Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prince Philip Proves Hes Not Smarter Than A Fifth Grader
The Stiletto ^ | May 11, 2007 | The Stiletto

Posted on 05/12/2007 6:53:15 AM PDT by theothercheek

When Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip visited Goddard Space Flight Center, they dropped in on mission control to listen to an exchange between British-born NASA astronaut C. Michael Foale and the three astronauts aboard the international space station, and later toured an exhibit with British astronaut Piers Sellers, who explained how a spacesuit's life-support system operates. The Washington Post reports that Prince Philip inquired, "What do you do about natural functions?" and "the astronaut gave a discreet answer."

Not only this is the most unoriginal question the Prince could have thought to ask, but it is rather rude as well. No one asks him or his wife about their bodily functions, so why does he think this is a proper question to ask someone else? Instead of sending a platoon of protocol advisers to our shores to teach us bumpkins how to behave, the advisors would have done better to concern themselves with how the Royal Consort – who is clearly the product of inbreeding – behaved.

NOTE: See also: "G-d Save (Us From) The Queen" (second item, The Daily Blade).


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: Maryland; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: nasa; princephillip; queenelizabeth; royalbuttkissers; royalvisit; stupiditypost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-133 next last

1 posted on 05/12/2007 6:53:18 AM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

One would think most 5th graders know the answer to this.


2 posted on 05/12/2007 6:56:42 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

This sort of tripe is not News. There is a reason we have a blogger/personal area


3 posted on 05/12/2007 6:57:32 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (If you will try being smarter, I will try being nicer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

This author would be no fun to go partying with!


4 posted on 05/12/2007 6:58:13 AM PDT by gbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

It may be “rude” but it’s the first question everyone has about spacesuits. At least he wasn’t afraid to ask.


5 posted on 05/12/2007 6:59:51 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

Ugh. The Stiletto just went down in my estimation. What a bitter, pointless rant.


6 posted on 05/12/2007 7:04:17 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

after a while all that inbreeding comes back to bite you.


7 posted on 05/12/2007 7:05:06 AM PDT by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

How about a brick?


8 posted on 05/12/2007 7:05:19 AM PDT by Tribune7 (A bleeding heart does nothing but ruin the carpet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
This sort of tripe is not News. There is a reason we have a blogger/personal area

Given the media treatment of our president, attempting to portray him as some sort of ill-mannered bumpkin in comparison to the British royal couple, I beg to differ.

Who appointed you hall monitor, MNJohnnie?

9 posted on 05/12/2007 7:05:31 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
Standard question from most anyone. I believe I've asked that myself long after I was in 5th grade. Perhaps the author needs to be more concerned that so many contestants on the current FOX show can't answer basic questions on general knowledge 5th graders should know instead of being concerned about the questions the Duke of Edinburgh asks of astronauts
10 posted on 05/12/2007 7:05:33 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

It’s the most common question asked to astronauts. They’re used to it.


11 posted on 05/12/2007 7:06:51 AM PDT by jude24 (Seen in Beijing: "Shangri-La is in you mind, but your Buffalo is not.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

Do you know how many protocol advisors the Brits sent over to prevent any of the non-royal masses the Queen and Consort were forced to mingle amongst from asking them a question like that? I never thought I’d be in a postion to defend Nancy Pelosi, but the MSM made a big deal over her uncouth “gaffe” at sticking her hand out to shake the Queen’s hand, before her “royal” high-and-mightiness had offered her had to be shaken. What BS! Pelosi acted like a friendly, forthright American over whom no mortal being is sovereign (no matter how deluded they are about their bloodline being superior to anyone else’s). I think the point of this post is that the Queen and her husband think they are better than us, and he ends up asking the most hackneyed, obvious question there is - which proves they are no better than us.


12 posted on 05/12/2007 7:07:33 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

Idiotic premise, idiotic article.

Sheesh.


13 posted on 05/12/2007 7:10:09 AM PDT by JennysCool ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears

The case of former astronaut Lisa Nowak revealed the truth about NASA’s solution for bodily functions.......Britains first-Husband apparently missed the story.


14 posted on 05/12/2007 7:11:32 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
Prince Philip inquired, "What do you do about natural functions?"

But did he wink when he asked?

15 posted on 05/12/2007 7:13:21 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

I don’t think it’s pointless at all. The point is (and the second link at the end of the post sets the context) that we fought a revolution to rid ourselves of royalty. Then when the Queen visits us, she insists on pointless standards of behavior and protocol which only apply if you are her subject. We are Americans. We bow before no one and we answer only to G-d. That’s one of the main reasons I am so very, very, very glad to be an American.


16 posted on 05/12/2007 7:13:34 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

Oh well, different stroke ...


17 posted on 05/12/2007 7:14:14 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

Why was this pointless piece of nastiness posted on FR? Who cares about an elderly foreigner’s knowlege of the space program?


18 posted on 05/12/2007 7:15:06 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They've screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, now they're here screwing up ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears

Actually, I am surprised that fifth graders are doing so well considering how coursework has become steadlily less rigorous over the years, and is steadily being replaced with liberal dogma (i.e., instead of learning astronomy, they now watch Al Gore’s movie).


19 posted on 05/12/2007 7:16:50 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

It’s not what he knows or doesn’t know. It’s the assumption that Americans are boors who need lessons in manners from advisors sent over from London - haven’t you been reading about all this in the WaPo? - and the he goes and asks a question that no one would have dared to ask HIM. Out of politeness - and maybe after being instructed by a protocol officer not to (who knows?) I guess what’s sauce for the royal gander is not sauce for the hoi-polloi masses.


20 posted on 05/12/2007 7:19:56 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Gee, I certainly hope so.


21 posted on 05/12/2007 7:21:11 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
but it is rather rude as well

Americans are such big girls blouses. If Prince Phil doesn't insult you personally, count yoursaelf ahaed of the game.

22 posted on 05/12/2007 7:22:11 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (conservatism as the fusion of libertarianism and traditionalism - John Stuart Mill and Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland

You’re a true republican (small r).


23 posted on 05/12/2007 7:22:11 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
What do you do about natural functions?"

Depends

24 posted on 05/12/2007 7:22:21 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

What offends me is the idea that - aside from the basic good manners we were taught by our parents and grandparents - we “have” to behave a certain way before the Queen (don’t speak to her unless she speaks to you, don’t shake her hand before she offers hers to be shaken, etc.) What nonsense! She is just flesh and blood just like everyone else - and if she were wearing a spacesuit, she would go to the bathroom just like any other astronaut.


25 posted on 05/12/2007 7:25:13 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Depends on what - the particular bodily function in question, or whether you’re a nutjob?


26 posted on 05/12/2007 7:26:05 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
Depends
27 posted on 05/12/2007 7:28:51 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

More pointless waste of electrons. I pay very little attention to the Wash Post. They make most of it up, so it is useless to speculate on imaginary instructions to imaginary hoi poloi. It was a logical question, asking him the same question, since he doesn’t travel in space, would be nonsensical. Now I have to leave and go polish my tiara.


28 posted on 05/12/2007 7:29:20 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They've screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, now they're here screwing up ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: billbears

And this is why they invented Google:
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/970411a.html

He could have asked one of his retinue to look it up for him - heck, he could have also asked his valet or some other aide to come up with a smarter question for him to ask.


29 posted on 05/12/2007 7:31:12 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD; theothercheek

“Why was this pointless piece of nastiness posted on FR?”

My guess is that there is at least SOME response to these “stilleto” articles frequently posted here at FR......the blog itself looks sort of barren and irrelevant, IMO. For the large number of “stilleto” postings here at FR, you’d think an FR link ought to be available on it.

(hundreds of them, more exposure here than on the blog, and no reciprocal courtesy)
http://209.157.64.201/focus/keyword?j1=and;k=thestilettoblog;p1=


30 posted on 05/12/2007 7:31:28 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Y’know - you don’t have to read this or any other Stiletto post. You can just skip to the next post. No harm, no foul.


31 posted on 05/12/2007 7:35:38 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

I dunno. He may not be an astronaut but he is an even rarer bird - someone who lives in a country that believes his wife and his family are soverign over them. Relatively few people on the planet can claim that kind of power/position over others (not even the leader of the free world, who can get replaced every four or eight years). What makes him “royal”? Maybe he doesn’t even go to the bathroom at all? Tiara polishing can be tedious - lots of nooks and crannies - so this’ll give you something to think about.


32 posted on 05/12/2007 7:39:29 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

I assume THAT means you don’t want to place an FR link on your blog, and that you will continue to spam the blog content here as often as you have been?


33 posted on 05/12/2007 7:41:12 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
Oh, nonsense. Your inferiority complex is showing.

You must not know much about Britain if you think the Queen (much less her consort) has any sovereign power over anybody.

While she still technically has the power to "counsel, advise, warn" as (I believe) Bagehot said, the Queen has no role in government other than as a figurehead and rallying point. Which she does very well. She gives up a lot (most notably her privacy) and she handles it all quite graciously.

Which is more than I can say for this venomous screed.

Prince Philip is notorious for speaking his mind, which I find somewhat endearing. Glad I'm not a Briton, I wouldn't "glory in the name", but GB is a longstanding and faithful ally. A lot of water has gone under the bridge since Yorktown, the burning of Washington, and the Battle of New Orleans. . . . and if anybody was holding a grudge I'd have as good a right as any, with four Revolutionary Ancestors.

34 posted on 05/12/2007 7:50:42 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Spam? Lots of people read and enjoy these posts - maybe not this one (had no idea that FRs were so into royalty and all its trappings). I have seen references to FR discussions on The Stiletto - especially when someone points out a factual error, she always says whether it was a Freeper, another reader, etc. who brought it to her attention. But if you think it’s important for her blogroll to include a link to FR, then I’m sure she’d be happy to. No reason not to, right?


35 posted on 05/12/2007 7:52:10 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

most fifth graders do.


36 posted on 05/12/2007 7:52:36 AM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

The blogger is a megalomanic. The blog is really awful, derivative, smug, half-baked stuff, not worth our electrons.


37 posted on 05/12/2007 7:52:49 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They've screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, now they're here screwing up ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

I don’t feel inferior to anyone, but I do resent the implication of inferiority evidenced by all those protocols one has to observe when in the presence of someone who is in no way superior to any of us. Good manners - yes, of course. Worrying about how long to wait before it is “safe” to shake the Queen’s hand? Rubbish.


38 posted on 05/12/2007 7:56:03 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek; 3AngelaD

“Spam? Lots of people read..........”

Of course they do.....thats the whole point! You object to me calling it what it is, when it was YOU who made this particular post with the added piggyback of hoping that FR readers would click BOTH “stilleto” links you included, thereby doubling the potential hits on the “stilleto” blogsite with the google ads?

Lets just call it what it is, OK? The least you could and SHOULD do is place a FreeRepublic link prominently on your blog......BECAUSE IT’S THE DECENT THING TO DO! The one-way street you have benefited from sucks.


39 posted on 05/12/2007 8:01:35 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

o.k. I’m not a fifth grader - can someone give me the answer? Thanks. (I’m 73 yrs. old)


40 posted on 05/12/2007 8:03:10 AM PDT by LET LOOSE THE DOGS OF WAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

I am wondering if when Paul Jacob posted this commentary on Townhall.com - The Queen of England makes me sick - everyone got their shorts all in a knot:
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/PaulJacob/2007/05/06/the_queen_of_england_makes_me_sick

There’s lots of things on FR that I skip over because I disagree or the topic doesn’t interest me - the stuff people ping me is more likely to get my attention because the topics interest me. The thing is, there are thousands of posts on FR every day and no one could ever hope to read all of them, whether they agree or disagree with one or more posts. From the blurb you pretty much knew what the post was about and probably should have skipped it because reading and commenting on it is obviously a waste of your time.


41 posted on 05/12/2007 8:06:02 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: LET LOOSE THE DOGS OF WAR

Check out the NASA link I posted in response to someone else on the thread.


42 posted on 05/12/2007 8:07:00 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

I only included the link to the second article because I thought this post needed the additional context. Again, I cannot control whether (a) you or anyone else reads anything I post and (b) whether you or anyone else clicks on the links within the items I post (in fact, until a Freeper explained to me how to imbed the links in my post, I was just telling people to go to the original source if they felt like clicking the WaPo or other article that was quoted). As for Google ads, my understanding is that if an ad isn’t clicked on (and I don’t think anyone can force you or anyone else to click on those ads) no one makes any money (each click is worth a fraction of a cent).

Bottom line: no one is forcing you to do anything you don’t want to do.

However, I do agree that since some of the items I have posted from The Stiletto generated a respectable number of views on FR - plus lots of comments - that there should be a reciprocal link to FR. I totally disagree with you on the amount of “respect” to accord “royalty” - no more and no less than any other human being, IMO - but I do agree with you on this.


43 posted on 05/12/2007 8:18:49 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: LET LOOSE THE DOGS OF WAR

You’re a sweet young thing, compared to Prince Philip!


44 posted on 05/12/2007 8:25:35 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Death is perishable. Faith is eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

Also, that’s probably the most dignified version of that particular question I’ve ever heard. :p


45 posted on 05/12/2007 8:27:15 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

That’s assuming that the protocol advisor didn’t edit the WaPo quote before it got pulished ...


46 posted on 05/12/2007 8:29:02 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

That’s assuming that the protocol advisor didn’t edit the WaPo quote before it got published ...


47 posted on 05/12/2007 8:29:17 AM PDT by theothercheek ("Unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything." - U.S. Senate Chaplain Peter Marshall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Apparently a large number of people here care enough about these morons to defend them against any real or imagined slight.

Who cares about an elderly foreigner’s knowlege of the space program?

48 posted on 05/12/2007 8:29:35 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
If not, here is a book for his perusal, written for fifth graders.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B000P9T23C/ref=sr_1_olp_1/104-1708473-0205541?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1178983845&sr=8-1

49 posted on 05/12/2007 8:32:48 AM PDT by jmcenanly (If crime fighters fight crime, and fire fighters fight fires, then freedom fighters ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

why don’t you just stop beating around the distraction bush and PUT UP A FreeRepublic link on your “blog”, since you “agree with” me.


50 posted on 05/12/2007 8:35:25 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson