Posted on 07/17/2007 6:41:56 AM PDT by RightPhalanx
Politico's Jonathan Martin reports on Mitt Romney's newest campaign commercial, "Ocean." The new ad comes amid many reports of how much money Romney and all the other campaigns are spending. The breathlessness of the reporting doesn't allow the key questions to be asked: "What are the candidates getting for their dollars?" and "Is the campaign hitting its targets in contributions and expenditures?" In Romney's case we know he's patiently built a small lead in Iowa and New Hampshire, and from "Ocean" we get evidence that he's implementing a new step in a carefully conceived plan and doing so with the sort of innovative appeal that those who have observed his business life expected from the first day of the campaign.
"Ocean" is interesting on a number of levels. First, its substance --a concern for the degraded culture in which American children grow up-- is powerful, and not just for Republican primary voters, but for all parents and people who love kids. Second, its visual approach is unique for the cycle. Over the decades the presidential television spot has become more and more direct, and less and less interesting. "Ocean's" got a chance at being memorable in the way very very few ads turn out to be. Finally, the ad reminds people that among Romney's achievements is a wonderful family, and that he truly does believe the words he speaks.
The ad appears two days before Romney speaks at the Lincoln Day Dinner in El Paso County, Colorado. El Paso County is home to, among other groups, James Dobson's Focus on the Family and Young Life, two of the region's many evangelical organizations. The message of "Ocean" is one that every evangelical can agree with and applaud. Martin speculates that "this ad is yet more evidence of Romney trying to 'close the deal' with social conservatives," but while it certainly helps remind conservative voters of Romney's core values, I expect this theme to remain front and center throughout the general campaign if Romney is the nominee. The argument about the culture's decline and its impact on children is one that media elites regularly hoot at but which always resonates with soccer moms and coaching dads. Romney's putting out a notice that this will be an issue for his campaign, and seeing their agenda as part of the roll out of Romney's agenda is very reassuring to many social conservatives.
As is the sense that this campaign has a plan. Visit the Romney website if you haven't done so recently. Along with Rudy's, Hillary's and Obama's, it is quite obviously the product of a campaign that understands the virtual campaign as central to success in 2008. (Fred Thompson's unofficial campaign has a clunky site that underscores the disadvantage of not being a full fledged candidate in a race that has been full fledged since January.) A presidential primary campaign is not a bus ride with reporters along or a series of press conferences, but a short-lived $100 million dollar sprint which is already about half over. Iowa voters caucus on Monday, January 14, 2008 and by midnight on Super Duper Tuesday, February 5, both parties will have their nominees. To get to the nomination, the candidates have to have built and implemented a complex and comprehensive plan, and Romney's team gives every indication of having done just that. When Romney loaned himself $6.5 million in Q2, I assumed it was because that's what the plan called for to have met its goals, and that his personal financial commitment is to assure that the plan is implemented at every stage. Reviewing the ruins of the McCain campaign and you read accounts of successive blueprints drawn up and torn up in a sort of a carnival of lousy planning. (Here's another article from Martin on that subject.) All you hear coming out of Team Romney is the message, from the candidate or his many surrrogates. That's the sound of a campaign running on all its cylinders.
Last week a friend in Colorado, a very successful businessman long active in Rocky Mountain politics, e-mailed me that after close study he was going to send money to Romney as the best chance the GOP had in 2008. I suspect that is happening again and again as the Fred boomlet begins to flatten against the realities of what is necessary in 2008 --energy and extraordinary discipline. The Rudy-Romney race is far from over, and Thompson still could show the sort of planning a campaign in the new millennium requires, but the time for the Tennessee senator to get in and get organized is very short.
Why? Consider that when Florida changed its primary to January 29, in reality it announced that absentee ballots would be available long before that, and that "early voting" in the Sunshine State would get underway on January 15 --the day after the Iowa caucus results are in. California's absentee ballots will be available from early January forward, and 47% of the ballots cast in the last California primary --June, 2006-- were by absentee. Building an absentee ballot "chase" program is expensive, and all of those ballots in all of those states will be greatly impacted by the results in Iowa and New Hampshire, which increases the importance of those states beyond their already high value in the 2004 cycle.
All of which suggests that the strategic contributor --the donor who held back to see what happened early on and which candidate put together the best team and rolled out the most coherent plan while demonstrating in the early debates the stage presence and the early commercials the innovation that would be necessary to get to the main event-- might still pick Rudy on the basis of the national polls, but the donor who is really interested in making one contribution to the one candidate who will get the nomination and possibly the White House is looking very hard at the very professionally run Romney campaign.
“Talk is nice, but it’s also very cheap. What exactly can or would he do as President to “clean up” television, movies and the internet?”
There may not be much that a President can initiate legislatively, given the courts’ position. But he can name judges to the bench who understand that importance of setting some standards in the culture. Also, the President has a great deal of influence on the national moral tone, just by the things he says and does.
Look at the damage Clinton did while he was there. A man like Romney would not do any damage, and might do some good, just by the things he emphasizes.
I agree with you except that it believes in enforced morality and you can see this stance magnified by Romney’s commercial.
You don’t agree? Just try to by a drink in Utah....or a car on Sunday. And yes there are “blue” laws in other States, but do you want a President that wants to see them instituted nationwide?
It’s easy to get a drink in Utah. Anbody who wants one can get one.
“What exactly can or would he do as President to “clean up” television, movies and the internet?”Teenage pregnancy and abortion rates went way down under Clinton, but I'm not willing to give him much credit for that.
I guess you’ll have to elect him to find out. Teen pregnacy and abortions have gone down with seven years of a President preaching abstinence.
And retail outlets that close on Sunday do so because they choose to. There is no law requiring it.
And you know this, why?....how?
Because I’m very familiar with the liquor laws.
Now this analysis makes more sense. It’ll be interesting to see how things pan out. I guess that’s what makes politics interesting.
However, I wouldn’t say Romney is a frontrunner? Or how a frontrunner status is necessarily a bad thing, ie. I wouldn’t compare McCain’s “frontrunner” status to Guilliani’s or Romney’s.
“If you check the list that was just posted a few days ago you will see the the DC Marriott was #1 in “Rent a Hooker” calls. #1 by a very wide margin”
Yeah, Romney’s practically running a brothel. Who does he think he is?!? This charade won’t last. He’s a pornographer and a pimp. I mean look, he was on the board that confirms it.
The fact is there isn’t a hotel chain in America that doesn’t offer an in-room movie service.
The fact is there isn’t a hotel chain in America that doesn’t offer an in-room movie service.
Omni Hotels doesn't.
Look, I think hitting him on the hotel porn charge is pretty silly, until he makes it a campaign focus. If this is such a big issue for him, why do we think he would suddenly "clean up" the waters he helped to dirty?
“The fact is there isn’t a hotel chain in America that doesn’t offer an in-room movie service.”
This wasn’t in room movie service, it was in room Hooker service!
That’s is kind of like a non-smoker talking about how easy it is to smoke at least 20 ft away from the entrance to a building, in the rain.
Non-drinkers who aren’t familiar with the laws of other States really can’t speak about liquor laws unless/until they try to actually comply with them, then they may run into a different scenario.
“This wasn’t in room movie service, it was in room Hooker service!”
I couldn’t find it on their ammenities list. Must be for Marriott Reward Members only.
Along with the power to appoint judges, the bully pulpit is the president's greatest power. Compare the effect of Clinton's public words and actions to that of President Reagan's. Most of Reagan's triumphs were purely rhetorical, but highly influential. Think of Reagan's steadfast opposition to abortion, or his demand to Gorbachev to "tear down that wall."
http://www.lds.org/news/archiveday/0,5287,2796,00.html
The “DC Madam” was running her rent a hooker service for a long time and the DC Marriott was #1 in the phone records.
“Omni Hotels doesn’t.”
Next time I want to pay $300.00/ night I’ll keep them in mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.