Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Feinstein: Judge Mukasey has my vote
The Los Angeles Times ^ | November 3, 2007 | Dianne Feinstein

Posted on 11/03/2007 10:35:15 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued

During a long career in public service and private practice, Michael B. Mukasey has forged an independent path as a lawyer and federal judge. He has presided over 1,600 cases in almost 19 years on the bench. He has extensive experience on national security cases -- presiding over such critically important cases as U.S. vs. Rahman and Padilla vs. Bush. In the Omar Abdel Rahman case, 10 defendants were given prison sentences ranging from 25 years to life.

Judge Mukasey is not Alberto R. Gonzales. In our confirmation hearings (and subsequently, in writing), Judge Mukasey's answers to hundreds of questions were crisp and to the point, and reflected an independent mind. That's why I intend to vote to confirm him to be our next attorney general. I truly believe he will be a strong advocate for the American people.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 110th; doj; feinstein; mukasey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 11/03/2007 10:35:15 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; goldstategop; SandRat; fieldmarshaldj; LdSentinal; Norman Bates; janetgreen; ...

This is something of a surprise. Feinstein is a solid lib, though she occasionally breaks with her party on executive & judicial appointments.


2 posted on 11/03/2007 10:37:47 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Once in a while Senator Feinstein does something that makes me despise her less.
3 posted on 11/03/2007 10:38:46 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Romney Rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

I’m sure she’ll soon enough do something that’ll have you despising her more. COunt on it.


4 posted on 11/03/2007 10:40:03 AM PDT by supremedoctrine (The only thing sourdough bread is good for is a grilled cheese sandwich, For that it's essential/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Pretend to support conservative values because the next election is near Democrat.


5 posted on 11/03/2007 10:41:54 AM PDT by Son House ($$Proud Member of Vast Right Wing, Out To Lower Your Tax Rates For More Opportunities.$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

No surprise ... look at it this way, if they don’t vote for him, BUSH will take over the position f Attorney General. That scares them into voting FOR an AG. Bush is being clever here.


6 posted on 11/03/2007 10:46:01 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Mukasey is an old friend of Schumer’s ... Schumer is on record himself as acknowledging sometimes torture is appropriate ... Schumer HAD to vote for Muskasey, despite the split from the party orthodoxy .. Schumer needed a beard ... Feinstein fit the bill.

After the White House nominated Mukasey, one of the Jewish pubs I get put out an article about their great pride in Mukasey who, I think, might be the first Jewish AG when confirmed. So both Schumer and Feinstein had a secondary interest in his confirmation.

Not to mention, Mukasey appears to have been one helluva good judge. That alone would not have swayed their votes and seems to have had no impact with Leahy, Biden, Durbin, Fat Teddy. Speaking of whom, let us have one last good laugh at Fat Teddy claiming he won’t vote for Mukasey becaue he didn’t answer properly about water torture! No irony there!


7 posted on 11/03/2007 10:47:24 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Feinstein is a solid lib...

Maybe she is trying to make sure this doesn't come back to bite her.

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/29/difi-and-the-culture-of-corruption/

 

8 posted on 11/03/2007 10:52:42 AM PDT by txroadkill ( http://iraqstar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Why is she supporting him? She’s an ultra liberal leftist representing the most liberal leftist city. Is Muskasey an ultra liberal who’s wearing sheep’s cloting?


9 posted on 11/03/2007 11:00:36 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
She's supporting the judge in exchange for their not going after her for being on the military appropriations committee while her hubby reaps the benefits.

Tit for tat - nothing more. She has the principles of a sand flea.

10 posted on 11/03/2007 11:04:18 AM PDT by Lizavetta ( Politicians: When they're speaking, they're lying - when they're not speaking, they're stealing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

“This is something of a surprise. Feinstein is a solid lib, though she occasionally breaks with her party on executive & judicial appointments.”

Feinstein is a crook and everyone knows it. Her hubby also has the military contracts. She isn’t stupid.


11 posted on 11/03/2007 11:06:44 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

Feinstein has broken with her party before. She voted to confirm Jeffrey Sutton and Edward Southwick to the Federal courts.


12 posted on 11/03/2007 11:07:50 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
She's supporting the judge in exchange for their not going after her for being on the military appropriations committee while her hubby reaps the benefits.

Bingo! The correct answer. Shows that Bush and the Pubbies never learn.

13 posted on 11/03/2007 11:16:05 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (The hyphen American with the loudest whine gets the grease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I hear Chuckie Schumer is going to back him too.


14 posted on 11/03/2007 11:17:20 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Confirm Mukasey

Senators Leahy, Kennedy, etal are pandering to voters following secular orthodoxy equating discomfort and frustration with torture. Senators provide intellectual comfort to those demanding moral ambiguity for conflict outcome between civilized societies and Wahhabi jihadists. For liberal presbytery 9/11 events require moral ambiguity and redefinition to irrelevancy to sustain public serenity vital for acquiring and retaining power through political largesse. Defending serenity compels outrage over Mukasey’s testimony, notwithstanding codified terrorist citizenship attributes within Fifth, Eight and Fourteenth Constitutional amendments.

My Representative quotes statements from 20 former Army interrogators that prisoner/detainee abuse and torture should be avoided at all costs, while avoiding uncomfortable parallels that 2,000 to 200,000 American deaths cannot provoke urgencies the country must be protected at all costs. Against this asymmetrical homily, FBI Director Mueller describes a robust nuclear material and technology market. Fifty-year-old technologies reside worldwide for weapons such as Davy Crockett missiles that fired a 51-pound, 20-ton yield warhead, and Astor torpedoes that carried a Hiroshima size warhead. Yet our victory must remain wholly within interrogation processes seeking tranquil, self-created moral high ground defining national greatness. The Wahhabi jihadists define victory as our submission after elaborate, extensive slaughters. Given jihadists avoid our scenarios for legitimate conflict; they win by their definition. We perish, but win by ours.

Terrorists possessing unambiguous, malevolent intent are unresponsive to direct questioning and psychological gambits. Interrogators need the range of techniques applied to our own military in survival school. Unfortunately, our country’s survival has been tabled for Senate discussion.


15 posted on 11/03/2007 12:00:09 PM PDT by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Schumer and Feinstein both LOVE this guy....he was Schumer’s CHOICE......THAT makes me VERY nervous.


16 posted on 11/03/2007 12:03:33 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary '08...Her PHONINESS is REAL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
I am worried about Mukasey because Schumer recommended him. I cannot imagine Schumer recommending a conservative, certainly not being friends with a conservative. He is too far to the left and too frantic to pass amnesty.
17 posted on 11/03/2007 12:05:21 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

No suprise at all.

The one thing that can make DiFi and Chucky ignore their feigned concerns about ‘waterboarding’, is an assurance about not limiting abortion.

Bet on it!


18 posted on 11/03/2007 12:11:20 PM PDT by G Larry (HILLARY CARE = DYING IN LINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

DiFi has moved 1/2 mm to the right since she had that cozy flight on Air Force One recently with Bush going to Kalifornia to see the wild fires. After the flight, she basically said, “gee, Bush isn’t quite as big Dumbass as I thought. In fact, he knows a lot of sh!t!”


19 posted on 11/03/2007 12:11:25 PM PDT by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

The abortion issue is up to the Supreme Court, not the Attorney General. And in any event, little will happen with regard to abortion until after three of the liberal justices retire. Which is why this Presidential election is more important than most.

IMHO, Bush is a lame-duck President domestically, and the aging Mukasey is merely going to be a transition person between this administration and the next.


20 posted on 11/03/2007 12:14:22 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson