Posted on 10/06/2007 8:23:17 PM PDT by Josh Painter
I was pinging all those folks to your little circus act. “Look, a live one! An actual moonbat in captivity.”
Poor L.Ron’s idea of “substance to add” is his tragically inadequate understanding of the Constitution; his goldbuggery; Blame-America-First wizardry; talking points that attract swarms of leftists and Sturmfronters; and hate of Israel balanced only by his obsequious affinity for Ahmadinejad.
You are a laughingstock.
LoL! well, at least the good Lord has shone a light in that dark place and made you see. Better late than never.
I’m really tempted to disparage the poll’s French origins out of habit, but the French are our friends again for the moment so reluntantly I’ll pass on the temptation.
Still doesn’t mean I’m a big believer in this polling unit. Good polls are Rass, Mason Dixon, even battleground I’d accept. Even so? I never expect conservative principles or candidates that are the choice of conservatives to do well in THIS polling company so I’m pleasantly surprised he’s relatively close.
Well, depending on when you sent him money, you might be able to request to have it returned. You might check into that.
Paul is still more conservative than most on the list and in terms of largess of the gov’t is bar none the best. We could do a LOT worse than put Paul in there (Rudy, Mitt, & McCain & Bush come to mind) despite his extreme isolationist stance. I will tell you what, I’ve NEVER seen the mainstream Republican party so afraid of someone like Paul getting popular. I really think he’d make a lot of the economic Republicans leave for good. I’m about 1 presidential election cycle away from it.
“If is either”... I hate when I do that...
Never pass up a chance to bash the perfidious French . You will not have to wait very long until you are glad you did .
National poll? So he right where Dean was last year.
Don’t buy that kind of site/rating, as many of Paul’s, Tancredos, Hunters votes are ‘negative’ because they didn’t support the Republican vote because it was TOO LIBERAL and still increased the size & scope of the gov’t. If you look at their economic record BESIDES when Bush was in office you’d get a much clearer picture. Those 3 mentioned above voted against largess even when it meant voting with Dems (Dems wanted an even larger bill, they wanted a smaller one).
“my name is kbennkc , and I’m an idiot .”
Hi kbennkc! Meetings are every Friday at 7.
If the GOP nominates L.Ron Paul (stop laughing!), that is the end of the GOP. Ninety-plus percent of the party would move across the street and start a brand new party and the howling moonbat would be on his own.
Well, I can’t speak for Republicans..but I don’t fear Fred anymore then I fear any anti-war conspiracy theorist on the Left. We’ve been fighting them for years, what’s one more?
The problem for Paul is that most of the GOP base doesn’t agree with him. Thank God. Of course if he were a Dem, he wouldn’t be a novelty. He’d be lost in the crowd. So he’s kind of stuck, isn’t he? He’d get no traction on the left, and most of the right wouldn’t dream of electing him. if he’s lucky he might manage to rally Ralph Nader and Buchanon’s crowd. All 5% of the national electorate.
“I sincerely hope that all of you Thompson supporters are right.”
If we weren’t “right” we’d be Rudy rooters.
“Stop laughing”, you’re kidding right.
I love the “afraid of him” bit....
Probably. LOL
But a rare moment of sanity entered the electorate and Sarkozy was voted to office so I’m restraining myself for the time being.
Ah, gotcha. LOL
Okay...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.