Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush holds 'war council' in Iraq
BBC ^ | Monday, 3 September 2007, 18:40 GMT 19:40 UK | BBC Staff

Posted on 09/03/2007 11:53:23 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Bush holds 'war council' in Iraq

President George W Bush greets troops

Mr Bush is facing intense debate over his troop surge strategy

US President George W Bush has met senior US and Iraqi officials at a US air base in Anbar province in Iraq.

The talks at al-Asad air base were attended by the US secretary of state, defence secretary, the US ambassador to Iraq and the head of US forces there.

They were joined by Iraq's PM Nouri Maliki and other senior Iraqis.

Mr Bush is facing pressure at home for a US withdrawal, but he insisted any pull out will only result from a "calm assessment" by leaders on the ground.

This is the last big gathering of the president's military advisers and the Iraqi leadership before the president decides on the way forward

Geoff Morrell
Pentagon spokesman

"Those decisions will be based on a calm assessment by our military commanders on the conditions on the ground, not a nervous reaction by Washington politicians to poll results in the media," said Mr Bush, addressing troops at the base on the US Labor Day holiday.

"In other words when we begin to draw down troops from Iraq it will be from a position of strength and success, not from a position of fear and failure."

White House 'anger'

Speaking to reporters earlier, Mr Bush said his top officials had advised him that if current successes continue, security levels could be maintained with fewer troops.

However, he made no specific reference to how much troop numbers could be cut or any possible timetable for withdrawal, adding: "America does not abandon its friends. America will not abandon the Iraqi people".

The BBC's Matt Frei in Washington says the comment could have been a reference to UK forces who on the same day that Mr Bush was visiting Anbar withdrew their last troops from inside the southern city of Basra.

A total of 5,550 UK troops are now located at the airport outside Basra and their Basra Palace base is under Iraqi control.

map

Although the Bush administration has not publicly criticised the British, our correspondent says that in private officials are annoyed and say the move is not good for a White House which feels increasingly isolated.

The meeting in Anbar, which a Pentagon official called a "war council", comes just days before a key report on how Mr Bush's surge strategy is faring.

On 10 and 11 September, the head of US forces in Iraq, General David Petraeus, and the US ambassador, Ryan Crocker, are due to report to Congress on the situation in Iraq, focusing particularly on the effect of the surge, which reached full levels in June.

Secrecy

The president was accompanied on his visit by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and the US national security adviser, Steven Hadley.

US Defence Secretary Robert Gates arrived ahead of Mr Bush for talks with senior US officials including Gen Petraeus and Mr Crocker.

"This is the last big gathering of the president's military advisers and the Iraqi leadership before the president decides on the way forward," Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said.

Nouri Maliki
Mr Maliki travelled to Anbar for just the third time since taking office

"This is very much a decisional meeting. This meeting will put him much closer to a decision if he hasn't made one yet."

In an extraordinary move, Iraq's senior leaders, including Prime Minister Maliki and President Jalal Talabani, travelled to Anbar to meet Mr Bush.

For Mr Maliki, a Shia, it was only his third visit to the Sunni-dominated province.

The last time Mr Bush was in Iraq was more than a year ago. Now, as then, the surprise trip was shrouded in secrecy because of the ongoing instability.

He stopped unannounced on board Air Force One en route to a summit of Asia-Pacific leaders in Australia and remained on the heavily protected air base for the duration of his visit.

The BBC's Hugh Sykes, in Baghdad, says Mr Bush's decision to land in Anbar province is significant. Anbar, west of Baghdad, has often been referred to as the centre of the Sunni insurgency, but the US now believes it has greatly reduced the threat from Sunni Arab militant groups, such as al-Qaeda in Iraq, our correspondent says.

Several imams have been killed for supporting US-led forces and preaching against al-Qaeda in Iraq at Friday prayers, and many local tribes have turned against the insurgents, he adds.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; cic; iraq; iraqwar; maliki; nationalsecurity; progress; surprise; warcouncil

1 posted on 09/03/2007 11:53:25 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

my next door neighbor, a leftist union tv-moron, was foaming

at the mouth about bush this morning.


2 posted on 09/03/2007 11:54:45 AM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21
There is a thread about the Lefties foaming over the visit...:

Bush Visits Iraq, Lefties Go Nuts

I posted this to get the BBC view,...since the Brits are abandoning Southern Iraq....

3 posted on 09/03/2007 12:00:24 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Scary-quotes, "war council".

Puh-leeze.

-Joan

4 posted on 09/03/2007 12:04:13 PM PDT by JoanVarga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

How about working up the courage to JDAM Mookie Sadr once and for all.

That would impress me.


5 posted on 09/03/2007 12:04:42 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The location of this war council tells alot about how the war is progressing. In January, if someone had predicted that Bush would be holding a war council in Anbar Province before the year was out, they would have outed themself as being a wingnut.


6 posted on 09/03/2007 12:07:18 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender; NormsRevenge; Marine_Uncle; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; SandRat; blam; SunkenCiv; ...

That location might be a hidden message for Malicki and the Shia’s running the current government also!


7 posted on 09/03/2007 12:16:42 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Personally, I think the criticism of Malicki has been a little bit unfair. The Sunnis were the ones who started the insurgency and it was asking alot of the Shiites to hold their responsive fire, which they did until Al Qaeda blew up the Golden Mosque. After that the Sunnis got a little taste of what might happen if they kept pushing the Shiites. So if we are going to point fingers, they should largely be pointed at the Sunnis, who killed tens of thousands of Shiites in the years leading up to the war - and didn’t stop afterwards.


8 posted on 09/03/2007 12:26:57 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

“War-Council” makes me think of Iran.


9 posted on 09/03/2007 12:31:01 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy

Could be....Stopping Terror sponsoring states would certainly include Iran,....and Syria...North Korea seems to be changing it’s tune....


10 posted on 09/03/2007 12:33:37 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
Sunnis, who killed tens of thousands of Shiites in the years leading up to the war

Make that hundreds of thousands (if not millions).

You are right with your asessment. However folks are also rightfully p*ssed off because sole Shia dominance means Iranian supremacy (as long as the Iranian regime is still in place). Without the Iranian regime in the saddle things would look quite different.

The situation in Iraq can never be properly solved as long as the Mullahs in Iran are given a free hand.

Most of the Iraqi Sunnis now have joined our side and for the sake of their nation the Shias have to compromise aswell.

11 posted on 09/03/2007 12:35:30 PM PDT by SolidWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JoanVarga

Well....it is the BBC...and they like clever spinning of the news.


12 posted on 09/03/2007 12:36:12 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy
The term 'War Council' makes me think of these guys:


13 posted on 09/03/2007 12:44:28 PM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

I think the marginalization of Al Sadr is the best indication that Iran’s stooges in Iraq are not being given a free hand. In fact, I would say that Al Sadr’s recent stand-down of his militia shows that Al Sadr has learned the lesson that has already been taught to Al Qaeda — namely, if you act like mindless thugs, you run the risk of the townspeople rising up and treating you to a necktie party.


14 posted on 09/03/2007 12:46:16 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I made it my business to catch CNN’s take on his speech. All they focused on was his brief mention of troop-reductions... about 1% of his whole text.


15 posted on 09/03/2007 1:15:17 PM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoanVarga
See this...Military source using the term:

President Assembles 'War Council' in Anbar Province

16 posted on 09/03/2007 2:42:58 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"The term 'War Council' makes me think of these guys:"

Would like it to make me think of these guys:


17 posted on 09/03/2007 4:50:06 PM PDT by Salem (What can men do against such reckless hate? ... Ride out with me. Ride out and meet them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...

Thanks Ernest.

Iraqi forces pledge to keep the peace in Basra as British military moves out
The Times (London) | 04SEP07 | Martin Fletcher in Baghdad (where it’s safer)
Posted on 09/03/2007 4:45:56 PM EDT by familyop
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1890617/posts


18 posted on 09/03/2007 6:13:49 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Wednesday, August 29, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
You could be right. However let us be reminded that al-Asad is crawling with Marines. That is their HQ for al Anbar operations. And the flight line and landing (LSL Zone) would be very safe.
But as you hint, it forced Maliki to come up to al Anbar for a visit.
19 posted on 09/03/2007 6:57:56 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson