Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why No Righty Kos? (More Navel Gazing and Free Republic Bashing)
TownHall.com ^ | Saturday, September 8, 2007 | Patrick Ruffini

Posted on 09/08/2007 5:16:05 AM PDT by kristinn

Liberaltarian ex-Daily Kos diarist David Weigel and Newsbusters are engaged in a debate over why there is no right-wing Daily Kos.

My answer, as articulated here is that there is a conservative Daily Kos, that’s it’s Free Republic, but that it doesn’t really “count” since it’s not a blog, and more critically, it won’t play nicely with the rest of the movement and it doesn’t worship candidates like Kos does.

There are vast architectural differences between FR and Kos, as critics of this comparison are wont to point out. Most of them are points in Kos’s favor. But fundamentally they were founded to fill the same gap. At the end of the day, they are both vast communities for mid-level activists. Though Kos is more blog-based and tolerant of editorializing, Weigel is perceptive enough to distinguish it from “a blog” a la Power Line or HughHewitt.com, in which the voice of the blogger dominates and others comment (or don’t, in the case of some big conservative bloggers). Daily Kos is simply a different beast than anything else in the liberal blogosphere, in much the same way that Free Republic is a different beast than anything else in the conservative blogosphere. But in terms of traffic and community, it’s still the biggest. The same item that will get a handful of comments at my personal blog and 30 to 40 on HughHewitt.com, will get upwards of 100 responses when posted to Free Republic. FR may be primitive in its architecture, but I don’t think it can be ipso facto excluded from discussions about the size and extent of conservative community online, for the sheer fact of its size.

Part of the reason that there is no “conservative Daily Kos” is that the broader conservative movement isn’t really lacking for a huge online community in the same way the left was in 2002 (DU was, and is, a joke). That community may not be the healthiest one around, but it’s still a community.

The second fact is that conservative blogs, excluding Free Republic/Lucianne/etc. for a moment, serve a fundamentally different audience than the netroots. They’re more elite, focused on policy, and interested in the execution of the war. What was going on when conservative blogs first boomed? 9/11 and the American response to it. And discussions of the size of the conservative blogosphere (strictly defined) should take into account the fact that there are only so many people who can digest the kind of almost-scholarly analysis that happens in places like Power Line, Captain’s Quarters, and Red State. The conservative blogosphere today is what the liberal blogosphere would have been if elite bloggers like Kevin Drum and Matthew Yglesias had remained the dominant voices.

This is not meant to be self-congratulatory. In fact, I think it’s probably a serious limitation in the size of our blogosphere, to the extent that’s a concern. If you want to be bigger, you’re not necessarily going to like the people you have to let in to make it happen. If and when that were to happen, the elite flavor of many leading conservative blogs today would give way to more freewheeling Daily Kos and Free Republic-like sites and comment areas.

I think it’s probably worth paying that price if we can get people acting like true activists. Conservatives have paid a price for being inattentive to candidate recruitment and what’s actually going on at the county committee level. In effect, we allowed the unchecked rise of machine operators like Duke Cunningham, Bob Ney, and John Doolittle who sacrificed conservative principle for back-scratching enrichment. One of the big reasons why Larry Craig won’t be missed is that he was uninspiring career politician (and porker) with no discernible ideological moorings (beyond the political leanings of his state). It’s those kinds of machine pols that always seem to the problem, and we let them flourish by being pundits on the sidelines.

I also think conservative blogosphere has misread the marketplace. To make a crass overgeneralization here, policy is boring and politics is interesting. By blogging about policy, you choose to be boring (and that’s ok). There is probably a much bigger marketplace for people focused on elections, especially in even numbered years. (And this is Kos’s primary purpose.) Why is it that we start talking about Presidential elections two years ahead of time? Because it sells newspapers. The blogosphere overall is stagnating, but if you want to start a new blog that will get read, your best bet is 1) obsessively cover 2008 and be good at it, and 2) fill a niche, especially one covering local politics.

The ‘08 blogs like Race 4 2008 and Eye on ‘08 will probably be in five figures in daily traffic by early next year. To give you a sense of the insane community that is building around a focused group blog like Race, take a look at their 700 comment thread during the debate. There is a market there. And a lot of passion too.

So let’s follow it.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Free Republic; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fr; freerepublic; kos; newmedia; ruffini; weblogs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
Ay carumba......Sorry to post and run again, but I'm off to do some more activism this morning so that all the other conservatives coming to the Gathering of Eagles next weekend will feel like we 'play nicely' with them.
1 posted on 09/08/2007 5:16:07 AM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kristinn
No conservative Kos? Please. We own the Internet.
2 posted on 09/08/2007 5:17:34 AM PDT by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Ruffini really has a **** ** for FR, doesn’t he?


3 posted on 09/08/2007 5:18:49 AM PDT by sauropod (You canít spell crap without the AP in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
FR may be primitive in its architecture

Primitive? Hmph! So even a caveman could figure it out, I suppose?
4 posted on 09/08/2007 5:23:09 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia (You know a liberal has lost the argument when he calls you a Nazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I find this Patrick Ruffini boring, and hardly worth mention.


5 posted on 09/08/2007 5:24:21 AM PDT by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Isn’t Ruffini a Rudybot?


6 posted on 09/08/2007 5:29:33 AM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1 Olgoat; 103198; 10Ring; 11Bush; 1stbn27; 2ndClassCitizen; 2SterlingConservatives; 2yearlurker; ...

DC Chapter ping


7 posted on 09/08/2007 5:30:55 AM PDT by BufordP (Had Mexicans flown planes into the World Trade Center, Jorge Bush would have surrendered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

I am not sure... but that would be a sound guess based on the content of this piece.

He can dis FR, but it still won’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear! That being Rooty, of course.


8 posted on 09/08/2007 5:32:27 AM PDT by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Primitive?!!? I LOVE this structure - it is easy to follow conversations and comments to comments. When they're all just stacked in order that they were posted with no link between them, it's very hard to track the conversations.

FR has the best format on the web!

9 posted on 09/08/2007 5:36:37 AM PDT by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SW6906

Dan Rather wishes FR didn’t exist when his falsehoods were uncovered. I personally think that FR is frontline with news and commentary that means something.


10 posted on 09/08/2007 5:42:37 AM PDT by Thebaddog (My dogs are asleep paws up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Absolutely! Everyone knows we should do mindless activism and not policy; i.e., engage in serious thinking about issues and the world. /sarc
11 posted on 09/08/2007 5:43:08 AM PDT by Stepan12 ( "We are all girlymen now." Conservative reaction to Ann Coulter's anti PC joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

“To give you a sense of the insane community that is building around a focused group blog like Race, take a look at their 700 comment thread during the debate.”

Written by a man who seems to be unaware our thread with a pantload more than 700 comments (2132 to be precise).


12 posted on 09/08/2007 5:44:53 AM PDT by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Wonder how many times Ruffini has been banned.


13 posted on 09/08/2007 5:45:08 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SW6906

Oh, I very much agree!
And there’ no CLUTTER on the screen...ads, avatars, etc...just the occasional and necessary pictures posted by members. I love this place.
Plus, (not that I use mine much), but we each get our own home-page and there’s FReepmail. We can post with HTML code - or not. I don’t know, but do the other places offer that?
FReeRepublic’s got it going on.


14 posted on 09/08/2007 5:54:43 AM PDT by babyfreep ( Duncan Hunter Fan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Why no righty Kos? Cuz we're not foul-mouthed enough...?

"Seven words you can never say on television"... but which are said on the Internet. A lot.

15 posted on 09/08/2007 5:55:15 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SW6906

It also loads and operates quickly, something that is immediately noticeable when used by those with a dial-up connection or mobile cellular device. There are some interesting sites out there political and otherwise, but the content is just sometimes shoot-yerself sloow, when all we’re really interested in is *text*. Pre-www, many sites were simple and quick to use, now they are memory-hogs that do little to add in the way of content or utility.

Google to their credit, haven’t messed up a good thing.


16 posted on 09/08/2007 5:57:12 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SW6906
When they're all just stacked in order that they were posted with no link between them, it's very hard to track the conversations.

Absolutely! It's the best I've seen. On most of the boards you have no idea who is replying to whom. Here, there is not doubt. And to be able to link back the the original post or to all replies is great! Most of the other boards just aggravate me.

17 posted on 09/08/2007 5:57:40 AM PDT by CaptRon (Pedicaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
Primitive? Hmph! So even a caveman could figure it out, I suppose?

The "primitive" (I would use the term "user-friendly") architecture gives FR a great advantage over the blogs. It allows the membership here to be MUCH more interactive and collaborative than elsewhere - creating a "sum is greater than the parts of the whole" situation.

The problem with blogs is that they tend to be centered on either the one person (kos) or the select few people (mydd) who are actually posting material/articles, and there generally isn't a lot of interaction between those who post responses.

kos, etc are more like the kids on campus that would stand up on soapboxes reading political statements and manifesto to a small crowd. FR is like a bunch of people sitting around a table working to hash something out. The result is that FR can produce better and faster analyses than kos could ever hope to.
18 posted on 09/08/2007 5:59:13 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SW6906

I didn’t take “primitive” as being a dis. I think he meant it as this site has a very basic architecture for hosting our format. Sometimes the simplest way is the best.


19 posted on 09/08/2007 5:59:18 AM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

RIGHT-—
Libertypost.org 157,700
Lucianne.com 299,600
Libertyforum.org 132,800
Clownposse.org 010,300
Littlegreenfootballs.com 603,400
Freerepublic.com 1,308,300

LEFT-—
Democraticunderground.com 792,600
Dailykos.com 2,048,900

Alexa has freerepublic ranked at 7784, DailyKos ranked at 4720 and DU ranked at 11,109.


20 posted on 09/08/2007 6:06:36 AM PDT by Nephi ( $100m ante is a symptom of the old media... the Ron Paul Revolution is the new media's choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson