Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia’s G5 System of Air Defense Able to Counter Space Attack
Kommersant ^ | August 8, 2007 | not divulged [no author given]

Posted on 08/15/2007 10:03:29 PM PDT by Bald Eagle777

Russia’s G5 system of missile defense leaves far behind the S-400 systems that are coming into operation today. It is able to counter space attacks, said Russia’s Air Force Commander-in-Chief Col.-Gen. Alexander Zelin.

(Excerpt) Read more at kommersant.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: almazanteidesign; countermeasures; dictator; evilempire; putin; russia; russiang5; sovietunion; threats; zapperzeez
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Just maybe Zelin, or someone in his organization, might just make a mistake.
1 posted on 08/15/2007 10:03:36 PM PDT by Bald Eagle777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bald Eagle777

Yea, and that T-80 tank was such a success.


2 posted on 08/15/2007 10:06:37 PM PDT by occamrzr06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bald Eagle777
Interesting.

Hopefully it won’t get into the wrong hands before Israel and the U.S. clean house in the Middle East.

3 posted on 08/15/2007 10:07:58 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bald Eagle777

They sound much like the Iranian leadership in exaggerations about their weapons.


4 posted on 08/15/2007 10:11:42 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been, will write Duncan Hunter in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bald Eagle777

Great, now the aliens will know. Thanks, MSM.


5 posted on 08/15/2007 10:13:20 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bald Eagle777

More bs from Putin and his commie buddies.


6 posted on 08/15/2007 10:16:52 PM PDT by End Times Crusader (Ron Paul : No Constitutionalist No conservative No Republican - Kick him out of the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: occamrzr06

Exactly. I saw on TV that during the height of the cold war that the USSR only had 6 icbm capable of hitting the US. I do not believe a word they say about Ruuuuusky weaponry.


7 posted on 08/15/2007 10:30:04 PM PDT by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bald Eagle777
It's thoroughly tested too, no doubt.

When all you have to fight with is bilge water, might as well toss it and see what happens.

8 posted on 08/15/2007 10:32:16 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biff

An M-48 most likely could have torn a T-80 up, an M-60 definitely, M-1 no contest.

I don’t believe any of it either.

Scuds, Katusha’s, Quassams....how about MLRS and ATACMS.

We just need the balls to use them!


9 posted on 08/15/2007 10:38:04 PM PDT by occamrzr06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: occamrzr06

LOL

With a terminal velocity in excess 4,000 MPH, I doubt the -400 will take anything out

For fun, this is what they would see just before the flashbulb goes off

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Peacekeeper-missile-testing.jpg


10 posted on 08/15/2007 10:46:09 PM PDT by ASOC (Yeah, well, maybe - but can you *prove* it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nw_arizona_granny

Ping


11 posted on 08/15/2007 10:46:19 PM PDT by DAVEY CROCKETT (The Pigs are about to take over the barnyard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad
Great, now the aliens will know. Thanks, MSM.

lol!

12 posted on 08/15/2007 10:47:20 PM PDT by pax_et_bonum (I will always love you, Flyer.... one year ago yesterday we lost you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bald Eagle777

Well they’ve had such good luck with their subs and torpedos. Boom!


13 posted on 08/15/2007 10:52:07 PM PDT by garyhope (It's World War IV, right here, right now, courtesy of Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biff

If true it would be because we didn’t gift Russia with our space tech like we did China. We’ve learned so much over the years...


14 posted on 08/15/2007 11:14:17 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: occamrzr06

“An M-48 most likely could have torn a T-80 up”

Sure, and a F-4 would tear a Su-30 apart (pilots being equal) too, right? (sarc)


15 posted on 08/16/2007 12:02:22 AM PDT by Constantine XI Palaeologus ("Vicisti, Galilaee")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bald Eagle777
And of course we stupid Americans believe every words they utter. sarcasm
16 posted on 08/16/2007 12:04:21 AM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DAVEY CROCKETT

Bump.


17 posted on 08/16/2007 12:28:32 AM PDT by nw_arizona_granny ( Today is a good day for working on some heavy praying. The world needs God to hear them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bald Eagle777

Check out the super advanced white duct tape holding these babies together at the bottom of the photo!

18 posted on 08/16/2007 2:47:17 AM PDT by Jeff F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: occamrzr06
An M-48 most likely could have torn a T-80 up, an M-60 definitely, M-1 no contest.

Only later varients of the M-60 had a stabilized gun allowing "shoot on the move", and it was only effective at fairly low speeds. I don't think true night vision sights came out until the M1 Abrams. The M48 would have been meat on the table for a T80 in most tactical situations.

If the M60 were still a viable system, the Marines would probably still be using them -- they aren't. The Marines use their tanks somewhat differently than the Army & the M1 design reflects that. Slowly the M1 is getting things, like a telephone that allows a dismount to converse with the tank commander, a diesel generator that allows the tanks systems to be powered without the gas turbine enging engaged, etc.

19 posted on 08/16/2007 6:16:14 AM PDT by Tallguy (Climate is what you plan for, weather is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bald Eagle777

20 posted on 08/16/2007 9:48:38 AM PDT by klpt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson