Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Does Fox News Hate Ron Paul?
AOL News ^ | Sep 7th 2007 | Jeff Hoard

Posted on 09/07/2007 1:07:39 PM PDT by NapkinUser

Edited on 09/07/2007 2:33:06 PM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]

Fox News moderators in the debate accused Paul of taking "Marching orders from Al Qaeda." Arguably the worst moderating I have seen, as Paul ends up having to debate the moderators?!?

During this debate season, Fox News decided to add "cell phone voting" to the post-debate analysis. After the first debate, Ron Paul won the cell phone vote, much to the displeasure of the Fox News pundits (youtube video from that debate here.)

The second Fox News debate was no different. Pundits Hannity and Colmes assure the audience that Ron Paul is winning the poll simply because people are redialing. What is the point of having a poll if people are able to abuse it? Ron Paul supporters, a bit tired of being beaten down by the media, put together this video to debunk the Hannity and Colmes "redialing theory."

Click here to watch the video

I am curious to know if Fox News viewers would like to see each candidate treated fairly, or if they prefer that the newscasters go as far as lying to make some candidates look worse than others.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 911truther; gopprimaries; greenieweenies; howtoirritatepeople; losertarian; moonbats; nutburger; paul; rino; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last
To: cva66snipe
From Ron Paul Privacy and Personal Liberty

The biggest threat to your privacy is the government. We must drastically limit the ability of government to collect and store data regarding citizens’ personal matters.

We must stop the move toward a national ID card system. All states are preparing to issue new driver’s licenses embedded with “standard identifier” data — a national ID. A national ID with new tracking technologies means we’re heading into an Orwellian world of no privacy. I voted against the Real ID Act in March of 2005.

To date, the privacy focus has been on identity theft. It was Congress that created this danger by mandating use of the standard identifier (currently your SSN) in the private sector. For example, banks use SSNs as customer account identifiers because the government requires it.

We must also protect medical privacy. Right now, you’re vulnerable. Under so-called “medical privacy protection” rules, insurance companies and other entities have access to your personal medical information.

Financial privacy? Right now depositing $10,000 or more in cash in your local bank account will generate a federally-mandated report to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network at the United States Department of the Treasury.

And then there’s the so-called Patriot Act. As originally proposed, it:


* Expanded the federal government's ability to use wiretaps without judicial oversight;
* Allowed nationwide search warrants non-specific to any given location, nor subject to any local judicial oversight;
* Made it far easier for the government to monitor private internet usage;
* Authorized “sneak and peek” warrants enabling federal authorities to search a person’s home, office, or personal property without that person’s knowledge; and
* Required libraries and bookstores to turn over records of books read by their patrons.

I have fought this fight for many years. I sponsored a bill to overturn the Patriot Act and have won some victories, but today the threat to your liberty and privacy is very real. We need leadership at the top that will prevent Washington from centralizing power and private data about our lives.

Now I ask what is not Conservative about any of this Ron Paul stands for? I support what was stated as his polices in my last three post. I seen no good reason as a Conservative not to.

141 posted on 09/08/2007 1:09:48 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: lormand
I wish I could remember this thread/post...
I guess you have no idea of how to use the "Bookmark" function?
142 posted on 09/08/2007 1:41:08 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
Ron Paul represents west Texas...

http://www.house.gov/paul/about14.htm
The 14th Congressional District of Texas stretches from the Gulf Coast south of Houston almost to Corpus Christi; north through Victoria and west close to San Antonio; extending north to Hays county near Austin. From Hays county, the District stretches east to Fayette and Colorado counties, south through Wharton county, and back to the Gulf through the lower half of Brazoria county. In all, the district encompasses more than 22,000 square miles.

I can only reply...DOH!

143 posted on 09/08/2007 1:53:59 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
I grew up 18 years in El Paso. I know of what I speak.
Now THAT is rich! You don't even know where the 14th Congressional District of Texas even is apparently!
144 posted on 09/08/2007 1:57:45 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
I thought he was west texas.
It's so much easier to demagogue than check and know, isn't it.
145 posted on 09/08/2007 2:24:17 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

what can I say. flay away if it suits ya. You think Ron Paul’s good for the Republican party right here?


146 posted on 09/08/2007 6:39:09 AM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
what can I say.
You can say whatever you want. Whether what you say is accurate or not seems to be the problem. If what you had stated was simply an opinion you probably wouldn't have heard from me at all. You stated something as a fact that was wrong. You do have my apologies for "piling on" though. I didn't realize that others had already corrected you.
flay away if it suits ya.
Been there, done that.
You think Ron Paul’s good for the Republican party right here?
Where's "right here"? I can't understand just what it is you're asking.
147 posted on 09/08/2007 6:54:22 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

right here in the middle of this war. is he doing a good job? or is he a lousy nevermind?


148 posted on 09/08/2007 7:03:56 AM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
right here in the middle of this war. is he doing a good job?
I didn't know that he had a job in this war. I thought that waging war was a soldier's job. Just what "job" is it that you believe he has in this "war"?

or is he a lousy nevermind?
I have no idea what a "lousy nevermind" is so I can't comment.

149 posted on 09/08/2007 7:13:05 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

you don’t have much of an opinion. correction nazi. tut tut.


150 posted on 09/08/2007 7:16:20 AM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
you don’t have much of an opinion.
I have plenty of opinion. Hell, I've even got something of a reputation among some FReepers of having too much opinion and I should never express it!
Furthermore, you've yet to ask something in a manner in which I can give you an opinion.
correction nazi.
Well isn't that cute! You can call people names.
tut tut
Tsk, tsk.
151 posted on 09/08/2007 7:43:58 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

I’ll burn a few keystrokes simply to say that Ron Paul has about as much of a chance to be POTUS as I do.


152 posted on 09/08/2007 7:57:22 AM PDT by Recovering Hermit (There's another old saying Senator..."Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
There were other candidates on that stage besides Wudy, Johnny {Wudy's big Buddy now}, and Mitt that others including myself wanted to hear. FAUX NEWS failed to be unbiased and highly showed favoritism to those three.

Exactly.

While I don't care for Ron Paul, Fox News and any other NYC MSM outlets are nothing but Madison Avenue limousine liberals...

I won't vote for Ruby Julie-Annie in the general election, they can have their deserved defeat. I don't have to help them.

I don't like the illegals, the perverts, the dopers, the gun grabbers or the baby killers. I am voting on the issues.

153 posted on 09/08/2007 8:00:15 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

“A Traditional Non-Intervention Foreign Policy”
11 a.m. to Noon - Kenney Auditorium, Nitze Building
Ron Paul, Republican congressman and 2008 presidential candidate, will discuss this topic. For more information and to RSVP, contact cpfr@jhu.edu or 202.587.3237. Media who want to cover this event should register with Felisa Neuringer Klubes in the SAIS Communications Office at 202.663.5626 or fklubes@jhu.edu.

http://apps.sais-jhu.edu/insider/this_week_calendar.php#20070911

SAIS is one of the most prestigious American schools for international studies. The website describes the school as follows:

“The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) in Washington, D.C., is a leading graduate school of international affairs, educating students for professional careers in government, business, journalism, international law and non-profit organizations. Founded in 1943 by Paul Nitze and Christian Herter, SAIS has been a division of The Johns Hopkins University since 1950.”


154 posted on 09/08/2007 9:13:32 AM PDT by B4Ranch ("Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser; ejonesie22; Allegra; Admin Moderator; Lead Moderator; jimrob; Las Vegas Ron; ...
Everyone.
The Ron Paul threads are a complete trip, some of the best fun on Free Republic, but I am wondering, are we only putting embers on the the so called Ron Paul fire.

In my opinion, Ron Paul is like an internet hoax, it stays alive the more you pass it along. Paul’s newest tactic is the signs and slogans ‘Google Ron Paul’.. Every time we have a 800 post debate thread with Paul supporters only puts Ron Paul higher in Google analytics.

We know that the Paul supporters won’t be swayed, and they know we won’t be swayed. We are repeating the same things over and over.. and all this is doing is giving this third tier candidate far more attention than he deserves.

Why not crickets whenever Paul pops up here? Look what happened to all the pro-Rudy threads, they died out because all they were fed was the sound of crickets.

Why not just stop feeding the fire? Let it burn out.

That’s just my thought... I’m sure others have differing opinions.

155 posted on 09/08/2007 10:29:35 AM PDT by mnehring (Please, don't feed the trolls, it only empowers them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
See post 431 here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1892669/posts?page=432#432
156 posted on 09/08/2007 10:35:24 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

Ping #155


157 posted on 09/08/2007 10:45:56 AM PDT by mnehring (Please, don't feed the trolls, it only empowers them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
I don’t disagree with your logic. The problem is that many, if not most, of the posters on FR can’t stay away from a political argument. It is like the moth to a flame. So I guess I am saying that to some extent we are getting sucked in. I agree that we should stop feeding their flames but damned if I can control myself.
158 posted on 09/08/2007 11:54:00 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (RON PAUL: "It will be a little bit better now with the democrats now in charge of oversight ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Why not crickets whenever Paul pops up here? Look what happened to all the pro-Rudy threads, they died out because all they were fed was the sound of crickets.

Why not just stop feeding the fire? Let it burn out.

You make a good point.

But the Paul threads are so much fun.

I don't have many entertainment options where I live. Paul threads are great entertainment and for such a reasonable price.

But if we decide as a group to do the crickets chirping stance, I'll unite with the rest of you.

159 posted on 09/08/2007 11:55:04 AM PDT by Allegra (Turning Vanity Threads Into New Socks Threads at Every Opportunity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
The Ron Paul threads are a complete trip, some of the best fun on Free Republic, but I am wondering, are we only putting embers on the the so called Ron Paul fire.

Blessed are the peacemakers. LOL.

This is pretty darned funny, coming from one of the primary Paul-haters. What's wrong, the ol' lynch mob just isn't as much fun these days?

Never mind, soon all the True Republicans will find another conservative to hate and abuse. It's a very familiar pattern. You people have a short attention span and a lot of hatred to vent.
160 posted on 09/08/2007 1:16:08 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson