Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Union Strike May Affect Next NASA Space Shuttle Launch
SpaceRef.com ^ | June 2, 2007 | Keith Cowing

Posted on 06/02/2007 11:45:27 PM PDT by anymouse

The local chapter of International Association of Machinist and Aerospace Workers representing employees in the NASA KSC area has rejected an offer from United Space Alliance. There is a 5 day cooling off period now in effect during which both sides will try and work out their differences.

Should no agreement be reached the employees could go on strike - perhaps as early as 9 June. The next shuttle mission is scheduled to launch on 8 June.

No word yet as to whether this threat of a strike will affect launch preparations for STS-117.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Technical; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: nasa; space; strike; union
It looks like a launch delay is likely.
1 posted on 06/02/2007 11:45:31 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis; Shuttle Shucker

space ping


2 posted on 06/02/2007 11:46:01 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Outsource it to China.
N.A.S.A. seems paralyzed like so many very large government institutions.


3 posted on 06/03/2007 3:10:31 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

a poster reason why...government unions are another nail in the coffin of the USA!!!!

Reagan had the right idea...vis a vis ~ PATCO!!!!


4 posted on 06/03/2007 5:25:54 AM PDT by nyyankeefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

This news report would seem to contradict that-—

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/custom/space/orl-mshuttstrike0307jun03,0,6283726.story?coll=orl-news-headlines-space


5 posted on 06/03/2007 5:30:55 AM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Student; Shadowstrike; Paul Ross; RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; ...
I hate Unions...


6 posted on 06/03/2007 9:25:29 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Mitt Romney 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Bada Ping!


7 posted on 06/03/2007 9:28:40 AM PDT by Young Werther ( and Julius Ceasar said, "quae cum ita sunt." (or since these things are so!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

United Space Alliance sounds like a sci-fi invention.


8 posted on 06/03/2007 9:52:54 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated May 31, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
A work of convenient fiction, that is for sure. USA was formed (with NASAs blessing) to shield it’s shareholders, Boeing and Lockheed Martin from liability in case USA should be found liable in a shuttle accident/crash. Columbia tested that theory and the scam apparently worked.
9 posted on 06/03/2007 2:18:58 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
A work of convenient fiction, that is for sure. USA was formed (with NASAs blessing) to shield it’s shareholders, Boeing and Lockheed Martin from liability in case USA should be found liable in a shuttle accident/crash. Columbia tested that theory and the scam apparently worked.

Huh? It's not like the United Space Alliance partners really were responsible anyways...the orbiter is a NASA design. NASA made the call on not having a survivable escape module that can eject safely from a disintegrating launch or re-entry vehicle. They decided it cost too much weight.

NASA also made the call on not having protective "fairings" covering the delicate carbon-carbon leading edges. So far as I know, they didn't even explicitly justify their negligence.

The launch of Discovery with its numerous cameras surveilling the surface right up and through External tank seperation...showed that despite the most-recent-"fixes" launches still are generating a heck of a lot of dangerous debris. Debris effectively ignored until Columbia's catastrophe....

The post-Columbia "fixes" only slightly moderated the problem...

But fairings at least would address this sufficiently to solve the debris safety issue. More effective than the individual flake-source "band-aid" approach. So we don't have to lose another wonderful crew...


10 posted on 06/04/2007 1:03:28 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
It looks like a launch delay is likely.

How many launches might be impacted?

11 posted on 06/04/2007 1:04:15 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Another strike? There was just some kind of strike 18 months ago, one that almost impacted the New Horizons launch. I had to pass the protesters as I entered the Cape to do instrument tests on the spacecraft...


12 posted on 06/07/2007 10:12:05 PM PDT by MikeD (We live in a world where babies are like velveteen rabbits that only become real if they are loved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson