Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Is making things up out of whole cloth part of your 'conservatism?'
No. They didn’t even try to hide it. I’m a class of ‘98 freeper and there has always been a very loud and noxious cadre of liberals here. They usually supported the party establishment, which is far more liberal than the grassroots. That’s why most of them supported President Bush’s poorest decisions, Alberto Gonzalez, open borders, Harriett Miers, ect..and they would be on the left side of every discussion about abortion, gays, or political correctness tyranny.
Since liberals are emotional creatures, they escalate very quickly. They don’t respond to facts and won’t even take on a post of more than a few lines, calling it “spam.” They quickly go to thrashing about and calling names, or using repetition. Once they get emotional, since being a liberal is what they are, not what they believe, they can’t put the brakes on. You saw people here that didn’t know when to shut up, or when to control their urge to tear down the man who runs the forum, or when to stop posting lies about other candidates or Ronald Reagan or whatever. No emotional brakes...
A few months back, this forum was being taken over by them. I went and spent some time at Liberty Post because here, a different liberal was dominating and policing every thread. I actually thought they were organizing. It was bad...
Many of them can’t stand us. I have no idea why they are Republicans. I guess it’s the east coast/cosmopolitan thing. It takes all kinds. It truly takes a coalition to win and be viable, but somebody here said it, we must make our philosophy acceptable to others, not surrender and be like the Democrats.
Rudy Giuliani has done us all a service because he has brought the contempt for social and religious conservatives out into the open.
“However, the GOP as currently constituted believes that it their duty to impose “Judeo Christian” values (as they interpret them) on everyone.”
Dang, that sounds like it’s right out of the WashCompost. Is this the same GOP that’s establishment is currently behind Giuliani who supports abortion, extragay rights, restrictions on guns and open borders?
mariabush wrote: “The cancer that you should be worring about is liberalism...”
Amen, Sister, Amen!
You're looking for a confrontation with me. I'm NOT gonna give you total satisfaction. But I will answer two points you posted.
>>>>>But to compare Reagan to "Bush43" in your view is wrong?
That's what I said and that's what I've told you before. Dubya has done fine on social issues, tax cuts and with appointment of justices. He's done okay in the WOT. Iraq is progressing. We shall see. But Bush43 is no Reagan. Period.
More importantly, comparing Rudy Giuliani to Ronald Reagan is an insult to the Reagan legacy. Rudy is a liberal. Reagan was a conservative.
>>>>>>LOL! Sounds like political correctness to me.
Sounds like you can't tell the difference of right from wrong, good from great, and liberal from conservative. So be it.
Thank heavens I wasn’t wearing my 3D glasses for that.
“All she said was that Reagan was pro-choice before he changed to pro-life.”
utter bullshit, she was trying to get the boot and was warned.
*stunned silence* - Well, read Aristotle, then, both thick volumes of “Complete works”, Princeton/Bollingen series LXXI - and I promise that you’ll be even more stunned. For example, you will learn that the fart and the burp are the same thing [but proceeding differently] - the former the “lower breath”, the latter - the upper. [”Problemata, 33. 9]. Ponder the profundity of it, for it is far from a superficial statement. Aristotle’s texts are not to be read glibly, but pondered.
HEAR HEAR!!!
And that includes RINOs.
Lots of that going around. :) Reminds one of grammar school and the ole’ playground.
What was I saying...mmm....Just last nite. Man I’m good. LOL
It won’t be Hillary.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/04/22/wgore22.xml
You are WAY too knowledgeable for a newbie. Been lurking long? :)
freepmail
Did Reagan cut and run from Lebanon?
Seems to me that Bush is more Reagan than Reagan.
bttt
Giving birth apparently nukes your brain cells. I had to look this up.
I’m not keen on hyperbole, so your absurd reference to 1939 did not sit well with me. Now you’re trying to justify that comment. Unbelievable. Again, given your anger lately, I’m not surprised, but hey, it’s your choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.