Threat against global warming skeptic

The Washington Times ^ | July 27, 2007 | John McCaslin

[Always Right]

Yep, even at the highest levels the global warming supporters are nothing by a bunch of hateful eco-terrorists who don’t care about the facts.

[sourcery]

Basic References:

• Hostages to a hoax
• The Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate Change (PDF)
• Up against the warming zealots
• When Physics Trumps Hysteria in Global Warming
• Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
• Geophysical, archeological and historical evidence support a solar-output model for climate change (PDF)
• Gamma rays and climate (PDF)
• Temperature vs. Cosmic Ray Flux
• Linkages between solar activity, climate predictability and water resource development (PDF)
• Proof on Ice: Southern Greenland Was Once Green; Earth Warmer
• Global Warming and Nature's Thermostat
• The Past and Future of Climate (PDF)
• The Great Global Warming Swindle
• IceCap

Lawrence Solomon's "The Deniers" (a series of articles on the view of scientists who have been labelled "Global Warming Deniers"):

• Science, not politics
• Statistics needed
• The original denier: into the cold
• End the chill
• They call this a consensus?
• The limits of predictability
• Unsettled science
• Models trump measurements
• The ice-core man
• The hurricane expert who stood up to UN junk science
• Polar scientists on thin ice
• The sun moves climate change
• Bright sun, warm Earth. Coincidence?
• Look to Mars for the truth on global warming
• Read the sunspots
• Forget warming - beware the new ice age
• Little Ice Age is still with us
• Fighting climate 'fluff'

Other References:

• Alarmist global warming claims melt under scientific scrutiny
• The Global Warming Myth
• Father of Climatology Throws Up at the Thought of Al Gore's 'An Inconvenient Truth'
• IPCC Scientists Challenge Al Gore’s View of Global Warming Consensus
• Swedish Scientist Accuses UN's IPCC of Falsifying Data and Destroying Evidence
• CO2 Science
• Global Warming and Climate Forcing by Recent Albedo Changes on Mars
• Climate Momentum Shifting: Prominent Scientists Reverse Belief in Man-made Global Warming - Now Skeptics
• The Real 'Inconvenient Truth'
• New findings indicate today's greenhouse gas levels not unusual
• Climate Change: Incorrect information on pre-industrial CO2
• Global Warming as a Religion
• I Was On the Global Warming Gravy Train (By David Evans)
• Global Warming: it's not caused by greenhouse gases says academic
• Still Waiting for Greenhouse
• GREENIE WATCH
• Why Global Warming Would be Good for You
• Global Warming Primer (PDF)
• Global Warming: An Official Pseudoscience
• Sun's Output Increasing in Possible Trend Fueling Global Warming
• Fiddler On The Roof
• Debating Global Warming
• Climate Resistance

[Logophile]

"It is my intention to destroy your career as a liar," Mr. Eckhart wrote. "If you produce one more editorial against climate change, I will launch a campaign against your professional integrity. I will call you a liar and charlatan to the Harvard community of which you and I are members. I will call you out as a man who has been bought by Corporate America. Go ahead, guy. Take me on."

Mr. Eckhart undoubtedly considers himself a paragon of reason, kindness, and good sense. Just ask him.

[Thrownatbirth]

Good call by Inhofe. He’s on full moonbat alert.

[agere_contra]

Hey Eckart, eat my Graphs! I got your 'professional integrity' right here!

[SuziQ]

Hmmm. Sounds like Harvard should host a debate between Michael Echkhart and Marlo Lewis on the scientific evidence, or lack thereof, of antropogenic causes of ‘Global Warming’. I mean, if they’re all for finding out the truth, it shouldn’t be a problem, right?

[Disambiguator]

Yep, even at the highest levels the global warming supporters are nothing by a bunch of hateful eco-terrorists who don’t care about the facts.

Plus, they come off sounding like snotty 13 year-olds.

[upchuck]

"It is my intention to destroy your career as a liar," Mr. Eckhart wrote.

If he succeeds, I suppose Mr. Johnson will have no choice, since he can no longer be a liar, but to be truthful and honest.

Mr. Eckhart, you're an idiot!

[cripplecreek]

"Go ahead, guy. Take me on."

I'm guessing he wasn't really expecting it to happen.

[LiteKeeper]

What an idiot!!!!!

[Bigh4u2]

The man just threatened extortion.

Lock him up!

[LiteKeeper]

From the article: In a written response sent to Inside the Beltway last week, Mr. Eckhart apologized to "all the public who were offended" by his choice of words. He said he intended his letter to be a "private communication" in the context of "personal combat and jousting."

However, this column earlier this week published another letter Mr. Eckhart sent in September to CEI President Fred Smith, saying "my children will have a lesser life because you are being paid by oil companies to spread a false story."

He said he would give CEI, which advocates "sound science," 90 days to reverse its "position" on global warming, "or I will take every action I can think of to shut you down," including filing complaints with the Internal Revenue Service "on the basis that CEI is really a lobbyist for the energy industry."

Speaks for itself!

[Publius6961]

Why do I have a feeling that this moonbat is the unnamed person refered to in this anecdote from a few years ago? The anger-management issues tend to point in that direction.

With the publication of the article in Science, I gained significant credibility in the community of scientists working on climate change. They thought I was one of them.... One of them let his guard down. A major person working in the area of climate change and global warming sent me an astonishing email that said: "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."-- Nir J Shaviv

[Clioman]

Even in academia there are standards. My advice would be not to get mad. Instead, get even. When Ward Churchill’s ‘work’ FINALLY came under rigorous scrutiny, it turned out to be full of lies, half-lies, and out-right thefts. How do you suppose this foaming-at-the-mouth moonbat would fare if his work came under a similar examination?

[Always Right]

Even in academia there are standards. My advice would be not to get mad. Instead, get even. When Ward Churchill’s ‘work’ FINALLY came under rigorous scrutiny, it turned out to be full of lies, half-lies, and out-right thefts. How do you suppose this foaming-at-the-mouth moonbat would fare if his work came under a similar examination?

The problem is when liberals lies are found out it is usually too late. They lied about abortion, but that helped get Roe v. Wade. They lie about DDT, and that led to a ban. They lie about the war, and that helped public sentiment go against the war. They lie about homosexuality being genetic. They lie about global warming. They consistently advance their agenda with lies and get away with it.

[Nahanni]

If this were the middle ages the LLL’s and the Democrats would be the ones burning people at the stake, branding “heretics” with branding irons and stoning to death all who do not believe in and support the dogma of Our Transgendered Lady of the “Common Good” church. it would be they, not conservatives who would excommunicate Copernicus and Galileo for daring to dispute the “truth”.

Congratulations Democrats and LLL’s, you have become what you swear you hate. It does explain the psychotic behaviour of many Democrats and other LLL’s. it also explains why they love the Islamofascists so much.

[Tzimisce]

Hm

[GingisK]

Religious nuts.

[Beckwith]

I sent this airhead, Eckhart, a scathing email. This is his response:

Dear Mr. XXXXXXX:

I’m very sorry that you were offended by my email, and apologize to you. Please see my statement on this below. I’ll be happy to reply to any further comments you may have.

Sincerely,
Mike
Michael T. Eckhart

He included at the end a thousand words that basically said his threats were a private communication and he shouldn't be exposed as the Enviro-NAZI he is. Eckhart is truly a very insane person.