Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran: no one able to attack us
Press TV ^ | 5/06/07 | Press TV

Posted on 05/06/2007 11:07:05 AM PDT by freedom44

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: GoLightly

Darn, they were loaded with neutron warheads. Oops again!


21 posted on 05/06/2007 11:49:40 AM PDT by James W. Fannin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tioga

I think he’s still hard at work on the terms of surrender in Afghanistan.


22 posted on 05/06/2007 11:54:31 AM PDT by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MikeHu

I bet he is advising reid and nancy on Iraq as well.


23 posted on 05/06/2007 11:56:34 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
He added Iran's army with an eight year experience of war and modern tactics

Mastered the P38 in garrison or field conditions.

24 posted on 05/06/2007 11:57:59 AM PDT by Ieatfrijoles ("Some hams hanging in the kitchen were taken out for burial")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

Baghdad Bob has a new gig.


25 posted on 05/06/2007 11:58:38 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James W. Fannin

I don’t think we have a lot of problems with a good share of the population. It is the leadership & their minions that have got to go.


26 posted on 05/06/2007 11:58:52 AM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

This ayatollah’s certainly in agreement with our spineless MSM/DNC motormouths.


27 posted on 05/06/2007 11:59:51 AM PDT by umgud ("When seconds count, the police are just 10 minutes away!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Here is my guess...

Trident II D-5 Fleet Ballistic Missile


28 posted on 05/06/2007 12:00:24 PM PDT by Lost Dutchman (I thought WWI started because some bloke named Archie Duke shot an ostrich because he was hungry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tioga

That won’t be necessary.

The French socialist candidate just became available.


29 posted on 05/06/2007 12:01:16 PM PDT by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freedom44; jveritas
"A top military advisor to the Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Sayed Ali Khamenei says no country has the ability to attack Iran."

A big thank you to the Democrats of America and a big thank you to the "macho-conservatives" of America who are teaching the Republicans a "lesson!" Without you, this wouldn't have been possible!


30 posted on 05/06/2007 12:01:44 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
"Do I smell a hint of bull shit here."

He said as he used a trowel to scrape 6 inches of brown stuff off of his face!

31 posted on 05/06/2007 12:03:33 PM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Wave Britainnia...Britannia waives the rules!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MikeHu

LOL


32 posted on 05/06/2007 12:03:34 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lost Dutchman
Ding Ding Ding - we have a winner!

Extra points for nominal yield and max yield (both surprising number I would add)

33 posted on 05/06/2007 12:04:02 PM PDT by ASOC (Yeah, well, maybe - but can you *prove* it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

Taiwan said something similar about China last week. I guess these kinds of statements must be for internal consumption.


34 posted on 05/06/2007 12:04:05 PM PDT by gondramB (God only has ten rules, uncle Hank, and he has a much bigger house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

Ah, see post #28, it’s a D5 SLBM warhead...the W88 to be exact.


35 posted on 05/06/2007 12:06:11 PM PDT by ASOC (Yeah, well, maybe - but can you *prove* it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly
It is the leadership & their minions that have got to go.

As long as we're not counting on the population to help us, and as long as we're not going to send our troops in without rendering them totally unable to fight back first, I'm OK with this policy.

But they won't be throwing flowers at us.

36 posted on 05/06/2007 12:11:55 PM PDT by James W. Fannin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ieatfrijoles

He added Iran’s army with an eight year experience of war and modern tactics

Considering that war was almost 20 years ago I think they’d do better as WW I. reinactors.

The American forces are the only ones current in war fighting and they are doing it on TWO fronts, we are
only now beginning to see the improvements this experience
has produced.


37 posted on 05/06/2007 12:20:06 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tet68

He’s probably thinking Congress will defund our military in the middle of the attack.


38 posted on 05/06/2007 12:26:21 PM PDT by James W. Fannin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: James W. Fannin

We attack them, we become the common enemy. No flowers for us. We become too overt in helping an overthrow, be too much of a reminder about something we did in the past. Again, no flowers for us.

Thinking out LOUD about an Arab culture having domination over Persians, we don’t need no stinkin flowers, but we do wonder when Persians are gonna reclaim their balls from the Arabs.

The reverse psychology they’re trying out against the US to draw us in (per this article), which will prop up Iranian nationalism against an outside foe deserves a counter along the same vein.


39 posted on 05/06/2007 12:32:36 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly

It always ends in the same cycle, these threads. Think about it.


40 posted on 05/06/2007 12:36:04 PM PDT by James W. Fannin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson