Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Fred]Thompson Leads, Democrats Close in North Carolina
Angus Reid Global Monitor ^ | August 10, 2007

Posted on 08/11/2007 8:09:35 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Fred Thompson remains the favourite United States presidential contender for Republican Party backers in the Tar Heel State, according to a poll by Public Policy Polling. 30 per cent of respondents in North Carolina would support the actor and former Tennessee senator in the 2008 primary.

Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani is second with 20 per cent, followed by former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney with 12 per cent, and Arizona senator John McCain with seven per cent.

In the sample of Democratic Party supporters, former North Carolina senator John Edwards and New York senator Hillary Rodham Clinton are tied with 29 per cent each, followed by Illinois senator Barack Obama with 23 per cent.

The Democratic presidential primary in North Carolina is tentatively scheduled for Feb. 5. The Republican contest in the Tar Heel State is expected to take place on May 6.

In 2004, Edwards won the Democratic North Carolina caucus with 52 per cent of the vote, followed by Massachusetts senator John Kerry with 27 per cent, Ohio congressman Dennis Kucinich with 12 per cent, former Vermont governor Howard Dean with six per cent, and reverend Al Sharpton with three per cent.

Incumbent president George W. Bush is ineligible for a third term in office. The next U.S. presidential election is scheduled for November 2008.

Polling Data

There will be a number of people running for president in 2008 as Republicans. Some of the most talked about are Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson. If the Republican primary were today which of these men would you vote for, or would you vote for somebody else?

Aug. 2007 Jun. 2007 May 2007

Fred Thompson 30% 37% 25%

Rudy Giuliani 20% 25% 32%

Mitt Romney 12% 14% 13%

John McCain 7% 14% 16%

In the 2008 presidential race there are three Democrats in the top tier of candidates, Hillary Rodham Clinton, John Edwards and Barack Obama. If the Democratic primary were today which of these candidates would you vote for, or would you vote for a different candidate?

Aug. 2007 Jun. 2007 May 2007

John Edwards 29% 30% 33%

Hillary Rodham Clinton 29% 26% 27%

Barack Obama 23% 22% 20%

Source: Public Policy Polling Methodology: Telephone interviews to 609 likely Republican primary voters, and 659 likely Democratic primary voters in North Carolina, conducted on Aug. 1 and Aug. 2, 2007. Margin of error is 3.8 per cent.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: Arkansas; US: Illinois; US: Massachusetts; US: New York; US: North Carolina; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008poll; barackhusseinobama; democrats; edwards; election2008; electionpresident; elections; fredthompson; giuliani; gop; hillary; hillaryclinton; johnedwards; johnmccain; mittromney; obama; polls; primaries; republicans; rudygiuliani; runfredrun; thompson; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

I hate to rain on your parade, but Fred isn’t even running.


21 posted on 08/11/2007 9:21:47 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Romney Rocks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

Politics is too complicated for that. I think of the current field, Rudy would do the best, but that’s not to say he is the only one who can beat Hilly.

I think Romney could do well, but that Mormonism causes problems for him it seems.

Honestly, I see Fred as the GOP’s Wesley Clark in that he is highly regarded and excites people before entering the race, but the bottom falls out when people get a closer look. Expect Bob Dole-like Electoral Vote counts from him in a general election, maybe cracking 200 or so.

Like I said, as it stands now, the dems win convincingly and make strong gains in the House & Senate. Who knows?


22 posted on 08/11/2007 9:22:02 AM PDT by HitmanLV ("Lord, give me chastity and temperance, but not now." - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jmyrlefuller
(Where is this support going, BTW?...)

There will be a number of people running for president in 2008 as Republicans. Some of the most talked about are Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson. If the Republican primary were today which of these men would you vote for, or would you vote for somebody else?

Aug. 2007 Jun. 2007 May 2007
Fred Thompson 30% 37% 25%
Rudy Giuliani 20% 25% 32%
Mitt Romney 12% 14% 13%
John McCain 7% 14% 16%

Yes, where is this support going....well 600 Republicans polled and in June 90% supported one of these four. But in August only 69% support one of these four. Could it be some conservatives don't like fixed polls or the media's choices on who they think is going to be President? Things not looking good for the Actor and definitely not the Suit.

23 posted on 08/11/2007 9:25:37 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
I hate to rain on your parade, but Fred isn’t even running.

We all know Romney's running. Or is he walking? Or skipping? It's hard to tell since he changes his positions so fast.

24 posted on 08/11/2007 9:26:54 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Ron Paul: Doctor. Military Captain. Constitutionalist. Patriot. Devout Christian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV
i TOTALLY disagree with your assessment of Fred's appeal based on the people i know and their interest in him-- and that spans middle America types like my family and their friends out in the heartland areas, to the savvy political circles in DC.

rudy will not get the nomination because, contrary to the belief of jaded NYers who think his dirty laundry is common knowledge to the populace, it isn't. it will be before this campaign is over and his perceived popularity will suffer for it.

25 posted on 08/11/2007 9:27:15 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

I used to think conservatives were into that rugged individualism and were not gullible. Now, I see they can be as bad as liberals. Many conservatives are blamers - blaming affirmative action for their woes, for not getting a promotion, etc. More than a few conservative men on FR are hostile to women - very negative fellas, and conservatism is supposed to be positive.

Conservatives can be as much blamers as liberals - note how some continuously blame Perot for the 1992 losses to this day, in denial over the fact that a GOP incumbent president was rejected by over 62% of the electorate - it takes a good dose of denial & imagination to think Perot caused that loss, with that many people disenchanted with the GOP.

I also find conservatives to have undefined goals in many areas, and unrealistic goals in others. That they believe their own lines wholeheartedly is strong evidence of gullibility.

Conservatives at least nominally fight that instinct that liberals embrace. But the sides are more similar than they like to admit. Conservatives can embrace victimology just as much as liberals do, but at least they nominally recognize that it’s a foolish world view.


26 posted on 08/11/2007 9:28:33 AM PDT by HitmanLV ("Lord, give me chastity and temperance, but not now." - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

I could be wrong and have adopted a wait and see attitude. I do sincerely expect Fred to underperform, but I’ve been wrong before. I think in a debate setting, he makes Hilly look quick witted, young & fresh - quite an accomplishment since she is none of the above.

Wait and see.


27 posted on 08/11/2007 9:30:02 AM PDT by HitmanLV ("Lord, give me chastity and temperance, but not now." - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: billbears

Indeed, Bill.


28 posted on 08/11/2007 9:32:32 AM PDT by jmyrlefuller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

what are their respective negatives? her’s are kind of rock-solidly in the 40% range aren’t they? i don’t expect a debate performance to turn that around. and i disagree that she would outperform him in a debate. she is shrill and pedantic at the same time.


29 posted on 08/11/2007 9:32:42 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Looks good for the unofficial candidate.

GO FRed GO!


30 posted on 08/11/2007 9:33:01 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
>>>>>I just want to know what that 7% for McCain is smoking.

The bigger question is, whats up with the that 20% supporting Rooty Toot. Must be sniffing glue or snorting rat poison. LOL Can't believe one in five NC Republicans are that liberal.

31 posted on 08/11/2007 9:38:23 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

I wouldn’t place undue faith in her negatives. In a 2-way race, which it is most likely to be, when the electorate is sour on on party, the other party directly benefits.

It’s not a race between 1 real candidate and an imaginary perfect candidate. General disdain for the GOP and a lethargic GOP candidate may be enough for Hilly to carry the day.

Frankly, I think the GOP is bottoming out, which in the long run may be a good thing. Of course, we need a long run for that to really work out. In 2002 and 2004, just about everything that could break in the direction of the GOP did break in their direction. In 2006, almost nothing did. I expect 2008 to be more like 2006 than 2002 & 2004.


32 posted on 08/11/2007 9:40:49 AM PDT by HitmanLV ("Lord, give me chastity and temperance, but not now." - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

it is certainly possible for her to win, i am not saying otherwise, but i do not think that she outshines fred in any way shape or form.


33 posted on 08/11/2007 9:43:43 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

Well, we know her pretty well and she isn’t nearly as bright as her press clippings suggest. She is no dummy, though. Her strength is that her basic fan-base isn’t very critical minded of her and that she may bring more women to the election than before and benefit from Bush fatigue and general disenchantment with the GOP.

Wait and see.


34 posted on 08/11/2007 9:47:15 AM PDT by HitmanLV ("Lord, give me chastity and temperance, but not now." - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV
I wouldn’t place undue faith in her negatives. In a 2-way race, which it is most likely to be, when the electorate is sour on on party, the other party directly benefits.

I disagree. The Clinton's track record in presidential elections is clear. The DBM will promote a third party candidate that will help the Clintons.

It happened in '92, it happened in '96 and it will happen again.

35 posted on 08/11/2007 9:56:39 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

More HuffyDuffyisms.


36 posted on 08/11/2007 10:00:23 AM PDT by b9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV
Many conservatives are blamers - blaming affirmative action for their woes, for not getting a promotion, etc...

I graduated college in 1980. All the entry level jobs in my field were advertised in the newspapers as "minority only".

Government induced affirmative action is wrong and it was common at one time. You shouldn't switch the blame for that.

37 posted on 08/11/2007 10:00:31 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

“Hope things change, and fast”

What’s the biggest political issue of the past four years?

Starts with I, ends with q.


38 posted on 08/11/2007 10:05:05 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (A leftist will never stand up like a man and admit his true beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Bump! IT'S FRED TIME!!

http://Vets4Fred.net It's time for Vets to sign up!

http://FredForPresident.com

39 posted on 08/11/2007 10:32:22 AM PDT by W04Man (I'm Now With Fred http://Vets4Fred.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

I personally am not against affirmative action in principle, though I am against how it is done in practice. In any event, I’ve spoken to conservatives who have convinced themselves that their lives have been derailed because of it.

That’s just the conservative side of the victim mentality. Each side has them.


40 posted on 08/11/2007 10:35:37 AM PDT by HitmanLV ("Lord, give me chastity and temperance, but not now." - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson