Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush administration again lies about border security: Debra Burlingame
9/11 Families for America ^ | June 16, 2006 | Tim Sumner

Posted on 06/16/2007 10:41:59 AM PDT by Sergeant Tim

Last night, Constitutional expert and talk-radio host Mark Levin spoke with Debra Burlingame about the now revived ‘Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007.’ The proponents of the bill in Congress and the administration are lying to the American people. That is not new news:

Debra Burlingame: “This amnesty bill is really a boom to the enemy. I guarantee you that al Qaeda has their guys lined up to get their amnesty, the ones already here and the ones who will come here. They will defraud this system to get their Social Security cards… How do we know that? There is a history for it. The 1993 World Trade Center bombing, there were more than 10 people associated with and convicted in that. Three of them got amnesty by claiming the were agricultural workers under a … special agricultural workers program that was part of the 1986 amnesty. Thank you very much, Ted Kennedy.

“The CIA shooter who murdered two people outside Langley [CIA HQs], he applied for amnesty in 1986 and was declined. He stayed anyhow because we had no way of knowing that he was still here. We didn’t have an entry and exit and entry system. So, Congress ordered one up in 1996 and … we haven’t got it still. In fact, last fall [Secretary of Homeland Security] Michael Chertoff said building one would be cost prohibitive, it would cost billions of dollars and would take more than ten years. One of the things they are saying about this bill is, it is going to have an entry and exit system. That’s a lie. These people will not go home and we will have no proof whether they did or not.”

Mark Levin: “They are still litigating in the courts whether or not it is Constitutional for our government to require people who leave the country to report that they are leaving the country.”

Debra Burlingame: “…Michelle Malkin has a phrase, “It is not over, legally, until the alien wins.” I went through this bill … I went directly to border security because that was what interested me most. Every single provision has this phrase before you get to the details, “Subject to the availability of funds.” ... That's what they do when they pass these bills, they hold back the funds.

"What documents are they going to accept to prove identity with these millions and millions of people? In 2002, this was five years ago and the problem has gotten worse, the GAO did a report and they found “rampant and pervasive document fraud.” There is a backlog of Green Card cases, this in 2002, they had a backlog then of four million cases, an increase of 50% over six years and the report said, “The staff is rewarded for timely handling of petitions,” rather than scrutiny on the merits. How is this going to happen now if suddenly they are inundated with 12 to 20 million applications…”

Mark Levin: “They can’t do it. It is absolutely impossible. They can’t do it and they won’t do it.”

Debra Burlingame: “And they know they can’t do it. They are lying to the American people.

"Meanwhile, I had someone very high up in this administration tell me when I asked him, point blank … this before I was able to read the whole thing because they snuck this in and wanted to get it passed in 48 hours without anyone reading it … will this bill have authority for state and local law enforcement to enforce these laws... “Absolutely,” said this member of the Bush administration. Three days later, when all those amendments were being poured out on to the floor of the Senate, out came an amendment giving state and local law enforcement the ability with probable cause to scrutinize the legal presence of a suspect if they have probable cause to believe a person is here illegally. That was roundly voted down. So this person was not only not telling me the truth, when someone tried to put it in there, it was voted out.

"This is undemocratic, what they are doing. And we know that people -- however they feel about how these people should be managed that are here -- 80% polled say give us border security first and they are not doing it."

Mark Levin: "Why won't they do it?"

Debra Burlingame: "I think a clue is when you look at President Bush, who announced his phoney gesture of good faith, four-point-four billion dollars for a fence ... they are going to build half of what they enacted last year, he was addressing a construction trade association, the biggest users of cheap labor. I think they want an endless supply". [Editor -- This transcript above is of the first half of the interview. The entire interview can be heard at the bolded link.]

Congress and the Bush administration have used “subject to the availability of funds” to not fully implement the border security provisions of every bill they have passed and signed into law since 9/11.

The 'Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act' authorized 10,000 new border agents, 40,000 additional detention beds, and 4,000 new immigration enforcement agents yet all three were funded well below 50% of authorization. In fact, the Bush administration attempted to provide a mere 210 new border agents for FY 2006 yet was eventually forced to fund 700 new agents for both FY 2006 and 2007.

Congress overwhelmingly passed the REAL ID Act and President Bush signed it into law on May 11, 2005. Its implementation was waived until the end of next year and the administration has yet to speak out against its proposed repeal. While Peter Gadiel says, “The CATO Institute and ACLU have successfully lobbied states to not implement the provisions of the ‘REAL ID Act’,” due to “privacy concern,” the federal government has provided them further cover by authorizing less than half the needed funding

Concerning the current immigration bill's entry and exit system proposal, “In December 2006, the Bush administration decided to shelve plans to develop a facial or fingerprint recognition system to track whether international visitors leave the country on time via one of the country's many land ports of entry, although such a system is being deployed at international-gateway airports.”

Many states have authorized Mexico’s matricula ID card to be used (to varying degrees) as official proof of a person’s identity, even though one can easily be obtained on a street corner. When issued by Mexican consulates, the breeder documents accepted are highly suspect. A Mexican official has said, “[T]hey rely on the expertise of the staff in the 47 consulates to visually authenticate the documents,” yet standards vary from consulate to consulate. In addition, there probably never will be a single database for these cards. Despite these inherent security weaknesses, they are often used as picture ID to board commercial aircraft and have been used to enter federal buildings. The Bush administration has conspiring with Mexico to further a “silent amnesty” policy by allowing matricula ID cards to be used in lieu of passport and visa requirements.

We must end their lies by demanding that they secure our borders first.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911families; aliens; amnesty; borders; bordersecurity; immigrantlist; immigration; noamnestyforillegals; vampirebill; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: Sergeant Tim

bump for later


21 posted on 06/16/2007 11:09:33 AM PDT by Christian4Bush ("Polls are for strippers and liberals." Caller to Rush, 6/5/2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter

You chose your lines wisely I see. : - )

Very impressive!

22 posted on 06/16/2007 11:10:40 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Czar; Borax Queen; potlatch; devolve; janetgreen
"Meanwhile, I had someone very high up in this administration tell me when I asked him, point blank … this before I was able to read the whole thing because they snuck this in and wanted to get it passed in 48 hours without anyone reading it … will this bill have authority for state and local law enforcement to enforce these laws... “Absolutely,” said this member of the Bush administration. Three days later, when all those amendments were being poured out on to the floor of the Senate, out came an amendment giving state and local law enforcement the ability with probable cause to scrutinize the legal presence of a suspect if they have probable cause to believe a person is here illegally. That was roundly voted down. So this person was not only not telling me the truth, when someone tried to put it in there, it was voted out.

Liars, all!

23 posted on 06/16/2007 11:11:57 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

BUMP


24 posted on 06/16/2007 11:13:02 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

“The more we learn about the bill- the worse it gets for us in the immediate and long-term future of America.”

One thing I’m glad to see is truth being laid out for everyone to view, that easily a year ago would have been chalked up to crazy conspiracy theories. Our Country has not even passed the 300 year mark. Merely a baby in the ‘ole history books. Conservatism and Patriotism is alive and well, and I’m glad to see it! Hat’s off for what your doing!


25 posted on 06/16/2007 11:13:53 AM PDT by jedward (Mission '08 - Take back the House & Senate. No Negotiations...No Prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon
Who is congress working for, who is the president working for, who is the House of Representatives working for?

Themselves, their families, and legacy it would appear.

Who is paying for this work however is a prudent question to ask.

26 posted on 06/16/2007 11:14:19 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere; Travis McGee

Must read ping


27 posted on 06/16/2007 11:14:42 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: EGPWS
Where have you been?

I have know all along that too many were liars, and there have always been corrupt politician, but before talk radio and the internet the news media covered for them. Right now I'll bet I could count on one hand the few who aren't, or don't appear to be, but I even have doubts about them.

29 posted on 06/16/2007 11:17:08 AM PDT by YellowRoseofTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jeffers

The problem now (if I remember my government class correctly) is that impeaching Bush means our VP would be who????....Nancy Pelosi...right?

We just are in a hornet’s nest at the moment!


30 posted on 06/16/2007 11:17:28 AM PDT by YouGoTexasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Beth528; nicmarlo; janetgreen

OMG, *gasp* - post 28!


31 posted on 06/16/2007 11:19:04 AM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Beth528

Hey Beth528.


32 posted on 06/16/2007 11:19:41 AM PDT by jedward (Mission '08 - Take back the House & Senate. No Negotiations...No Prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

All hail the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007!

33 posted on 06/16/2007 11:20:14 AM PDT by Barnacle (Then they came for the Talk Show Hosts. But, I said nothing, because I was not a Talk Show Host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nthompsonwhitehouse

Please read this and pass on to those in the White House who are apparently incapable? unwilling? to hear the voices of Americans.

This piece, combined with the fine work done by Senator Jeff Sessions on the 20 Loopholes found here:
http://sessions.senate.gov/pressapp/record.cfm?id=275456

..should give people at the White House some reading material for the weekend.


34 posted on 06/16/2007 11:21:09 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

“time for a major revolt”

check this out: http://www.conservativetruth.org/library/fed29.html

“It is, therefore, with the most evident propriety, that the plan of the convention proposes to empower the Union “to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia, . . . “

Hamilton, the great Federalist not only expressly recognizes a right for the “yeomanry” (that’s you and me, the `hoplites’) to possess arms, but states that the federal government should arm us!

I know it’s a cliche, but the 2nd Amendment isn’t about hunting.
Since there’s nothing in the Constitution about paying for a woman to practice infanticide as a means of birth-control, but they pay for that. I’m a member of the militia. Where’s my Armalite?!

Why are they/we to be armed? (same paper, next to last para.)
“Do they (a tyrannical government) usually commence their career by wanton and disgustful acts of power, calculated to answer no end, but to draw upon themselves universal hatred and execration?

And last para.: “In times of insurrection, or invasion, it would be natural and proper that the militia of a neighboring State should be marched into another, to resist a common enemy, or to guard the republic against the violence of faction or sedition.”

The Union didn’t hesitate to take up arms against its countrymen (insurrection about 1860) but won’t lift a finger now to assist the parts of the Nation now under siege from a foreign invasion.
And, thanks to our Senate and President, we plan to surrender to illegal aliens as soon as possible.
They are a disgrace to America.


35 posted on 06/16/2007 11:21:31 AM PDT by tumblindice (Hi there! I'm a compassionate conservative and I'm here to take from you for the common good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

From the L.A. Times

1. 40% of all workers in L.A. County ( L.A. County has 10.2 million people) are working for cash and not paying taxes. This is because they are predominantly illegal immigrants working without a green card.

2. 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens.

3. 75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens

4. Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal , whose births were paid for by taxpayers.

5. Nearly 35% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals here illegally.

6. Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.

7. The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border.

8. Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal.

9. 21 radio stations in L.A. are Spanish speaking.

10. In L.A. County 5.1 million people speak English, 3.9 million speak Spanish.
(There are 10.2 million people in L.A. County ).

(All of the above are from the Los Angeles Times)

Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops, but 29% are on welfare.

Over 70% of the United States ‘ annual population growth (and over 90% of California , Florida , and New York ) results from immigration.

29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens.

We are a bunch of fools for letting this continue.

WHY CAN’T WE SEND THEM HOME?????


36 posted on 06/16/2007 11:21:39 AM PDT by GFritsch ('All men will hate you because of me, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved'." -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beth528

Would you kindly request the Mod remove that post. We don’t need to demean the Office of the Presidency. I understand your sentiment, though I consider myself a Patriot also.


37 posted on 06/16/2007 11:22:29 AM PDT by jedward (Mission '08 - Take back the House & Senate. No Negotiations...No Prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GFritsch

Please post a link for those stats? I am having a hard time grasping some of those numbers..

Thanks!


38 posted on 06/16/2007 11:24:04 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Beth528

George is curious about amnesty.


39 posted on 06/16/2007 11:24:08 AM PDT by Barnacle (Then they came for the talk show hosts. But, I said nothing because I was not a talk show host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx
I have know all along that too many were liars, and there have always been corrupt politician, but before talk radio and the Internet the news media covered for them.

THAT being the case, we need to ban the Internet and bloggers from conveying the truth.

We mustn't usurp the power bestowed upon the MSM! /s

40 posted on 06/16/2007 11:24:25 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson