Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Red Dawn scenario

Posted on 05/10/2007 2:57:33 PM PDT by wastedyears

Don't know how many people have seen this movie, but what are your thoughts on something like it happening? If so, who would be involved? Also, how easy or hard would it be to fight them back, taking into consideration their manpower?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: airmen; coldwar; coldwar2; cuba; genx; marines; reddawn; russia; sailors; soldiers; sovietunion; wolverines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-238 next last
To: wastedyears

what are your thoughts on something like it happening?

It’ll never happen.

Not necessary, the invading forces are already pouring in without guns. They’re here to defeat our culture not our military.


201 posted on 05/11/2007 2:23:05 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

I didnt understand that either.....


202 posted on 05/11/2007 3:15:25 PM PDT by Yorlik803 ( When are we going to draw a line a say"this far and no farther")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Vision
LOL! I see your point. However, I got the impression that there was a whole lot of fighting going on on both coasts, but the center of the country was pretty much occupied. So these people were fighting a guerrilla war.

Carolyn

203 posted on 05/13/2007 4:56:37 AM PDT by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

I agree that they made some moves towards reality, but oberall its a soap opera. The Brits do that type of grim apocalypsia tale so much better - check out The War game” or “Threads” for video examples. Even when they’re unrealistic, it is pl;ot silliness. The gritty details are fine.

As to literature, the Brits produced Death of Grass, the Triffids, The World in Winter, etc (they’’re just my favourites, though dated). Jericho’s makers could have read Alas Babylon and taken many good pointers on...also Resyrrection Day.

Ah well, it’s all fun, it just irritates me because if it had had a brutal real edge it would b an enduring classic not just a brief wonder.


204 posted on 05/13/2007 5:08:45 AM PDT by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
And he isn’t the brightest light I’ve ever seen either. Even his ill informed wife knew to shut the laptop off....

I can't argue with that...

205 posted on 05/13/2007 5:09:08 AM PDT by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Androcles

‘Jericho’ is to survival what West Wing was to the Whitehouse.

A liberal myth writ large. Took the town six months to wake up to the fact going without a firearm under such circumstances was hazzardous to your health.


206 posted on 05/14/2007 6:03:55 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

Plus their patrols are so tight they fail to warn of 100 plus refugees staggering into town...plus they never bother guarding drugs, etc., let alone armed patrols for farms, gas and food storage, etc.

Everyone still acts like it’s a brief interruption to normal life.Actually, no, they’ve finally begun getting a little better.

But it still pisses me off that they finally started using candles - not as survival lighting but as ambient lighting 0- ie rooms chock full of candles which they’d cheerfully leave unattended despite the difficulties of fire control in post-apocalypse america. Also, no one seems to have trouble getting candles or fears that they might run up before they gear up to render their own.


207 posted on 05/14/2007 6:36:02 AM PDT by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Androcles

We see it exactly the same way. Its ‘liberal survivalism’.

Which, if you think about it, tells you liberals can only survive in the society we’ve constructed in the last century.

Darwin’s theory comes into play, in short.


208 posted on 05/14/2007 6:37:51 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Androcles
I watched Red Dawn on TV today, about my third time seeing it. Deadliest Catch came onto record before the movie was over, so I popped in my DVD to finish it up-- even though I knew the ending, I couldn't just leave it! Yes, it can require a suspense of disbelief over the situations-- but I love the 80s Cold War feel, the premise, and the characters.

Androcles, you mentioned the Brits, but also there is a popular Australian book series about Australia being occupied by a foreign army (ethnicity/country of origin is never stated). It's for "young adults", but it's still one of my favorite book series - Tomorrow, When the War Began. Although it's not very realistic, I suppose; but it's like Red Dawn in which the scenario is very interesting.

I tried watching Jericho, but the characters drove me NUTS. They seemed ridiculously brainless. My mom and I couldn't stop laughing after a scene which I'm assuming was supposed to be dramatic. It was pretty melodramatic instead!

209 posted on 05/16/2007 3:30:56 AM PDT by sakka (Wolverines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: sakka

I’ve never seen Red Dawn but I know what you mean. As to the MArsden series, I’ve read them all so far and enjoyed them. While they’re unrealistic (re their success rate),, the basics are reasonably realistic especially in terms of the horror and the way that even in the peace their pretty world has been broken beyond redemption.

Jericho is fun, but as I’ve already said they are morons who don’t deserve to survive.

We’re of a like mind on these.


210 posted on 05/16/2007 3:31:26 PM PDT by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic
Red Dawn I believe was based on a now outdated CIA analysis of possible Soviet attempts to invade the US. At the time John Milnius produced the movie, glasnost and perestroika were starting to come about or had come about. If I recall, Aeroflot flights into Denver were being permitted at the time. Given the GRU had used the old commercial aircraft to deliver Spetsnaz trick in their invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968, the initial wave of paras coming in commercial airliners is not out of the question. The Sovs were also involved in attempting to spread Communism into Central America at the time (Contras were CIA backed guerillas trying to stop just such a thing).

As for the Chinese invading the US, try Eric Harry’s exciting novel INVASION, about a hypothetical future Chinese invasion. It’s speculation, but a great read nevertheless.

211 posted on 06/07/2007 8:37:18 PM PDT by Cold War Hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: qam1; ItsOurTimeNow; PresbyRev; Fraulein; StoneColdGOP; Clemenza; m18436572; InShanghai; xrp; ...

Xer Ping

Ping list for the discussion of the politics and social (and sometimes nostalgic) aspects that directly effects Generation Reagan / Generation-X (Those born from 1965-1981) including all the spending previous generations are doing that Gen-X and Y will end up paying for.

Freep mail me to be added or dropped. See my home page for details and previous articles.  

212 posted on 06/07/2007 8:52:51 PM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

I liked the movie but didn’t really believe in the premise back then because of MAD and nukes. I see a scenario similar to the plot of V for Vendetta as a more plausible reality using the war on Terror and War on Drugs type things to move towards fascism, but I’d replace the persecuted classes in V with Libertarians and Christians. I could see us living in a V for Vendetta type Facist Autocracy within 10 years.


213 posted on 06/08/2007 5:41:56 AM PDT by TheKidster (you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster

From this post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1846894/posts
************************
“But ambitious encroachments of the federal government, on the authority of the State governments, would not excite the opposition of a single State, or of a few States only. They would be signals of general alarm... But what degree of madness could ever drive the federal government to such an extremity.”

— James Madison (Federalist No. 46, 29 January 1788)
********************
And one of the replies included this:

“At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Buonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years. At what point, then, is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.”

- The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume I, “Address Before the Young Men’s Lyceum,of Springfield, Illinois (January 27, 1838), p. 109.


214 posted on 06/08/2007 8:08:26 AM PDT by CSM ("The rioting arsonists are the same folks who scream about global warming." LibFreeOrDie 5/7/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
"Our country is being invaded right now - the only difference is, they’re not part of an organized army, carrying weapons or riding in tanks."

Often as not a seige is successful because someone inside unlocked the gate.

215 posted on 06/08/2007 9:08:30 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Wow, my thread grew :)


216 posted on 06/08/2007 9:09:43 AM PDT by wastedyears (Check my profile for links to anti-illegal immigration T-shirts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: norton
Often as not a seige is successful because someone inside unlocked the gate.

Or has accepted the trojan horse gift, hook ,line and sinker.

217 posted on 06/08/2007 9:11:29 AM PDT by OB1kNOb ( KILL (the) BILL !! WHERE'S THE FENCE ? Vote Conservative. Vote Duncan Hunter - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Dumpster Baby
You wrote:

It would take at least 10 times the D-Day forces at Normandy to invade the US on any coast, and a handful of paratroopers dropping in to Colorado is beyond ridiculous. The only overland invasion route with a remote chance of any penetration is through Mexico, and it would take a lot more than the D-Day resources to sustain it.....

Except that the Germans had fortified every inch of coastline, stationed troops at the waters edge, and had a mobile armored reserve ready to counterattack. I think the statistic was that D Day consisted of 1 million troops in the first six days of the invasion. I think it would take far less than the ten times D Day invasion force to invade America today. Plus the Germans had no rules of engagement to speak of. Wow, can you imagine how hamstrung our troops would be today.

As an amateur historian, I think this is a fascinating tangent discussion. Let me know what you think.

218 posted on 06/08/2007 5:32:51 PM PDT by bradthebuilder (War is peace; Ignorance is strength; Freedom is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PJBankard

You wrote:

Impractical. The government has enough weapons in storage for almost every US citizen to fight back an invasion. It would also be obvious as hell that someone was to invade because of the buildup it would require, ie. movement of troops, equipment, etc.

More than once I’ve thought of loading a skid of M14’s onto the back of my truck at the local armory and heading for the hills. Sadly, I just can’t see the gubmint turning those guns loose to us peasants to fight the invaders. Thats for the army, you know.


219 posted on 06/08/2007 5:37:58 PM PDT by bradthebuilder (War is peace; Ignorance is strength; Freedom is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

You wrote:

If you’re lookin’ for a foreign enemy military, the add UN troops invited in for “pacification” and “peacekeeping.”

I am hoping for french peacekeepers in my town. Oh, the a$$ whooping they will get.


220 posted on 06/08/2007 5:40:19 PM PDT by bradthebuilder (War is peace; Ignorance is strength; Freedom is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-238 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson