Posted on 08/17/2007 10:46:03 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
This e-wire / report ultimately makes two points:
1. The voting process at the Iowa Straw Poll was a fraud, wrapped in lies. (Whenever those running any kind of an election use police power to hide all the ballots from the people, and then announce results (?) when supposedly (?) only they have seen the ballots – those people are frauds, are acting like Stalin-esque tyrants, and their organization is a fraud.
That award goes in our current drama to the Iowa GOP leadership, namely Ted Sporer, Chuck Laudner, Mary Tiffany, Craig Robinson, and Chairman Ray Hoffman. What they did to Ron Paul and all those who paid $35 to vote in the Iowa Straw Poll, and all those who entered into a contract with them by paying $35 to support the event, is UNCONSCIONABLE!
These KGB/GESTAPO TYPES, groveling before the sinister banking powers in NYC and behind the RNC and the DNC, -- and acting as their enforcers in Iowa -- hid all the EVIDENCE (the ballots) at the Iowa Straw Poll and announced the alleged results based on their assertion alone – which the rest of us are supposed to take and believe on blind faith!
I am joined by already thousands of others in saying: WE DON’T BELIEVE YOU! You hid the evidence! You have hidden the ballots – and now you have had time to switch the ballots! You fronted for crooks, thieves, enemies of America, enemies of honest people everywhere!
The US Supreme Court has ruled twice in the last one hundred years, in U.S v Mosley (1915) and Reynolds v Sims (1964), that our right to vote includes not only the right to cast a ballot, but the right to know that our vote was counted accurately.
There is only one reason to hide the ballots from press, from candidates, and from the people – because those so hiding the ballots want to keep open the option to cheat – to rig the election.
The evidence is the BALLOTS, which should have been kept in public view all day, and counted in the presence of ALL factions, before said ballots leave the public view.
LONGEST DELAY EVER
In 1995, when the “unbelievable” tie occurred between CFR favorites Senator Bob Dole and Senator Phil Graham – the doors were locked for two solid hours after the voting ended.
As I have said for years, only the GOP leadership was behind the locked doors in 1995, and all of them supported either Dole or Graham. The published “results” that year were that Buchanan, who by far got the best reception from the crowd, came in second with about 1950 – but that Dole and Graham “tied” for first place at exactly 2501 to 2501.
MANY people were not buying it, and Robert Novak of CNN suggested the next morning that the straw poll vote had been “cooked.” (By the way, Fred Smart interviewed a person on Saturday who also gave his witness from 1995 that only Dole and Graham people were behind the locked doors in the “counting” room in 1995.)
Our strong suspicion was that Buchanan came in first in 1995, but this result was unpalatable to the Neo-Cons running the GOP in NYC and D.C. So, the Dole and Graham people wanted to place Buchanan in second place, but neither would give way to the other on first place. Thus, the almost impossible tie was agreed upon.
This year of 2007 saw the longest delay EVER – 15 minutes loger than the 1995 delay. In 2007, the Ron Paul year, -- it was 2 hours and 15 minutes before the announcement came from the podium.
THE BEST HUNCH
While we are totally devoid of evidence (the ballots), the best analysis I’ve heard is this: that probably Dr. Paul came in second to Romney who spent hundreds of thousands of $$ to bus in people.
However, this result – Ron Paul coming in second place in the 2007 Iowa Straw Poll -- was totally unpalatable to the Iowa GOP and their NYC masters and D.C. handlers. Such a result would have shown both the GOP at the state and national level, and the 5 Big TV Networks – to be liars and falsifiers of evidence up until the Iowa Straw Poll.
The World Tyranny Ruling Elite needed Paul to appear to finish near the bottom so that they could ignore him completely on the mass media. Therefore, the suspicion is that Ron Paul’s vote was partially stolen and distributed to Huckabee, Brownback, and Romney. (Tancredo would not be helped by the Iowa GOP, despite his neo-con outlook on foreign affairs, because his anti-illegal immigration stance is completely unpalatable to the Ruling Elite in NYC and D.C. who dictate to the Iowa GOP, and all other state GOPs.)
As usual in computer-generated elections – everything came up smelling like roses for the Neo-con wirepullers behind the scenes of both parties.
THE AFFIDAVITS ARE ESSENTIAL! PLEASE HELP!
2. We need the affidavits of 1306+ Iowans who voted at the straw poll for Ron Paul – in order to prove, if such is the case, that the PUBLISHED count which the Iowa GOP announced was not accurate with regard to Ron Paul’s vote. (All who actually voted are welcome to submit affidavits.)
SOME DISTURBING NUMBERS
The comprehensive published “results” will be in a future report in this series -- view them online here:
http://blog.ronpaul2008.com/ron_paul_2008/2007/08/iowa-straw-poll.html
-- but at this point the reader may want to know that the Iowa GOP claims that Romney came in first with 4516 votes, and Ron Paul came in 5th with 1305 votes.
Hear ye! Hear ye! The Ron Paul Campaign has confirmed to callers what was repeated at the event itself -- that the campaign bought and gave away 800 tickets. The “Adopt an Iowan group” (an independent effort) has published that they had collected $22,500 and purchased 643 tickets. (By the way, since the “Adopt and Iowan” page won’t allow you to copy it, I have printed it out to preserve the documentation.)
So now we are being asked to believe that Ron Paul got less votes (1305) than the tickets purchased by the campaign and the “Adopt an Iowan” campaign (totally 1443) – and that NO ONE in Iowa came on their own to pay $35 and vote for Ron Paul !!!!!
The Ron Paul Campaign AND the Adopt an Iowan campaign kept track of who the tickets were given to (I hope). This is enough affidavits to prove that the announced Diebold “count” was wrong. – And we want to find as many other Iowa citizens as possible who paid $35 out of their own pocket to vote – so we can get their affidavits also.
This seems to be a smoking gun. This will be the greatest and most irrefutable proof ever that a Diebold computer was used to rig an election!
We need the affidavits of any Iowan who voted for Ron Paul at the Ames, Iowa Straw Poll. If we succeed – then we will have the proof that the Diebold computers at the Iowa Straw Poll of 2007 – were rigged.
If you voted in the Iowa Straw Poll on August 11, 2007 – and if you need an affidavit to make sure your vote counts, and especially if you want to help us prove whether or not the result published for Ron Paul was accurate – you can go to:
www.votefraud.org/iowa_straw_poll_2007_report_affidavit_part1.htm
At the top and bottom of that article is a link to the relevant affidavit. Simply right click on the link, use “Save target as” and save the word document to your computer where you can find it. You will then have an affidavit to fill out, and get notarized at a bank, Kinkos, etc., and to mail back to us.
A number of affidavits are already in hand.
End of this e-wire.
Jim Condit Jr.
Oh, this is just too good. ;)
Translation: The JOOOOOS did it
Some Congress critters are in need of straight jackets. You know who I’d start with.
In fact, at Mr. Condit's website Real News 24/7, the very first article is titled "1. THE TRUTH ABOUT THE 9-11 TERROR ATTACKS", in which he asserts:
The evidence indicates that 9-11 was an inside job, using Remote Controlled Airplanes and demolition bombs in the World Trade Towers (see the online documentary 911Mysteries -- the online version is here in three parts ), pulled off by traitorous elements within the US military that are loyal to the nation usurping the name "Israel" and to the worldwide Jewish Supremacist / Freemasonic financial Network. The purpose was -- and remains -- to initiate World War III by tricking Americans into supporting an series of attacks on the Arab world, to then keep US troops in the Mideast dying to protect Israel for the next generation, while the agenda for tyrannical Judeo-Masonic World Tyranny is pushed forward."
Paul supporters, please tell me this guy doesn't represent your opinion.
Face it, Dr. Paul has gone around the bend. He may have been OK a few years ago, but no longer.
that is a pretty poor analysis. if your looking for a better analysis of his voting record see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul
I had a big ol' Bass Ale earlier and it was great! I'm loving being in the real world for a couple of weeks. The weather is so COOL...none of this 125 F stuff. Yeeeeehaaaaaa!
My sister is coming into London-town tomorrow and we're going to do some damage.
How are you doing? OK?
Maybe later I’ll update the Wikipedia article with the OnTheIssues vote tracking.. that should help.. :->
I arrived in London earlier today. I can get just about anything here.
I'm still reveling in being FREE to go out and about...something I can't do in the "I"-place. ;-)
The straw poll in illinois gave Dr Paul some pretty good results:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1882413/posts
“I think because it is so close to Iowa’s straw poll that one more activity about a straw poll and preference for president — I think it will resonate with the public,” said Senator Dan Rutherford.
No matter what the opinion is, it didn’t stop hundreds of people from pouring in to Springfield on a rainy day.
Here are the final poll results:
1. Mitt Romney — 40.35%
2. Fred Thompson — 19.96%
3. Ron Paul — 18.87%
4. Rudy Giuliani — 11.61%
5. John McCain — 4.12%
6. Mike Huckabee — 3.04%
7. Sam Brownback — 1.08%
8. Duncan Hunter — .65%
9. Tom Tancredo — .33%
Again, there what is? What is "it"?
I've been asking that for weeks, ever since I found that he is advertised as a columnist for the American Free Press (successor to the Spotlight, Willis Carto, Institute of Historical Review, Barnes Review, former Liberty Lobby; fair to say at the heart of Holocaust denial and white supremacy). The only answer I get is that anyone can publish his column in print as he doesn't copyright it. And presumably advertise him as a columnist. While it may not be a reflection of Paul's views, I think it's fair to say that aside from truthers, he's OK with support from haters.
Well, that certainly isn't a denunciation. It basically says that Ron Paul does not plan on being a party to the lawsuit.
I assume that you will do the same.
Ron Paul stated:
"Everyone wants an honest election so if there's a question, this is the time the question should be asked."
This statement was made the exact same day as your source saying that he would not be a party to a lawsuit.
Put side by side, this shows that Ron Paul says that these "questions should be asked" but that he won't be officially asking them in court.
Clearly he is encouraging others to bring the suits as long as he doesn't actually have to put his name on it.
“Paul supporters, please tell me this guy doesn’t represent your opinion.”
It doesn’t represent Paul’s either:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaFMi-O6AaE
Netiquette tip #18: Making a big deal about minor grammatical issues in the writings of someone you are debating makes you look like a moron who has no strong arguments of your own.
Pragmatism is what bridges the gulf between Jeffersonian ideals and Hamilton's get it done approach.
The founders knew their limits, knew time would change and that certain things would be in the purview of the “Federal Government” They entrusted future generations to act with the Constitution in one hand and common sense in the other. The perfect mix is somewhere between then and what we have now, neither position pure in its form or execution.
*(not accurate I dont hate him at all, just fear he is overly naive about 21st threats and business)
Below - "specific questions?"
"Now.....can we actually consider what Paul believes on the issues?"
I took no detour....I told you straight out I was here for the fun.
You've got others to get into a good tangle with here. Again, I'm here for entertainment purposes only.
Enjoy! :-)
Have a great vacation. You deserve it!
No, the rain didn't stop those determined people at all.
Then again, there were an average of over 70,000 people a day attending the fair.
More accurate to say the rain didn't stop 1 or 2 percent of the attendees from pouring into the straw poll tent to vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.