:26:47 AM PDT by
stockstrader
("I want a conservative President who will be a 'pit-bull' in the War on Liberalism too"!)
To: pissant
This is one of those “First Principles” where a candidate’s stand on one issue calls into question his entire political agenda and even his mental/emotional fitness to serve in office.
13 posted on
04/13/2007 8:45:02 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson