"Criminalizing thoughts as well as actions, and creating special categories of victims is unconstitutional," said Tony Perkins, FRC president. I hate the 237 weasels who voted for this travesty!
To: EShellenberger
Liberals declare conservatism a hate crime. Film at 11.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
2 posted on
05/03/2007 1:04:49 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: EShellenberger
It'll pass the Senate too. ....probably with even less difficulty.
Chances the President signs the damn thing?
3 posted on
05/03/2007 1:08:01 PM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: EShellenberger
Which of the Weasels were Pubicrats????....Names Please....
4 posted on
05/03/2007 1:08:28 PM PDT by
Postman
To: EShellenberger
Wow! The Rats are pissing all over the Constitution!
5 posted on
05/03/2007 1:08:54 PM PDT by
4yearlurker
(Liberals, A terrorists best friend!)
To: EShellenberger
Three Cheers for the defenders of the Republic- sig heil, Sig Heil, SIG HEIL
To: EShellenberger
This LEFTIST bill is about controlling speech. Relatives tell me a similar bill passed in Canada and certain passages of the Bible, or even references to them, can not now be displayed in public.
7 posted on
05/03/2007 1:12:45 PM PDT by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: EShellenberger
I hate the 237 weasels who voted for this travesty!Careful, there - hatred of 'Rats will be the next "thought crime" to be defined by these budding commissars.
To: EShellenberger
This is curious. I called my House rep and was told this bill had gone back to committee.
To: EShellenberger
The Minority Report, 1984, and It Can’t Happen Here, all in one convenient legislative package.
Might as well dress it up a little and call it the Enabling Acts.
12 posted on
05/03/2007 1:15:33 PM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: EShellenberger
Law can establish penalties for actions, not for thoughts, intentions or wishes. Any law that penalizes for thoughts, intentions or wishes is invalid.
Problem is that the whole judicial system is complicit and won’t accept what I just said. This means that the whole judicial system is corrupt.
Also, if you contacted your senator/congressperson, it was a waste of time. This law was going to be passed no matter what the people thought.
14 posted on
05/03/2007 1:19:26 PM PDT by
Leftism is Mentally Deranged
(democratic government becomes less democratic over time, and tends inexorably toward totalitarianism)
To: EShellenberger
This will last about 2 days before the supreme court strikes it down for violating the equal protection clause.
17 posted on
05/03/2007 1:26:44 PM PDT by
lesser_satan
(FRED THOMPSON '08)
To: EShellenberger
Careful. Hating them is a thought crime. ;)
23 posted on
05/03/2007 1:37:11 PM PDT by
Xenalyte
(Cheese . . . milk's leap toward immortality.)
To: EShellenberger
Thought Crime bill? When I read the headline, I thought this was an anti flag burning bill...
To: EShellenberger
I’m not nearly as conservative on social issues as many on FR. I’m to the right of Rudy for sure but that’s not too hard.
So what is amazing to me is for once I agree with James Dobson. This bill is nothing more than an attempt to muzzle ANYBODY who, in public statement or writing, says anything negative about homosexuality.
More specifically what would happen is some minister will say homosexuality is a sin (which it is), and some numbnutt who attended that same church at SOME point in his life goes off and commits a violent crime against a homosexual, then the state can come after the minister for inciting a hate crime.
Anybody who denies this would be the outcome (John Conyers) is either naive or a liar or both.
30 posted on
05/03/2007 1:46:37 PM PDT by
Artemis Webb
(New York politicians do not think or believe like Americans. ...Thompson 2008)
To: EShellenberger; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ..
""Criminalizing thoughts as well as actions, and creating special categories of victims is unconstitutional," said Tony Perkins, FRC president."
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
35 posted on
05/03/2007 4:56:01 PM PDT by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: EShellenberger
Holding my breath for the ACLU to denounce it...
Ya’ll better come check on me if I ain’t back in a few days.
39 posted on
05/03/2007 5:29:01 PM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; The majority are satisfied with a just master. -- Sallust)
To: EShellenberger
The elected representatives of this Republic used to go to Washington briefly to act on the Nation's business, and then go home.
This was before the invention of HVAC.
Maybe we should ban HVAC in all government buildings in Washington, DC.
To: 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; AFA-Michigan; Agitate; Alexander Rubin; AliVeritas; ...
42 posted on
05/03/2007 9:23:43 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Only those who thirst for truth can know truth.)
To: EShellenberger
43 posted on
05/03/2007 9:25:45 PM PDT by
TAdams8591
(Mitt Romney for President '08)
To: EShellenberger
God help us. I guess it’s time for the end.
49 posted on
05/04/2007 12:30:10 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson