To: monomaniac
I have always been strictly pro life but faced with this kind a tragic freak of nature, I’d be in a quandary.
2 posted on
05/20/2007 11:12:29 PM PDT by
Ditter
To: monomaniac
Anybody get GOD`S opinion?
3 posted on
05/20/2007 11:16:49 PM PDT by
neverhillorat
(HILLORAT WINS, WE ALL LOSE)
To: monomaniac
5 posted on
05/20/2007 11:25:05 PM PDT by
TightyRighty
(July 21, 2007 - The End Is Near)
To: monomaniac
This is liberal compassion? Death?
11 posted on
05/20/2007 11:54:54 PM PDT by
rbosque
(L)
To: wagglebee
12 posted on
05/21/2007 12:06:41 AM PDT by
LilAngel
(No blood for ingrates)
To: monomaniac
This is the result of two things:
1.) Denial or refusal of the meaning of the original Hippocratic Oath.
2.) A prideful (sorry for the archaic term, but that is what it is) response to the fact that sometimes humans are not in control - rather than deal with the uncertainty, this guy "gets rid" of the problem.
14 posted on
05/21/2007 12:16:03 AM PDT by
ikka
To: monomaniac
I don’t believe we should decide which lives are worth living. God has a purpose for each life that he creates. Their life situation may not be ideal, but they should not be killed because of it.
16 posted on
05/21/2007 12:51:10 AM PDT by
Pinkbell
(Hunter/Thompson)
To: monomaniac; 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
23 posted on
05/21/2007 5:52:27 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Pro-Life PING Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
30 posted on
05/21/2007 6:27:17 AM PDT by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
To: monomaniac
Weren’t there other conjoined twins that lived pretty normal lives? I remember two who were well known and are adults.
To: monomaniac
Isn’t it funny how they are ‘pro-choice’ except when your choice disagrees with what they think you should do?
39 posted on
05/21/2007 12:09:04 PM PDT by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: monomaniac; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...
41 posted on
05/21/2007 8:33:13 PM PDT by
Coleus
(Woe unto him that call evil good and good evil"-- Isaiah 5:20-21)
To: monomaniac
His medical license should be revoked.
42 posted on
05/21/2007 8:34:48 PM PDT by
unspun
(What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
To: monomaniac; wagglebee
43 posted on
05/22/2007 3:49:11 AM PDT by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: monomaniac
Knowing one of the doctors involved, the case that comes to mind for me is
Mohamed and Ahmed Ibrahim The surgeons studied the operation for months, yet it ran into so many unexpected complications that the surgery took an astonishing 34 hours. But it worked! As I understood it from my friend, all of this effort was donated by the medical facilities, the doctors, nurses and other medics. This web site relates,
The numbers alone tell a story. The surgery required more than 50 personnel, including:
* 5 neurosurgeons
* 2 plastic surgeons
* 1 pediatric general surgeon
* 1 oral surgeon
* 9 anesthesiologists
* 4 anesthesia technicians
* 6 pediatric nurses
* 4 respiratory therapists and
* 6 surgical technologists.
It was charity and yet it was medical pioneering in which much was learned for future cases. Perhaps the doctor in Canada could have learned something from it too. At least he could have found reason to soften his hard heart.
44 posted on
05/22/2007 5:30:17 AM PDT by
T'wit
(Confidence in science rests on belief in God's order and will not long survive loss of belief.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson