Skip to comments.
'We have broken speed of light'
Telegraph ^
| 8/16/07
| Nick Fleming
Posted on 08/16/2007 10:15:43 AM PDT by LibWhacker
A pair of German physicists claim to have broken the speed of light - an achievement that would undermine our entire understanding of space and time.
According to Einstein's special theory of relativity, it would require an infinite amount of energy to propel an object at more than 186,000 miles per second.
However, Dr Gunter Nimtz and Dr Alfons Stahlhofen, of the University of Koblenz, say they may have breached a key tenet of that theory.
The pair say they have conducted an experiment in which microwave photons - energetic packets of light - travelled "instantaneously" between a pair of prisms that had been moved up to 3ft apart.
Being able to travel faster than the speed of light would lead to a wide variety of bizarre consequences.
For instance, an astronaut moving faster than it would theoretically arrive at a destination before leaving.
The scientists were investigating a phenomenon called quantum tunnelling, which allows sub-atomic particles to break apparently unbreakable laws.
Dr Nimtz told New Scientist magazine: "For the time being, this is the only violation of special relativity that I know of."
TOPICS: Germany; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alternateuniverses; broken; burnthematthestake; einstein; gettheattackdogs; grammarpolice; hisneighborswiestein; hyperdrive; koblenz; light; makeitso; mtheory; nimtz; paralleluniverses; quantummechanics; relativity; speed; stringtheory; torchesandpitchforks; warp; warpdrive; warpspeed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 351-372 next last
To: LibWhacker
2
posted on
08/16/2007 10:17:03 AM PDT
by
Post-Neolithic
(Money only makes Communists rich Communists)
To: LibWhacker
‘Spooky action at a distance’?
3
posted on
08/16/2007 10:17:09 AM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: LibWhacker
[i]Dr Nimtz told New Scientist magazine: "For the time being, this is the only violation of special relativity that I know of."[/i]
How many do you need?
4
posted on
08/16/2007 10:18:28 AM PDT
by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: LibWhacker
Well they better fix it and soon. I utilize the speed of light frequently and I’m not at all happy about this.
5
posted on
08/16/2007 10:19:04 AM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(When toilet paper is a luxury, you have achieved communism.)
To: LibWhacker
You break it you buy it. Gonna cost you a lot of c-notes.
6
posted on
08/16/2007 10:19:14 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agammemnon dead.)
To: LibWhacker
Wow! That’s almost as fast as Jesse Jackson moving to get in front of a camera.
7
posted on
08/16/2007 10:19:27 AM PDT
by
RayStacy
To: LibWhacker
According to Einstein's special theory of relativity, it would require an infinite amount of energy to propel an object at more than 186,000 miles per second. This is all bogus. You'd think that after a hundred years of staring at thia relativity thing somebody would be onto the scam. But noooo....
8
posted on
08/16/2007 10:19:45 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: SunkenCiv
9
posted on
08/16/2007 10:19:55 AM PDT
by
GoLightly
To: LibWhacker
10
posted on
08/16/2007 10:20:01 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
To: LibWhacker

Oh yeah?...well how fast can they do the Kessel run?
11
posted on
08/16/2007 10:20:14 AM PDT
by
Gator101
To: LibWhacker
The speed of light: Not just a suggestion, it’s the law.
12
posted on
08/16/2007 10:20:19 AM PDT
by
brownsfan
(America has "jumped the shark")
To: LibWhacker
For instance, an astronaut moving faster than it would theoretically arrive at a destination before leaving.From an old Zager and Evans song.
Somewhere very far away, maybe it's only yesterdaaaaaaayy.
In the year 2525, if man is still alive. If woman can survive they may fiiiiiiiiiind.
13
posted on
08/16/2007 10:20:30 AM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: LibWhacker
Dr Nimtz told New Scientist magazine: “For the time being, this is the only violation of special relativity that I know of.”
So smart yet he can’t master elementary grammar.
To: LibWhacker
15
posted on
08/16/2007 10:20:45 AM PDT
by
Roccus
(Able Danger??? What's an Able Danger???)
To: LibWhacker
16
posted on
08/16/2007 10:21:10 AM PDT
by
Eepsy
(The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
To: LibWhacker
broken the speed of light
about time
now what?
17
posted on
08/16/2007 10:21:13 AM PDT
by
Taffini
(Mr. Pippin and Mr. Waffles do not approve)
To: LibWhacker
Utterly incredible if true.
18
posted on
08/16/2007 10:21:19 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
("Todays (military's) task is three dimensional chess in the dark". General Rick Lynch in Baghdad)
To: LibWhacker
I understand they made that announcement 2 weeks from now.
19
posted on
08/16/2007 10:21:19 AM PDT
by
InvisibleChurch
(CLYBURN: Well, that would be a real big problem for us, no question about that.)
To: Post-Neolithic
Now, if we could only find some dilithium crystals...
To: LibWhacker
For instance, an astronaut moving faster than it would theoretically arrive at a destination before leaving.
Heck, I can already do that.....jump on a plane to CGO from Detroit.... I ALWAYS get there 30 minutes or so before I left......
To: LibWhacker
The only way they can do that is to also change the constants of permeability and permittivity.
22
posted on
08/16/2007 10:21:34 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: LibWhacker
I wonder the photon traveled between the two prisms or if it was in both prisms at the same time (ie, located at two places at the same time- quantum physics says this is a possibility.)
23
posted on
08/16/2007 10:21:50 AM PDT
by
mnehrling
(Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
To: LibWhacker
24
posted on
08/16/2007 10:21:52 AM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
To: LibWhacker
No.
Einstein said it.
I believe it.
Anyone saying otherwise is a ‘denier’.
25
posted on
08/16/2007 10:22:06 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
("Liberals read Karl Marx. Conservatives UNDERSTAND Karl Marx." Ronald Reagan)
To: ClearCase_guy
You break it you buy it. Gonna cost you a lot of c-notes. PRICELESS!
26
posted on
08/16/2007 10:22:13 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
("Todays (military's) task is three dimensional chess in the dark". General Rick Lynch in Baghdad)
To: MNJohnnie
To: LibWhacker
To: Roccus
On April 5, 2063 at 11:15 a.m. Zepram Cochrain made man’s first Warp Speed flight accompanied by Steppenwolf’s Magic Carpet Ride.
29
posted on
08/16/2007 10:22:36 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: kinoxi
At one time surgeons scoffed at the idea that it was a good idea to wash their hands before conducting surgery. That is the problem with only believing in what can be empirically proved.
30
posted on
08/16/2007 10:22:54 AM PDT
by
Clump
(Your family may not be safe, but at least their library records will be.)
To: LibWhacker
31
posted on
08/16/2007 10:23:00 AM PDT
by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts...)
To: RightWhale
"The other day I put instant coffee in my microwave oven ... I almost went back in time ..."
- Steven Wright
32
posted on
08/16/2007 10:23:11 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(The Democrat Party: radical Islam's last hope)
To: ClearCase_guy
E=MC-notes?........squared?...........
33
posted on
08/16/2007 10:23:54 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(All I know about Minnesota, I learned from Garrison Keilor..................)
To: RayStacy
Allow me..
Wow! Thats almost as fast as Jesse Jackson moving to get in front of a camera. TO A STACK OF MONEY.
Fixed.
34
posted on
08/16/2007 10:24:32 AM PDT
by
Dog
To: Post-Neolithic
That was my immediate thought.
“Warp 9, Mr. Data”
35
posted on
08/16/2007 10:24:42 AM PDT
by
montomike
(If you didn't find this funny or amusing...have a worldwide riot.)
To: LibWhacker
Time to get the quantum slipstream drive online and get Voyager HOME!
To: LibWhacker
Dumb question alert: why is the speed of LIGHT specifically supposedly the ceiling on speed?
37
posted on
08/16/2007 10:25:04 AM PDT
by
1L
To: mnehrling
It could be they were using an analog stopwatch.
To: ClearCase_guy
39
posted on
08/16/2007 10:25:28 AM PDT
by
null and void
(I hate to suggest something this radical, but why not let the policy follow the facts? ~ReignOfError)
To: Clump
Of course they scoffed. After all, their hands were just going to get dirty again.
40
posted on
08/16/2007 10:25:33 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
("Liberals read Karl Marx. Conservatives UNDERSTAND Karl Marx." Ronald Reagan)
To: LibWhacker
Im a physics major.
This is unbelievable...if its true. Ill believe it when i see it.
To: LibWhacker
Howard Dean may be interested in this...yeararrgh!!!
To: massgopguy
On April 5, 2063 at 11:15 a.m. Zepram Cochrain made mans first Warp Speed flight accompanied by Steppenwolfs Magic Carpet Ride. BAH! I did it in 1973 to the same music!
43
posted on
08/16/2007 10:26:53 AM PDT
by
OSHA
(Liberals will lick the boot on their necks if they think the other boot is on yours and mine.)
To: LibWhacker
“The researchers said they began their work, because they found the Autobahn too slow for them.”
Seriously, you start messing with photons and other quantum stuff, and gets weird real quick. (faster than light quick)
44
posted on
08/16/2007 10:27:29 AM PDT
by
jbwbubba
To: LibWhacker
For the time being, this is the only violation of special relativity that I know of.That, and the fact that gravity propagates at a speed that must be at least 2 * 1010 c, and may be infinite. If gravity moved at the comparatively sluggish speed of light then the Earth would spiral into the Sun.
It turns out that Einstein's theory of Special Relativity has subtle flaws* whereas (I am given to understand) Lorentz's much less famous but broadly equivalent construct for relativity works with an infinite speed of gravity.
* But don't ask me what they are! I'm leaving the thread with my fingers in my ears, lalalalala I can't hear you!
To: null and void
There was a young lady named bright
whose speed was much faster than light
she went out one day
in a relative way
and returned the previous night
46
posted on
08/16/2007 10:27:57 AM PDT
by
null and void
(I hate to suggest something this radical, but why not let the policy follow the facts? ~ReignOfError)
To: wolfinator
Do photons have mass? I didn't even know they were Catholic!
To: 1L
Relativity was devised to explain some things about electromagnetic radiation. It explains nothing about things that aren’t photons or photon related. Cerenkov radiation is an example of something of possible interest.
48
posted on
08/16/2007 10:28:30 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: wolfinator
Not measurable mass. Therefore it doesn’t seem that special relativity is violated. Like another poster has stated, quantum mechanics states that it is possible that the photon was observed in both prisms simultaneously.
Or maybe one of their clocks was off by a millisecond or so.
The real test for this will be reproducibility.
49
posted on
08/16/2007 10:28:32 AM PDT
by
AntiKev
("No damage. The world's still turning isn't it?" - Stereo Goes Stellar - Blow Me A Holloway)
To: LibWhacker
As one who earns a living off lightwave and lasers, I say “Hogwash!”
50
posted on
08/16/2007 10:28:39 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
(Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 351-372 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson