The Democrat Party is beyond corrupt, It's also evil.

Free Republic thread ^ | May 16, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

Here's an interesting old post from several years ago where I was promoting the Republican party over the Democrat party because the Democrat party was not only thoroughly corrupt, but evil as well. And the evil I was referring to was primarily due to its official party support for government sanctioned wholesale slaughter of innocent and helpless life in the womb: abortion. So now if Giuliani becomes the head of the Republican party and abortion becomes the official policy of the Republican party, does the Republican party also wear the mantle of "evil?" How do we keep this evilness out of government if both major parties support abortion? And I have to ask as did my political foes of old, if both parties support abortion, feminism, homosexualism, hate crimes/thought crimes legislation, gun control, illegal immigration, etc, what's the difference?

The Democrat Party is beyond corrupt, It's also evil.

09/21/2002

And what is this evil that triumphs when good men do nothing? What are we really talking about here and is it worth fighting for? Is it worth turning our heads and allowing evil to continue on while we do nothing? (and I count voting for a third party candidate when knowing that he has absolutely no chance of defeating the Democrat, and worse, actually planning and hoping to knock out the Republican candidate who otherwise might have defeated the Democrat, as doing nothing).

Corruption is accepting campaign cash from the Chinese in exchange for military hardware. Corruption is accepting campaign cash as bribes from Indonesian power brokers, from Buddhist Monks, from corrupt corporate moguls. Corruption is defined by the myriad criminal acts and practices of the Clintons and the Gores and their corrupt Democrat minions.

Corruption is the land grabs, the power grabs, the gun grabs, the bribery, the shady deals, the high crimes and treason. Corruption is the theft of campaign dollars through forced labor union deductions. Corruption is the systematic indoctrination of several generations of our youth with socialist dogma via government school systems. Corruption is the removal of God from public life and substituting in the evil homosexual/feminist agenda and the destruction of moral society. Corruption is lying to the public about global warming and the selling of the Kyoto treaty. Corruption is giving up our national sovereignty to the United Nations. Corruption is the abuses of office, obstruction of justice, lying, perjury and subornation of perjury.

The Democrat Party is thoroughly corrupt. There is no question about that, but it's way beyond corrupt. It's also evil.

Waco was evil. The killing of innocent men, women, children and babies is evil. Torturing them for weeks on end, gassing them, and then burning them alive is pure evil. This was perpetrated by a corrupt and evil Democrat Administration and covered-up by corrupt and evil Democrat Congressmen and Senators, many of whom you are saying should be allowed to remain in office even today.

And as bad as that is, it pales in comparison to the Democrat government sanctioned and funded wholesale slaughter of the most innocent life of all, the murder of innocent human life in the womb. This is evil. Pure evil. And this evilness is openly perpetrated by a thoroughly corrupt and evil Democrat Party. The same corrupt and evil Democrat Congress and Judiciary whom you are now saying deserve to remain in office.

IMHO, allowing these Democrats to remain in power is aiding and abetting the corruption and treason, and is acting as an accessory before and after the fact to the murderers of innocent human life. Is doing nothing and allowing this evil to triumph evil itself?

I love my country. I love the Constitution. I love life. I love God. I know that the Democrats hate my country, hate the Constitution, hate God and hate human life. I see that the only Party capable of blocking and defeating the evil Democrats is the Republican Party. I see that many races are so close that as little as a one percent siphon of conservative votes to a third party could be the difference between success and failure. I see allowing a Democrat to remain in power when it could have been prevented as a triumph of evil.

Jim Robinson

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/754882/posts

[little jeremiah]

BTTT.

[ellery]

I agree with you that Giuliani would not immediately cause the GOP to adopt anti-Constitutional positions such as Roe, gun-grabbing, etc. as its official policy. However, a winning Giuliani candidacy certainly would cause the GOP to adopt his stances as their de facto policies. Generals tend to fight the last battles. If gun grabbing, etc. can win the GOP the presidency, why would it ever go back to the Constitutional stance (regardless of what the official platform says)?

[ellery]

I don’t believe he has said he would appoint a “Conservative” judge (I welcome links to the contrary if I’m misinformed). What he’s said consistently is that he would appoint “strict constructionists.” Sounds great, right? Except that he’s then flipped, and flopped, and flipped about what exactly a strict constructionist is. His latest stance is that a strict constructionist certainly can uphold Roe on precedent. That is the opposite of what a strict constructionist, aka originalist does. A strict constructionist focuses on the strict construction of the Constitution and the Founding Documents, and what the founders meant by what they wrote therein. If it’s not in the Constitution, a strict constructionist won’t uphold it, no matter what the precedent says.

So, Giuliani has attempted to leave the impression that he means to appoint conservative judges, while actually saying that he will do whatever he d*mn well pleases (I won’t even get into his deplorable ignorance about how the Constitution works, and thus is absolute inability to identify an actual strict constructionist even if he wanted to appoint one).

You have to pay attention to the fine print with this guy, unfortunately. He’s slick.

[rbosque]

Evil is it's own destruction.

[Lancey Howard]

BUMP!

[Mensius]

The whole of the Democrat party is a party of death. Abortion, euthanasia, socialism promoting the death the soul, propagating victimhood to kill peoples will.

[Brandie]

This is great!

[doug from upland]

I had been worried about Tom Tancredo making a third party run. He said this morning on a show that he would not do that.

[Search4Truth]

The truth bodly stated. God bless you.

[Rudder]

...cause the GOP to adopt his stances as their de facto policies.

Rudy stances are not so-con's, that's clear. But, at the same time, the GOP is not going tread into dangerous waters by endorsing gun-control or abortion. Rudy, and all other candidates, know(s) this. Whoever gets elected as the GOP President in 2008 will not mention these issues while in office. There's no need to, not much that a sitting Pres. can do and the WOT will be all-consuming by then.

[doug from upland]

MIDI - SOUND OF SILENCE

Hello patriots, my friends…I have some bad news once again
You can see what they've been doing...our great nation they've been screwing

There’s a lesson, we cannot trust the Democrats…sewer rats
We hear the sounds of treason

They'll always sell our country out…of that, you shouldn't have a doubt
Always abdicating freedom…it’s in writing, you should read ‘em

There’s a lesson that we can't trust the Democrats…sewer rats
We hear the sounds of treason

Their hatred of the USA…they're displaying everyday
They disdain our Constitution…it is time for retribution

The lesson is we cannot trust the Democrats…sewer rats
We hear the sounds of treason

It's total power they must gain...it is a plan that is insane
If a Dem is not the president, they hope that we fail, it's evident

With our defense, we cannot trust the Democrats, sewer rats
We hear the sounds of treason

They want rule by the U.N…they are very evil men
Socialism's the ideal…that's the way the leftists feel

The lesson is we cannot trust Democrats…sewer rats
We hear the sounds of treason

[Rudder]

...cause the GOP to adopt his stances as their de facto policies.

Rudy stances are not so-con's, that's clear. But, at the same time, the GOP is not going tread into dangerous waters by endorsing gun-control or abortion. Rudy, and all other candidates, know(s) this. Whoever gets elected as the GOP President in 2008 will not mention these issues while in office. There's no need to, not much that a sitting Pres. can do and the WOT will be all-consuming by then.

[Jim Robinson]

"Rudy stances are not so-con's conservative, that's clear."

Fixed your oversight.

[Rudder]

Hah!

You're correct.

[Just mythoughts]

Given what has become acceptable under the anti-God public school system these days, I am not sure there are enough voters not seduced into a self-centered all about me stupor.

There is nothing fiscally conservative about social liberalism, our children have been so sexually educated they know darn well what causes pregnancies and yet these high minded elitists squeal like stuck pigs when abstinence is suggested. Abstinence is treated as though it goes against the natural order of humanity.

Then we have at the top of all humanity the intellectual educated welfare elite deemed themselves the ‘fittest’ to survive via the tax payer dollar. These of academia could care less about anything else but maintaining their life’s work off their government funded grant system. We have children slaughtering each other on the streets of our cities, just surviving like primates.

[avacado]

I don’t believe he has said he would appoint a “Conservative” judge (I welcome links to the contrary if I’m misinformed). What he’s said consistently is that he would appoint “strict constructionists.”

You're right. I stand corrected.

[mathluv]

'(and I count voting for a third party candidate when knowing that he has absolutely no chance of defeating the Democrat, and worse, actually planning and hoping to knock out the Republican candidate who otherwise might have defeated the Democrat, as doing nothing).'

Needs repeating, many times!

[mathluv]

'(and I count voting for a third party candidate when knowing that he has absolutely no chance of defeating the Democrat, and worse, actually planning and hoping to knock out the Republican candidate who otherwise might have defeated the Democrat, as doing nothing).'

Needs repeating, many times!

[mathluv]

Rudy is my next-to-last choice (McCain is my last). We know he is a social liberal, and we oppose that. But do you really think a dim in the WH will be better? Oppose him now, so that he does not get the nomination.

[OB1kNOb]

And here's the REAL Doctor Evil behind their plan.