Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Document: Iran Caught Red-Handed Shipping Arms to Taliban
The Blotter ^ | 6-6-07 | Brian Ross and Christopher Isham

Posted on 06/06/2007 4:47:58 PM PDT by Danae

NATO officials say they have caught Iran red-handed, shipping heavy arms, C4 explosives and advanced roadside bombs to the Taliban for use against NATO forces, in what the officials say is a dramatic escalation of Iran's proxy war against the United States and Great Britain.

"It is inconceivable that it is anyone other than the Iranian government that's doing it," said former White House counterterrorism official Richard Clarke, an ABC News consultant.

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stopped short earlier this week of blaming Iran, saying the U.S. did not have evidence "of the involvement of the Iranian government in support of the Taliban."

But an analysis by a senior coalition official, obtained by the Blotter on ABCNews.com, concludes there is clear evidence of Iran's involvement.

"This is part of a considered policy," says the analysis, "rather than the result of low-level corruption and weapons smuggling."

Iran and the Taliban had been fierce enemies when the Taliban was in power in Afghanistan, and their apparent collaboration came as a surprise to some in the intelligence community.

"I think their goal is to make it very clear that Iran has the capability to make life worse for the United States on a variety of fronts," said Seth Jones of the Rand Institute, "even if they have to do some business with a group that has historically been their enemy."

The coalition analysis says munitions recovered in two Iranian convoys, on April 11 and May 3, had "clear indications that they originated in Iran. Some were identical to Iranian supplied goods previously discovered in Iraq."

The April convoy was tracked from Iran into Helmand province and led a fierce firefight that destroyed one vehicle, according to the official analysis. A second vehicle was reportedly found to contain small arms ammunition, mortar rounds and more than 650 pounds of C4 demolition charges.

A second convoy of two vehicles was spotted on May 3 and led to the capture of five occupants and the seizure of RPG-7mm rockets and more than 1,000 pounds of C4, the analysis says.

Also among the munitions are components for the lethal EFPs, or explosive formed projectiles, the roadside bombs that U.S. officials say Iran has provided to Iraqi insurgents with deadly results.

"These clearly have the hallmarks of the Iranian Revolution Guards' Quds force," said Jones.

The coalition diplomatic message says the demolition charges "contained the same fake U.S. markings found on explosives recovered from insurgents operating in the Baghdad area."

"We believe these intercepted munitions are part of a much bigger flow of support from Iran to the Taliban," the message says.

The Taliban receives larger supplies of weapons through profits from opium dealing, officials say, but the Iranian presence could be significant.

"It means the insurgency in Afghanistan is likely to be prolonged," said Jones. "It would be a much more potent force."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; bombirannow; bombnukesites; bombpipelines; caughtredhanded; enemy; iran; islam; muhammadsminions; proxywars; sumggling; taliban; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 next last
To: jveritas
What we cannot do and won’t do is get involved in nation building in Iran. Once we destroy their mullahs lock on power, it’s up to the Iranians to figure out if they want to be free.
81 posted on 06/06/2007 7:41:29 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Al Qaeda knows Iraq's strategic value, yet the Democrats work day and night for our defeat there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: TalkingPoint

President Bush will launch the Air and Naval war against the terrorist regime Iran before he leaves office, and I layed out the scenario that I envision how it going to be in post # 72.


82 posted on 06/06/2007 7:43:51 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: unspun

I agree, hook in the jaw.


83 posted on 06/06/2007 7:44:00 PM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Agree but if the Iranian people rise up against the mullahs after taking advantage of weakened regime because the Air War the US launched against the regime, do not you think that in this case we should provide some support to the Iranians to make sure them succeed. I am not talking about ground troops because this requires a million troop to do, but keep the Air and Naval assault on what ever oppressive tools the terrorists mullahs still have.


84 posted on 06/06/2007 7:47:18 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

As much as I respect you, I don’t think you appreciate fully how weak our military resolve has become because of the liberals constant undermining of our security efforts.


85 posted on 06/06/2007 7:49:31 PM PDT by Nachoman (I can't help the way I think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Absolutely, I think we should be funneling them weapons now since they’ve been waging an undeclared war on us since 1979. To the Iranians who want to be free, I’d say we’ll help you with the weapons and tools. We could in some situations where it’d be helpful provide air cover, but obviously no ground troops except possibly Special Forces. The mullahs have made this necessary. It must go from concept to deed.
86 posted on 06/06/2007 7:54:03 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Al Qaeda knows Iraq's strategic value, yet the Democrats work day and night for our defeat there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Danae

We should be bombing Iran 24x7 until they stand down.


87 posted on 06/06/2007 7:55:20 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Regarding nation building in Iran if it comes to that...I totally agree that it would be foolish to try in Iran what we have attempted and are failing to do in Iraq.

The Iranian people are much more educated and self sufficient than the Iraqi people were at the time of regime change. A large majority of the Iranian population is under 30 years old and will be far better off to figure out how to create a more moderate government than they currently have.

Hopefully we have learned that we can no longer occupy these countries or try to craft a US-like government with a hands-on approach. This should not stop us from bombing their nuclear and conventional weapons factories immediately though. Wouldn’t it be a joy to see the people rise up and purge the Ayatollahs from power as a result!


88 posted on 06/06/2007 7:58:06 PM PDT by ParaVet93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman
President Bush resolve is still strong my FRiend despite all the propaganda against him. Yes liberals, defeatists, and traitors, and even few on our side have been undermining the war and the military for long time but the President is still standing fast and we saw the latest showdown in the war funding bill and thanks God the President, our troops, and America won.
89 posted on 06/06/2007 8:00:39 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Agree 100%.


90 posted on 06/06/2007 8:01:26 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

“happening inside Iraq long before”

So you think that covert operations are working secretly inside Iran?

I hope that they are.

But, what about all the weapons that are being shipped from Iran to kill our guys now?


91 posted on 06/06/2007 8:10:43 PM PDT by garjog (Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All
YAWWWWWWWNNNNNN.....

So, who's watching American Idol tonight?

92 posted on 06/06/2007 8:12:10 PM PDT by Old Sarge (+ /_\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluebeak

“What will be the media reports after Iran nukes Israel?”

Maybe this: If only Bush had been more sensitive to Islamic culture and tried to talk to the terrorists this would not have happened.

Once again America is to blame for another international tragedy.

We must declare Sharia Law in the US and publicly execute Bush as a gesture of good faith so that they will stop trying to hurt us.


93 posted on 06/06/2007 8:16:10 PM PDT by garjog (Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Danae; All
Iran and the Taliban had been fierce enemies when the Taliban was in power in Afghanistan, and their apparent collaboration came as a surprise to some in the intelligence community

Why would this come as a surprise to people in intelligence? The enemy of my enemy is my friend!!!!!

94 posted on 06/06/2007 8:17:06 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Can you imagine if weapons and explosives were being delivered from the USA to Iranian dissidents that the media would accept uncritically the idea that there is no evidence that these were being provided by the Bush Administration, so it’s not Bush’s responsibility?

It’s pathetic when Bush gets blamed for idiotically remote problems (prison abuse in Baghdad, hurricane in LA), but the Iranians don’t get blamed for anything despite waging open war on us.


95 posted on 06/06/2007 8:41:21 PM PDT by Starrgaizr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Bush talked real big, eh? What a disaster he has become.


96 posted on 06/06/2007 8:43:04 PM PDT by Blowtorch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fedora; Fred Nerks; ...

...but other than that, what has Iran done to anyone? ;’)


97 posted on 06/06/2007 9:02:28 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated May 31, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae
"I think their goal is to make it very clear that Iran has the capability to make life worse for the United States on a variety of fronts," said Seth Jones of the Rand Institute

Then obviously we need to respond in kind. Maybe by bunker busting their nuclear facilities?

98 posted on 06/06/2007 9:28:50 PM PDT by upchuck (If you don't have borders, you won't have a nation ~ Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Sanctions and a Vote of no Confidence at the UN should straighten them out. yup


99 posted on 06/06/2007 9:56:23 PM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae
...and their apparent collaboration came as a surprise to some in the intelligence community.

Everyone to whome this was a suprise should have their clearances revoked and kicked to the curb where they can get jobs more appropriate to their analytical skill.

Perhaps they find something where the toughest question they will encounter is, "would you like fries with that?"

100 posted on 06/06/2007 10:10:37 PM PDT by PsyOp (Few people can distinguish between true good things and their opposites. - Juvenal, Satires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson