Skip to comments.
Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job ($54 million suit backfires)
The Examiner ^
| 06/15/07
| Scott McCabe and Dan Genz
Posted on 06/17/2007 12:45:46 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster
Administrative law judge Roy Pearson leaves court after the second day of his trial in Washington on Wednesday. Jin and Soo Chung are being sued by Pearson for $54 million for what he calls 'misleading signage' at their dry-cleaning business. |
2
posted on
06/17/2007 12:48:11 AM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I have a funny feeling this talentless hack thinks Koreans should be his slaves
3
posted on
06/17/2007 12:52:08 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction)
To: TigerLikesRooster
This judicial terrorist, and I have no other name to call him, should be forced to pay 54 million to the couple whose lives he tried to destroy. That would small repayment for what he put them through.
4
posted on
06/17/2007 1:03:44 AM PDT
by
Bookie1066
(What part of illegal don't you understand?)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Affirmative action at work?
This judge shouldn’t be trusted judging a coin toss.
5
posted on
06/17/2007 1:07:57 AM PDT
by
jwh_Denver
(Press 1 for English. Not me, I press 2 and say I can't speak Spanish.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
THIS is a victim.....
THIS is a victimizer.
6
posted on
06/17/2007 1:10:03 AM PDT
by
Dumpster Baby
("Hope somebody finds me before the rats do .....")
To: TigerLikesRooster
>>In 2005, in his divorce suit, Virginia courts ordered him to pay his ex-wife, also a lawyer, $12,000 for creating unnecessary litigation and threatening her and her attorney with disbarment.
At the time of the ruling, he had no steady job, no bank account and less than $2,000 in cash.<<
So of course they made him a judge...
7
posted on
06/17/2007 1:10:34 AM PDT
by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
To: gondramB
You know the old saying: A judge is a lawyer who’s too lazy to chase his own ambulances.
8
posted on
06/17/2007 1:24:26 AM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
("My wife's credit cards were stolen. I didn't report the theft. Whoever had them was spending less.")
To: TigerLikesRooster
Pearson broke down on the stand twice trying to describe the day he learned that he would never see his pants again. He really loved those pants
9
posted on
06/17/2007 1:24:44 AM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
(90% of everything is trash - Theodore Sturgeon)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Well, if he wins the 54 million, he won’t need a job.
10
posted on
06/17/2007 1:27:43 AM PDT
by
Krankor
(kROGER)
To: dennisw
This is serious. This is trouser reparations.
To: TigerLikesRooster
I’m surprised he wasn’t taken down already by a judicial ethics committee on grounds of being stark raving nuts crazy.
To: HiTech RedNeck
Im surprised he wasnt taken down already by a judicial ethics committee on grounds of being stark raving nuts crazy. That's a disqualification?
13
posted on
06/17/2007 1:42:39 AM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(Gaza: Your one-stop schadenfreude entertainment center.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
To: TigerLikesRooster
It amazes me that a man with his education and status would pursue something so trivial and stupid. The conduct committee should terminate his office.
15
posted on
06/17/2007 1:57:13 AM PDT
by
garylmoore
(Faith is the assurance of things unseen.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
16
posted on
06/17/2007 2:03:05 AM PDT
by
MistrX
To: garylmoore
He obviously has mental problems.
Surprises me that Al and Jessie were not there to lend their support for the judge.
17
posted on
06/17/2007 2:11:41 AM PDT
by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia, DUNCAN or THOMPSON 08, ELECTION 2008, MOST IMPORTANT OF MY LIFE TIME)
To: TigerLikesRooster
As a trial lawyer, I am against most forms of tort reform.
I am for serious repercussions against this lawyer/judge for frivolous litigation.
I mean serious.
18
posted on
06/17/2007 2:12:10 AM PDT
by
Iwo Jima
("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
To: Iwo Jima
Oh, there will be. Maybe offset by the value of the pants he lost. (Like removing a drop from a bucket.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
Like attorneys fees to the defendant and suspension of his law license.
20
posted on
06/17/2007 2:20:18 AM PDT
by
Iwo Jima
("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson