Ethics "Bill"
Posted on 08/02/2007 11:53:14 AM PDT by jazusamo
(08-02) 11:42 PDT WASHINGTON, (AP) --
The Senate voted Thursday to make lawmakers disclose more about their efforts to fund pet projects and raise money from lobbyists, a move some called the biggest advance in congressional ethics in decades.
The 83 to 14 vote, which sends the bill to President Bush, prompted Democrats to claim fulfillment of their 2006 campaign promise to crack down on lobbying abuses that sent some lawmakers and a prominent lobbyist to prison.
The bill would require lawmakers to disclose those lobbyists who raise $15,000 or more for them within a six-month period by "bundling" donations from many people. Lawmakers seeking targeted spending projects, or "earmarks," would have to publicize their plans in advance, although critics said the requirements are hardly airtight.
The Democratic-crafted bill would bar lawmakers from taking gifts from lobbyists or their clients. Former senators would have to wait two years before lobbying Congress; ex-House members would have to wait one year.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., called it "the most sweeping reform bill since Watergate."
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
Ethics "Bill"
He looks good there. :-)
does it require Di Fi to disclose how much her husband has made off U S military contracts, i wonder?
In other words...
Our congresscritters have already figured out the new loopholes.
It’s something at least.
So it’s a big step beyond what the Republicans ever did.
So it’s a big win for Democrats.
Didn’t Mitch McConnell just say on Tuesday that Senate Republicans would resist this bill because it didn’t go far enough? Two days later its passes with a veto-proof majority? What the heck is going on here?
sounds good like other things rats do , but it only addresses lobbying from what I can see, not all their special projects.
“Didn’t Mitch McConnell just say on Tuesday that Senate Republicans would resist this bill because it didn’t go far enough? Two days later its passes with a veto-proof majority? What the heck is going on here?”
The crook realized that his phony outrage wasn’t playing well in Peoria. Democrats score a win, no matter the “faults” of how far the bill went.
I happened upon Senator DeMint’s comments on CSPAN today. He made a number of critcisms regarding how the bill was a sham, that the rules established in January had been nullified in this bill. He stated that earmark reporting was changed to the majority leader and committee chairmen as opposed to the Senate Parliamentarian (who he asserted was intended to be the ‘honest broker’ working for all parties as opposed to the one in power).
His statements were followed up by the majority whip and the 180 degree contrast in statements was palpable. DiFi was claimed to be the re-establisher of ethics in D.C.
Check http://demint.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&PressRelease_id=2766d337-1321-0e36-bab5-0e096cbafda5&Month=8&Year=2007 for DeMint’s press release.
July 30th, 2007 - Washington, D.C. - U.S. Senator Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina) made following statement Monday after reviewing the new Lobbying and Ethics Bill:
“There’s a lot of smoke and mirrors in the new ethics bill, but upon a close look its obvious that earmark transparency reforms have been eviscerated. Senator Reid has given himself and a few committee chairmen the authority to determine whether congressional earmarks have been properly disclosed to the public. My office has confirmed this with the Senate Parliamentarian. Under this bill, the American people would be forced to trust Senator Reid and Senator Byrd – two of the biggest earmarkers in the Senate – to certify earmark disclosure. This bill allows the fox to guard the henhouse and makes a joke of ethics reform.”
“I will offer an amendment to this bill to restore real earmark reform, and I hope all of my colleagues will support it. The culture of earmarks is what drives the culture of corruption, and if we don’t fix the earmark rules in this bill, we will continue to have business as usual in Washington.”
“This bill is nothing more than the status quo, allowing every chairman to decide whether to disclose earmarks or not. Senator Byrd has already ‘certified’ that he is complying with disclosure now, but an independent group, Taxpayers for Common Sense, already showed that $7.5 billion in earmarks have been undisclosed. The favor factory is still open and ready for business.”
Thanks, good post! I suspect Sen. DeMint is right on the money.
They won’t pay attention to this new ethics ‘law’ they just passed any more than they pay attention to anything else. Who is going to enforce it? I’m not fooled.
>> Senate Gives Ethics Bill Final Passage
It’s all smoke, mirrors, toothpaste, and cots.
It would be nice if Bush would point out the problems publicly and then veto this phony bill. No earmarks is good government. Anything else is a scam and invites corruption.
I agree...Earmarks are so out of control they should be done away with. Murtha and many others use them to pad there campaigns (and maybe more) from the recipients of them. They’re a tool for the totally corrupt.
The bill would require lawmakers to disclose those lobbyists who raise $15,000 or more for them within a six-month period by "bundling" donations from many people. Lawmakers seeking targeted spending projects, or "earmarks," would have to publicize their plans in advance, although critics said the requirements are hardly airtight.Funny they didn't pass this *before* passing all the earmarks these past months...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1875967/posts?page=20#20
Neat. I knew the courts would come through. /sarc
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.