Posted on 05/30/2007 9:07:18 AM PDT by processing please hold
There is an extraordinary parallelism between Humanists and Marxists. Among the more obvious are:
* rejection of traditional Christianity and religion
* the necessity for subordination of the individual to state and the community
* catchwords of both Humanism and Marxism are "democracy, peace and high standard of living"
* individual rights and beliefs are non-existent
* collectivism is supreme.
(Excerpt) Read more at augustreview.com ...
Hillary supported Edward Ned Lamont against Lieberman, and IIRC, she also help raise money for him.
Please read the entire article before posting.
You will see the ACLU in this article as well.
[snip]
When one talks about a "New World Religion", a similar analytical approach is necessary. While those in the global religious movement are quick to discuss global political governance issues, those in the global economic and/or global political world more often side-step religious questions as being "private issues", and simply deny any goals of bringing about a unified, global religion of any sort.
As we examine this subject, one cannot help but note how the American court system is fanatically removing every semblance of Judeo-Christian symbolism from public places using the argument of "Separation of Church and State." In spite of the fact that America's heritage is deeply rooted in simple concepts like the Ten Commandments, these are now persona non grata. To the global elite however, there apparently is no "separation of church and state"... as long as it is their religion and their state: Neither of these welcome traditional evangelical Christianity.
The first example of religion in globalism is the Aspen Institute, formerly called the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies. Aspen is chosen because it is established, influential, substantive and very representative. There are many other organizations that comprise a loose network of common interests, but it is not necessary or possible to discuss each one.
IOW... they are conjoined philosophical/ideological twins..
Paving the way for what? Atheism? Or Islamofascism? Never forget, come what may, Almight God is in control.
Some of our poloticians, the movers and shakers as well. Those who believe in the NWO, and no borders are part of that group.
Not if they get their way and they are. Humanism will be their religion.
I think the Bolsheviks are similar to the current democrat party and the way things are going, the Mensheviks are current republican party.
I agree.
>Not if they get their way and they are. Humanism will be their religion.<
I was speaking to Christians when I said, “Never forget, come what may, Almighty God is in control”. We must never forget that our Almighty God is with us every inch of the way. He is ever faithful to us. Can we be less than ever faithful to Him?
mark
What makes these "Humanist" movements dangerous is not their disbelief in "supernatural intervention". It's their belief that with enough intellect, money and power man can defy not only the Judeo-Christian God but can defy even the basic laws of nature. E.g., they believe that central planning can substitute for market systems, human nature can be changed by decree, the Law of Unintended Consequences does not exist, etc.
There you have it. In researching the Federal Reserve, many of the same names keep popping up. I started looking at the names and who they were. Those who believe in humanism also control(for want of a better word) the Federal Reserve.
>E.g. they believe that central planning can substitute for market systems, human nature can be changed by decree, the Law of Unintended Consequences does not exist, etc.<
A very apt description of Globalism. Satan is alive and well.
What underlies the whole world-view is: THERE IS NOT AN OBJECTIVE TRUTH; no source of truth, stability, but what man makes it!
The Fed is my Bane!
bump
I recommend you read the Humanist Manifesto (I & II)...
First, see how it stacks up against the tenets of classic Marxism and the Communist Manifesto.
It's an "eye-opener" of a comparison...
Second --conduct an intellectually honest self-examination & check your own spiritual/moral convictions...
Especially concerning the "basic goodness of humankind"...
And the ultimate ability of mankind to affect his ultimate destiny...
In other words, the inferred expectations that mankind will somehow -- in the final analysis-- "save" themselves...
Have a great day...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.