Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Criminalizing thoughts as well as actions, and creating special categories of victims is unconstitutional," said Tony Perkins, FRC president.

I hate the 237 weasels who voted for this travesty!

1 posted on 05/03/2007 1:03:02 PM PDT by EShellenberger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EShellenberger
Liberals declare conservatism a hate crime. Film at 11.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

2 posted on 05/03/2007 1:04:49 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger
It'll pass the Senate too. ....probably with even less difficulty.

Chances the President signs the damn thing?

3 posted on 05/03/2007 1:08:01 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger

Which of the Weasels were Pubicrats????....Names Please....


4 posted on 05/03/2007 1:08:28 PM PDT by Postman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger

Wow! The Rats are pissing all over the Constitution!


5 posted on 05/03/2007 1:08:54 PM PDT by 4yearlurker (Liberals, A terrorists best friend!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger
Three Cheers for the defenders of the Republic- sig heil, Sig Heil, SIG HEIL
6 posted on 05/03/2007 1:11:35 PM PDT by 11th Commandment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger
This LEFTIST bill is about controlling speech. Relatives tell me a similar bill passed in Canada and certain passages of the Bible, or even references to them, can not now be displayed in public.
7 posted on 05/03/2007 1:12:45 PM PDT by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger
I hate the 237 weasels who voted for this travesty!

Careful, there - hatred of 'Rats will be the next "thought crime" to be defined by these budding commissars.

10 posted on 05/03/2007 1:14:44 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger

This is curious. I called my House rep and was told this bill had gone back to committee.


11 posted on 05/03/2007 1:15:30 PM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger

The Minority Report, 1984, and It Can’t Happen Here, all in one convenient legislative package.

Might as well dress it up a little and call it the Enabling Acts.


12 posted on 05/03/2007 1:15:33 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger

Law can establish penalties for actions, not for thoughts, intentions or wishes. Any law that penalizes for thoughts, intentions or wishes is invalid.
Problem is that the whole judicial system is complicit and won’t accept what I just said. This means that the whole judicial system is corrupt.
Also, if you contacted your senator/congressperson, it was a waste of time. This law was going to be passed no matter what the people thought.


14 posted on 05/03/2007 1:19:26 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (democratic government becomes less democratic over time, and tends inexorably toward totalitarianism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger

This will last about 2 days before the supreme court strikes it down for violating the equal protection clause.


17 posted on 05/03/2007 1:26:44 PM PDT by lesser_satan (FRED THOMPSON '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger

Careful. Hating them is a thought crime. ;)


23 posted on 05/03/2007 1:37:11 PM PDT by Xenalyte (Cheese . . . milk's leap toward immortality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger

Thought Crime bill? When I read the headline, I thought this was an anti flag burning bill...


26 posted on 05/03/2007 1:39:32 PM PDT by LibertarianSJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger
I’m not nearly as conservative on social issues as many on FR. I’m to the right of Rudy for sure but that’s not too hard.

So what is amazing to me is for once I agree with James Dobson. This bill is nothing more than an attempt to muzzle ANYBODY who, in public statement or writing, says anything negative about homosexuality.

More specifically what would happen is some minister will say homosexuality is a sin (which it is), and some numbnutt who attended that same church at SOME point in his life goes off and commits a violent crime against a homosexual, then the state can come after the minister for inciting a hate crime.

Anybody who denies this would be the outcome (John Conyers) is either naive or a liar or both.

30 posted on 05/03/2007 1:46:37 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (New York politicians do not think or believe like Americans. ...Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ..
""Criminalizing thoughts as well as actions, and creating special categories of victims is unconstitutional," said Tony Perkins, FRC president."





Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
35 posted on 05/03/2007 4:56:01 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger

Holding my breath for the ACLU to denounce it...

Ya’ll better come check on me if I ain’t back in a few days.


39 posted on 05/03/2007 5:29:01 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; The majority are satisfied with a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger
The elected representatives of this Republic used to go to Washington briefly to act on the Nation's business, and then go home.

This was before the invention of HVAC.

Maybe we should ban HVAC in all government buildings in Washington, DC.

41 posted on 05/03/2007 7:35:02 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; AFA-Michigan; Agitate; Alexander Rubin; AliVeritas; ...
Shame on the Republicans who voted for this piece of work. Non-conservatives. Enemies of freedom of speech and religious expression.

Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping lists.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

42 posted on 05/03/2007 9:23:43 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Only those who thirst for truth can know truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger

Despicable. Agreed.


43 posted on 05/03/2007 9:25:45 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (Mitt Romney for President '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EShellenberger

God help us. I guess it’s time for the end.


49 posted on 05/04/2007 12:30:10 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson