Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: "Something Has to be Taken Away from Some People"
Townhall.com ^ | June 4, 2007 | Amanda Carpenter

Posted on 06/06/2007 12:41:35 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

During a nationally broadcast forum Monday evening on faith and politics Sen. Hillary Clinton (D.-N.Y.) attacked the free market and told listeners in that order to attain energy independence and provide universal health coverage, it would be necessary to “take away from some people.”

“An uninsured person who goes to the hospital is more likely to die than an insured person,” Clinton said. “I mean, that is a fact. So what do we do? We have to build a political consensus. And that requires people to give up a little bit of their own turf in order to create this common ground.”

She went on, “The same with energy. You know, we can’t keep talking about our dependence on foreign oil and the need to deal with global warming and the challenge that it poses to our climate and to God’s creation and just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people.”

Clinton made these comments near the end of her allotted 15-minute portion of the event.

Clinton also said that “the adult society has failed” young people “who are tremendously influenced by the media culture and by the celebrity culture.”

“I think that we have failed them in our churches, our schools and our government,” she said. “And I certainly think the free market has failed. We’ve all failed.”

The New York senator said something similar to “taking things away from some people” at a June 2004 private fundraising event in San Francisco. There, Associated Press reporter Beth Fouhy wrote that Clinton told attendees Democrats should take money back from taxpayers who benefited from President Bush’s tax cuts.

Clinton told her donors, “We're not coming to you, many of whom are well enough off that actually the tax cuts may have helped you, and say 'we're going to give you more.' We're saying, 'you know what, for America to get back on track and be fiscally responsible, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you.”

She added, “We’re going to take things away form you on behalf of the common good.”

On the campaign trail, each of the three leading Democrats running for their party’s nomination for President, Clinton, former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards and Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.), have said he or she would repeal the Bush tax cuts to help finance universal health care.

The June 4 event was hosted by Sojourners, a social justice movement for progressive Christians. Founder Jim Wallis is the author of “God’s Politics: Why the Right Gets It Wrong and the Left Doesn’t Get It.”

CNN’s Soledad O’Brien moderated the forum. It aired on that station Monday evening from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m.

Edwards and Obama also participated.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; barackobama; bush; candidates; churches; communism; economy; elections; energy; energyindependence; freemarkets; georgewbush; healthcare; hillary; hillarycare; hillaryclinton; johnedwards; liberalism; marxism; presidentbush; schools; socialism; taxcuts; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221 next last
To: subterfuge
It's also worth noting that a 500-pound person who goes into the hospital is more likely to die than a 150-pound person.

Therefore . . . for every person who is admitted into a hospital, we should start at the feet and cut off various appendages of his/her body until their weight is down to 150 pounds.

61 posted on 06/06/2007 12:58:21 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Like virginity, Bill????

What a lying loser.


62 posted on 06/06/2007 12:58:37 PM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

50%? I would say 100%.


63 posted on 06/06/2007 12:58:37 PM PDT by darkangel82 (Socialism is NOT an American value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: IncPen
I contend that Hillary is the only candidate on either side capable of inciting a civil war.

You may be right, but I contend this woman is never going to be President.

L

64 posted on 06/06/2007 12:58:49 PM PDT by Lurker (Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing small pox to plague.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

My God...This could be the end of America as we know it and the sheeple will vote for her,thus turning our Republic into Venezuela.
65 posted on 06/06/2007 12:59:05 PM PDT by 4yearlurker (Liberals, A terrorists best friend!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

She is simply and communist and ANYONE who stays home because they don’t like the Republican candidate, is a complete and utter FOOL.


66 posted on 06/06/2007 12:59:55 PM PDT by bfree (liberalism is the enemy of freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

She’s admitting that she favors government redistributing money from those who have some and giving it to those who don’t have as much. Classic communism.
She doesn’t have to worry, however, the media will never allow any one to think that she likes the philosophy of Marx.


67 posted on 06/06/2007 12:59:57 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge
I think she is just proving that she isn't "the smartest woman in the world."

Edwards and Obama are forcing her to give us at least a one-liner a week that can be used against her in the general election. This one will be one of the better ones.

68 posted on 06/06/2007 1:00:02 PM PDT by hunter112 (Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
..that means something has to be taken away from some people.”

This woman is going to start a civil war if she gets into office.

69 posted on 06/06/2007 1:00:37 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Killing all of your enemies without mercy is the only sure way of sleeping soundly at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

That’s something lefties never had a response to when they complained about Bush losing the popular vote in 2000 -

their hero Bill NEVER got a majority of the popular vote in two elections.


70 posted on 06/06/2007 1:01:09 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

“I think that we have failed them in our churches, our schools and our government,” she said. “And I certainly think the free market has failed. We’ve all failed.”

Yep, lemme see, one example:
Teaching children that fornication and adultery are OK. Even for a married President.


71 posted on 06/06/2007 1:01:14 PM PDT by HOTTIEBOY (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
“An uninsured person who goes to the hospital is more likely to die than an insured person,” Clinton said. “I mean, that is a fact. So what do we do? We have to build a political consensus. And that requires people to give up a little bit of their own turf in order to create this common ground.”

Well, the easy way to fix that is to randomly kill some people in hospitals who do have insurance. I'm from the government and I'm here to help you put this pillow over your face.

Now, as to whether this is factaully correct: Most people who die in hospitals are probably over 65. Old people are just more likely to be sick and die than younger people. Nearly everyone over 65 is covered my Medicare (unless they have avoided filling out the forms). It seems very likely that people with insurance are more likely to die in a hospital than people without insurance.

She went on, “The same with energy. You know, we can’t keep talking about our dependence on foreign oil and the need to deal with global warming and the challenge that it poses to our climate and to God’s creation and just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people.”

Maybe the people who own the oil reserves should have them taken away. Wait, most of those belong to the government in Alaska or offshore.

72 posted on 06/06/2007 1:01:51 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Parker v. DC: the best court decision of the year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"An uninsured person who goes to the hospital is more likely to die than an insured person,” Clinton said. “I mean, that is a fact."

"Nurse, do you have the list of uninsured patients? We have to be sure to provide them with substandard care. I realize it might cause us to get sued, but we hate the uninsured so much that we are willing to pay that price!"

Has she considered that other factors might be at play here? Different groups approach end-of-life issues in different ways. I had a good friend who died of cancer. She had a loving family who arranged things so she could get hospice care when staying at home. She died a peaceful death in her own bed.

Now imagine someone of the same age who had the same kind of cancer but happened to be homeless and unwilling to apply for Medicaid. (It happens.) That person would have been unlikely to seek help for the disease until it progressed to its final stages. In the final weeks of the disease, the hospital probably would have tried to keep her there, if only because she had no other place to go. She would have died in the hospital.

The urban poor (who are often uninsured) have a higher chance of being shot or hit by a car than the average person. These people will also get listed as "dying in the hospital." If they had been insured, they'd have been just as dead.

Ms. Clinton is really abusing statistics here.

73 posted on 06/06/2007 1:02:00 PM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HOTTIEBOY
Or that oral sex isn't really sex. That's what our current teenagers learned from Bill Clinton.

The thought of this communist whore becoming our president makes me physically ill.

74 posted on 06/06/2007 1:02:47 PM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Thanks anyway, Nancy, but we already have a Commander-in-Chief!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: avacado

If you really believe Mitt Romney, Duncan Hunter, John McCain, Mike Huckabee, Tommy Thompson, Jim Gilmore, Rudy Giuliani are going to cut any major departments or programs that take from some of us to give to others, I have a bridge to sell you. Even Ron Paul has been known to “bring home the bacon,” apparently.

It is true that some will govern more conservatively than others, but I wouldn’t look for any major pruning back of socialist government if I were you. If the Republican who wins the White House does initiate such cuts, I will be presently surprised.


75 posted on 06/06/2007 1:02:58 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged

Why not? They all DO love the philosophy (love of WISDOM?) of Marxism.

Far too many people in the country, including HillBillary, are genuine communists, and they know they rather like the commie countries. They can never say much good about the “capitalist” US. Please note this. It’s why we have so many scary politicos - there are too many scary people, period.


76 posted on 06/06/2007 1:04:27 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

77 posted on 06/06/2007 1:04:41 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
We're saying, 'you know what, for America to get back on track and be fiscally responsible, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you.

If I manage to steal $1 million from Hillary's bank account when I could have stolen $2 million, can I avoid jail by claiming I gave her the $1 million difference?

78 posted on 06/06/2007 1:04:41 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

She should start with her husband who has reportedly made $43 million in speakers fees over the past three years. What is just? Say, a “gift” of $30 or $40 million out of this to the deserving?


79 posted on 06/06/2007 1:05:06 PM PDT by laconic (ence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

That’s what I thought. Emergency room care is not denied to the uninsured.


80 posted on 06/06/2007 1:05:26 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson