1 posted on
06/06/2007 12:31:13 PM PDT by
ZGuy
To: neverdem; Coleus
2 posted on
06/06/2007 12:32:32 PM PDT by
ZGuy
(Democrats : Corrupt or deceived. There are no other options.)
To: ZGuy
scientists at MIT have chemically reprogrammed regular adult cells (like skin cells) in mice There are a lot of things that can be done with mouse cells that don't transfer to human cells. I'll withold judgement until they can demonstrate the transfer.
3 posted on
06/06/2007 12:33:34 PM PDT by
r9etb
To: ZGuy
If it means they don’t have to destroy babies, the Dems won’t accept it.
4 posted on
06/06/2007 12:34:32 PM PDT by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: ZGuy
This will mean nothing to the liberals. They will continue to cling to embryo destruction as a validation of their abortion views. This is an issue that will continue to cause rancor and debate, regardless of what science reveals. They will never let go.
5 posted on
06/06/2007 12:36:05 PM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(When toilet paper is a luxury, you have achieved communism.)
To: ZGuy
The embryonic stem cell debate was bogus from the beginning. There are many ways to obtain undifferentiated cells. Killing a fetus is just one of them.
The real agenda was to give abortion a false aura of necessity.
7 posted on
06/06/2007 12:45:22 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder." --Frederic Bastiat)
To: ZGuy
If true, this is great news!
8 posted on
06/06/2007 12:47:18 PM PDT by
TheDon
(The DemocRAT party is the party of TREASON! Overthrow the terrorist's congress!)
To: ZGuy
Any scientific discovery, if used properly, is good news.
But this won’t make a pin’s worth of difference, because the proponents of fetal stem cell research WANT and NEED to kill babies. That’s the whole point. That’s why they insist on fetal stem cells and only fetal stem cells.
Their reasons are obvious.
12 posted on
06/06/2007 1:54:10 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: ZGuy
They express their results with simplicity and confidence: Our results establish that somatic cells [i.e. normal adult non-reproductive cells] can be reprogrammed to a pluripotent state that is similar, if not identical, to that of normal embryonic stem cells. They note further, our results show that the biological potency and epigenetic state of in-vitro-reprogrammed induced pluripotent stem cells are indistinguishable from those of embryonic stem cells. Hey guys -- Thanks for the simplicity. I'm sure glad you didn't go for the complicated description. :=)
13 posted on
06/06/2007 2:03:36 PM PDT by
Bob
To: ZGuy
Actually stem cells can be created from our own blood. They are doing it now in Israel for the past several years, using your own cells to help congestive heart failure patients rebuild their hearts with their own cells.
The cells are harvested from your own blood, reduced and refined to provide only stem cells. Then injected directly into the heart to rebuild it. I’ve seen several men who have and the procedure done overseas and it is amazing.
Current studies are underway with at the Cleveland Clinic and a heart institute in Houston. A government grant has been give the Cleveland Clinic to start research on qualified CHF patients in September of this year.
16 posted on
06/06/2007 2:35:42 PM PDT by
not2worry
( What goes around comes around!)
To: ZGuy; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
20 posted on
06/06/2007 8:11:48 PM PDT by
Coleus
(Woe unto him that call evil good and good evil"-- Isaiah 5:20-21)
To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Pro-Life PING Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
21 posted on
06/06/2007 8:38:51 PM PDT by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
24 posted on
06/07/2007 8:21:14 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated May 31, 2007.)
To: ZGuy
it was a “timing” issue....they tried to pull stuff off under the radar, so to speak!! nothing like bringing a bill up for an immediate vote and not giving those voting on it a chance to read it through and understand it. underhanded? yes! true to form of the OTHER side? yes!
25 posted on
06/07/2007 5:18:56 PM PDT by
MountainFlower
(There but by the grace of God go I.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson