Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military draft should be considered: US war czar
BREITBART ^

Posted on 08/10/2007 3:52:16 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last
To: Regulator
I'm all for a draft. No reason some should get to stay behind while the brave and the poor go do the fighting.

How about the brave and the poor who will have to babysit the unwilling, degenerate, unproductive, foolish, and silly?
I for one would rather spend my time fighting the enemy. I'm no war "Czar" and that's just this 16 year (and counting) vet's opinion.

101 posted on 08/11/2007 1:25:53 AM PDT by McCloud-Strife (John McCain first, the rest of the "gang of 14" next)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Household Income of Recruits

Like their peers in 1999 and 2003, recruits in 2004 and 2005 came primarily from middle-class areas. Poor areas are proportionally underrepre­sented in the wartime years (2003–2005).


102 posted on 08/11/2007 1:58:07 AM PDT by ansel12 (Life is Exquisite, of Great Beauty Keenly Felt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
As far as drafting women is concerned, I would have to agree that it’s a slippery slope. However, ships do not care who drives them and airplanes do not care who flies them. For these tasks, it is a matter of competence and training sans some combat situations as one could imagine.

The infantry/artillery, etc. is different.

In my experience as an MTI having trained both male and female airmen, I can relate the following:

In a flight of 50 men, you will get about 5-9 % of trainees that are not worth cr*& and will never be worth anything. You do not want to be in a critical situation with these people.

In a flight of females, you get about 12 to 15% of the same.

103 posted on 08/11/2007 7:28:13 AM PDT by alarm rider (Why should I not vote my conscience?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: edweena

“I’m somewhat confused by your post. What do you mean by “volunteered for the draft”? Was he drafted, or did he volunteer because he knew he would be drafted anyway? If he volunteered because he knew he would be drafted, hoping to get some leverage by playing the system a bit, he was certainly a more strategically aware person than most, probably superior in many areas.”

Back in those days, if you were IA with no disaualifiers, you KNEW you would be drafted. If you volunteered, you got NO special assignments or training. You simply got your two years started. He could have enlisted, for three years, and received certain assignment/training opions, but did not.

Obviously he turned out to be superior. But he was a young man, somewhat struggling with life, back then. I know, I was his friend with similar problems, but a couple of years younger. His father kicked him out, he was living at grandmas, goofing off in community college.

It was one of those decisions-—”I might as well get this over.” He came hme from Basic and said “I like it—they are going to send me to Jump School.” Next came Ranger and OCS. Of course by then a person has had to re-enlist.


104 posted on 08/11/2007 12:15:32 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

I understand. Thanks for explaining. I know that there is a certain type of bright but unfocused young man who thrives on the clear expectations and rigid discipline of the military.


105 posted on 08/12/2007 9:09:55 AM PDT by edweena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso

PIck a year between now and 1980...


106 posted on 08/18/2007 3:46:41 PM PDT by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: mdefranc

No not at all. The model of conscription used in the fifties assured that for the most part, the average able bodied man served in uniform. The standards were high and a much larger proportion of Ivy League grads, NCAA athletes, etc. were serving in some form or fashion. Nobody ever executed people for refusing the draft. Typically they were jailed or offered the opportunity to serve as CO’s; most took the latter and many ended up highly decorated.


107 posted on 08/21/2007 5:44:07 AM PDT by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: alarm rider

Well, if you held men and women to the same fitness standards the majority of army females would not pass; the remainder would be in the lower quintile of performance. Our training and testing has been watered down to accomodate the gals; talk to somebody who is familiar with SERE school in the eighties and SERE school today.


108 posted on 08/21/2007 5:47:33 AM PDT by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

Well, men and women have never been held to the same fitness standard. Intelligence tests, yes.

Fitness standards all over the board have been watered down, just look at any high school now as opposed to 30 years ago.

I do not think women should be drafted, but on the other hand, there are some women that make excellent pilots and ship drivers, just as ther are men who make excellent clerks and computer programmers.


109 posted on 08/21/2007 6:01:02 AM PDT by alarm rider (Why should I not vote my conscience?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands

“I oppose a draft for the usual reasons. But it would almost be worth it to see the punk Lefties come face to face with reality. A decision they would have to make with real consequences. So sweet to see them hauled off to prison.”


You think it would be only punk lefties trying to avoid getting drafted? A deferment is a civilized way of dodging the draft, and it knows no political boundaries. How many of EITHER parties ‘best and brightest’ have their butts in the service right now? I’m talking top to bottom, Presidential Level down to the newest Congresscritter. Not many, of either party.

2 years national service, mandatory. If you want one of the skilled military jobs and training, volunteer for 4+ years. Just want to do the required 2 years and get out? There are plenty of meals to be cooked and buildings to be painted on military bases. Those jobs don’t discriminate against sex, infirmity or sexual preference, everyone gets to play. No college deferments needed, you can go to university after you serve your 2 years.


110 posted on 08/21/2007 6:12:01 AM PDT by BritExPatInFla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BritExPatInFla

“If you want one of the skilled military jobs and training, volunteer for 4+ years. Just want to do the required 2 years and get out? There are plenty of meals to be cooked and buildings to be painted on military bases.”

I’ll share what I recall from my time as an Army Personnel Specialist, FWIW.

A big component of aptitude for Infantry is IQ. You want a good infantry, you put smart people there.

Low IQ is for cooks, low/unskilled maintenance.

How do you get high IQs into the service? One way is conscription. I served during Vietnam with many college grads that got drafted.

They gave college deferments, not exemptions. (So many are so ill informed about the draft.)

The US used the draft during Civil War, WWI, WWII, Korea and Vietnam. It has been the norm, not the exception.

After 9/11/2001 it might have also made this war with islamofascists “popular.”


111 posted on 08/29/2007 1:20:25 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson