Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brazil's Indians offended by Pope comments
Reuters ^ | May 14, 2007 | Raymond Colitt

Posted on 05/15/2007 6:15:58 AM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: NYer
Priests blessed conquistadors as they waged war on the indigenous peoples, although some later defended them and many today are the most vociferous allies of Indians.

I didn't realize there were still conquistadors around today!

I'm really tired of the semi-literate making a living spouting political propaganda that barely passes for writing!

41 posted on 05/15/2007 1:48:03 PM PDT by GatorGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Priests blessed conquistadors as they waged war on the indigenous peoples, although some later defended them and many today are the most vociferous allies of Indians.

I didn't realize there were still conquistadors around today!

I'm really tired of the semi-literate making a living spouting political propaganda that barely passes for writing!

42 posted on 05/15/2007 1:48:08 PM PDT by GatorGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This Pope angers all the right people, I like him!


43 posted on 05/15/2007 1:49:09 PM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Mary is the source of our joy primarily because of her “Yes” to God, and her subsequent bearing of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ into the world.

Is it so difficult to see that when we have a tender affection for Mary, we give glory to God's Wisdom and Mercy for His method of entering time and the human condition? Let us not despise His chosen Ark of the Covenant!

44 posted on 05/15/2007 1:56:34 PM PDT by Lauren BaRecall (RINOs for Juan and Evita Giuliani! Campaign song: "Don't Cry For Me New York City.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; wideawake

The neopagans are making a comeback in Europe as well. What else explains their obsession with “nature” and “global warming.” Its a return to the Germanic custom of “venerating mother earth.”


45 posted on 05/15/2007 1:58:56 PM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Ah, now I see where you’re getting the numbers from.

I’m not sure where Sandoz gets his numbers or how reliable his research is, but as I haven’t seen his work I don’t feel qualified to comment on that. It does, however, look out of bounds with population fluctuations in the missions in the East (Caughnawaga, Akwesasne, Oka, Odanak).

What is cited as the putative cause of the mortality, anyway?


46 posted on 05/15/2007 2:23:58 PM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Claud
What is cited as the putative cause of the mortality, anyway?

The high mortality rate came from complex mix of demoralization, forced labor, poor food and living conditions, followed by introduced diseases. All of these effected both the death rate and the birth rate.

Jackson's (1994) Indian Population Decline gives a good list of the major epidemics as his Appendix 1: smallpox, influenza, dysentery, measles, typhus, and Asian cholera. Jackson's list omits gonorrhea and syphilis, "consumption" (tuberculosis), diphtheria, pneumonia and other respiratory diseases, as they did not spread as epidemics.

Steve Hackel (2005:114) notes that at Mission San Carlos diphtheria and pneumonia killed 11% of the Indians in 1802, and measles killed 13% of the Indians in 1806. At Mission La Purisima measles killed 150 Indians about July of 1806.

Hackel also notes that smallpox reached California late, so it was not as significant as it was elsewhere.

47 posted on 05/15/2007 3:15:49 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: adiaireton8

I was baptised because my parents caried me into church. I believe you can be a 100% christian without the rituals, it’s just symbols. But baptism is a nice ritual, which gives meaning to persons, and that is a good thing, but what we believe and how we treat our next is what matters. You can even be a good christian without reading the bible, methinks.

Bless you!


48 posted on 05/15/2007 5:14:42 PM PDT by Kurt_Hectic (Trust only what you see, not what you hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Lauren BaRecall

He he I’m sorry, but you got me there! Ouch that sounds like work to me! I regretted imediately that I posted my comment, because I didn’t mean to offend any Catholics, the Pope is surely a good old guy, but I don’t feel that he (nor the rest of the church, Catholic, Protestant or else) is necessary for a free man or woman to maintain his/her relationship to Mr. G and J.C.


49 posted on 05/15/2007 5:20:36 PM PDT by Kurt_Hectic (Trust only what you see, not what you hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Claud
The Iriquois population was fairly stable until a really nasty winter ~ 1648 I believe it was. They began impressing Mingo (non Confederation Iriquois) into their warrior societies as "fill ins".

The Mingo suffered slightly greater than a 95% death rate though, so this didn't give the Iriquois enough warriors, or supporters, to keep large armies in the field as had previously been the case.

Francis Parkman covers this pretty well working with primary documents.

The Eastern tribes were broken in the Mid-1600s. They then turned to the more settled occupation of hunting game for sale. Whites and Africans could then move into this area without much trouble from the Indians.

The die was cast!

50 posted on 05/15/2007 6:32:51 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl
One of my closer relatives from that time period (as "closeness" goes) was a Conquistidore ~ one of the last ones in fact. Turned out the King in Spain didn't like what he was up to and sent in a New Governor to depose him.

They ended up putting him on trial and condemning him to be drawn, quartered, and his parts tossed to the dogs in the fields. He refused last rites (or whatever it was called at the time) from a priest.

The priests weren't always standing behind the Conquistidores.

51 posted on 05/15/2007 6:40:33 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
http://discovermagazine.com/1992/oct/thearrowofdiseas137 is a good reference article for the start of new research into what diseases were killing off the Indians and how many of them died.

There were hardly enough Spaniards in the New World to kill all the Indians even if they stood shoulder to shoulder chopping them down with swords as the Indians marched in naked ranks right to the point of their murder.

The latest evaluation of the diseases points to viruses native to North America ~ hanta virus for one.

52 posted on 05/15/2007 6:44:47 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Kurt_Hectic
Nah, no offense taken! :o)

He he I’m sorry, but you got me there! Ouch that sounds like work to me!

Yes, I admit that it *is* work. Gosh, I wonder what you'd do if Jesus ever called you to be a martyr! I mean absolutely no offense in saying that...it's just that the Pope, and all those people who go to church at least once a week for the rest of their lives are actually doing something in a committed way.

I really wanted to see you rise to the challenge, and what the heck, it's only for a month. Well, my challenge still stands 'cause I'm not taking it back! :o)

53 posted on 05/15/2007 7:12:42 PM PDT by Lauren BaRecall (RINOs for Juan and Evita Giuliani! Campaign song: "Don't Cry For Me New York City.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Your link was a good one. I had not seen that article. One passage was particularly interesting:

However, archeological excavations and descriptions left by the first European explorers on our coasts now suggest an initial number of around 20 million. In the century or two following Columbus’s arrival in the New World, the Indian population is estimated to have declined by about 95 percent.

Two questions.

You mentioned the hanta virus. I did a google and one of the items I found was:

The hantavirus illness was believed to have been first identified in South Korea.

Do you have link to articles showing it as a problem in early Indian populations?

Secondly, the figure of 95% population decline for the century or two after Columbus--was that primarily the eastern US?

I have seen evidence for a population decline in the western US prior to Spanish colonization (1769), but it is not anywhere near as large as 95%. Did some diseases migrate north from Spanish Mexico (along with the horse)?

Any links would be appreciated.

54 posted on 05/15/2007 7:15:47 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Kurt_Hectic
Why then even go to church?

-A8

55 posted on 05/15/2007 7:30:37 PM PDT by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
Hanta virus was simply identified first in Korea. It existed elsewhere. Viruses do get around.

Population estimates for the Americas have changed quite a bit since that Discover article was first published. Now that they have a better idea of what was going on in the Amazon basin it's pretty easy to imagine more than one hundred million people.

Recently an English climatologist came up with the thesis that it was the death of the Indians that resulted in the temperature drop of the late 1500/early 1600 period.

All those millions of Indians were using farming techniques that produced vast quantities of greenhouse gases that kept Earth warm. Otherwise an Ice Age would have happened on schedule.

The climatologist says that in a couple of hundred years after we've run out of fossil fuels (coal, oil, gas) the skies will clear, it will turn very cold, and the ice will come back so fast it destroys civilization.

56 posted on 05/15/2007 7:34:02 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Claud

excellent post . Most US schools preach ONLY anti white/European history . Right down to the grammar schools it is what’s taught. You cannot believe what most kids ( and younger teachers ) believe as far as history goes.


57 posted on 05/15/2007 7:40:52 PM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Hanta virus was simply identified first in Korea. It existed elsewhere. Viruses do get around.

OK. I will research it.


Population estimates for the Americas have changed quite a bit since that Discover article was first published. Now that they have a better idea of what was going on in the Amazon basin it's pretty easy to imagine more than one hundred million people.

Recently an English climatologist came up with the thesis that it was the death of the Indians that resulted in the temperature drop of the late 1500/early 1600 period.

All those millions of Indians were using farming techniques that produced vast quantities of greenhouse gases that kept Earth warm. Otherwise an Ice Age would have happened on schedule.

Links or references please? I have not run into this information before, and would like to follow up.

58 posted on 05/15/2007 7:45:21 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Again, a Discover article.http://www.nyas.org/ebrief/miniEB.asp?ebriefID=524


59 posted on 05/15/2007 7:59:57 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
Steve Hackel (2005:114) notes that at Mission San Carlos diphtheria and pneumonia killed 11% of the Indians in 1802, and measles killed 13% of the Indians in 1806. At Mission La Purisima measles killed 150 Indians about July of 1806.

I believe yellow fever killed about 10% of the population of Philadelphia in 1793. So comparable numbers there.

I noticed that you mentioned forced labor and demoralization first though, and then "followed by" introduced diseases. But I'd think it was the diseases that were the primary cause of death. Forced labor and demoralization usually don't lead to immediate death, unless you're talking death camps...and I don't think you can charge the Fransciscan Fathers with that kind of cruelty.

60 posted on 05/16/2007 5:37:59 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson