Skip to comments.
TWA 800 FOIA Suit Yields Smoking Gun
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| August 30, 2007
| Jack Cashill
Posted on 11/06/2007 9:21:21 AM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-176 next last
To: Apercu
Has the government ever explained why 747s worldwide were not grounded immediately after the TWA flight 800 crash to implement a center fuel tank fix - including Air Force One? When was the last time any class of airliners were ordered grounded immediately as a result of any crash? 727? 737? DC-10? L-1011? 757? 767? Any of them?
41
posted on
11/06/2007 10:25:18 AM PST
by
Non-Sequitur
(Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
To: purpleraine
Just out of curiousity. Where is Jamie Gorelick now?? President of some university? as are most Clintanoids (well those not prematurely deceased).
42
posted on
11/06/2007 10:25:46 AM PST
by
rod1
To: Perdogg
The whole TWA 800 investigation was a sham and stunk.
This leads one to the logical conclusion that there is a cover-up by the most corrupt CIC in the history of this country.
Time to have the Burglar take the polygraph and then waterboarded!
43
posted on
11/06/2007 10:28:18 AM PST
by
iopscusa
(El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
To: neverdem
This was a flight to Paris and the fuel tank was supposed to be empty or almost empty. It doesn't pass the smell test, IMHO. That same 747 had flown non-stop from Athens to New York that day. By comparison a flight from New York to Paris was a short hop and there is no reason why the center fuel tank should have been filled. If you're not going to need the fuel then why fill it and drag all that extra weight with you?
44
posted on
11/06/2007 10:28:22 AM PST
by
Non-Sequitur
(Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
To: JerseyDvl
It appears to document that some form of missile testing was taking place in the area just five days before the TWA 800 incident. I’m about 50/50 wondering if some group was going “Oh shit!” or “Praise be to Allah” on the 17th.
45
posted on
11/06/2007 10:30:47 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Mrs Crinton have Pay Feava. There she go now. "Ah Hsu Ahhh Hsu Ah Hsu!" Crintons worth every penny.)
To: neverdem
Tinfoil material.
Gheeeez!
It has already been established that tests in the area were being conducted by the military; so a video of evidence of it 5 days before the 747 crash is perfectly consistent and totally irrelevant.
Or did I miss something here?
46
posted on
11/06/2007 10:31:32 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: JerseyDvl
I should add, I’m 0% convinced that the center fuel tank blue due to some design flaw.
47
posted on
11/06/2007 10:31:38 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Mrs Crinton have Pay Feava. There she go now. "Ah Hsu Ahhh Hsu Ah Hsu!" Crintons worth every penny.)
To: iopscusa
I agree with the third sentence.
48
posted on
11/06/2007 10:33:58 AM PST
by
Perdogg
(Elections have consequences.)
To: Southack
The first attack is one thing to excuse...its the second launch that downed TWA 800 that should have had General Wesley Clarke and his peers fired.Moonbat logic.
The first launch (irrelevant) is on tape; the second (if it ever happened) is not.
Fevered fantasies or paranoia are not documentation.
49
posted on
11/06/2007 10:34:49 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: Publius6961
Or did I miss something here?Gorelick's history of selling us a bill of goods, who shot it down?
50
posted on
11/06/2007 10:37:24 AM PST
by
neverdem
(Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
To: iopscusa
What are your qualifications and experiences in investigating airline disasters and terrorist incidents?
51
posted on
11/06/2007 10:37:25 AM PST
by
Perdogg
(Elections have consequences.)
To: Non-Sequitur
I believe 737’s, 747’s & L1011’s have been grounded briefly for rudder control & engine problems. While F-15’s are military, no time was wasted on their grounding for non combat missions several days ago.Why so long to fix the center fuel tank on Air Force One? The point is, there are too many witnesses & the stench of Clinton cover up that make the final report very questionable.We will probably never know.
52
posted on
11/06/2007 10:37:50 AM PST
by
Apercu
("A man's character is his fate" - Heraclitus)
To: gaijin
Fishing trawlers dragging the harbor also found the MANPADS ejector can thats the rapid-burn thing that boosts the missile out of the launcher in such a way to provide for a launch that doesnt burn the terrorist.They probably found rocks, too. Doesn't prove that the 747 was "brought down" by rocks...
53
posted on
11/06/2007 10:38:19 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: DoughtyOne
I do not believe the center fuel tank theory either.
You would have a better chance of convincing me that someone was smoking next to the damn fuel tank.
It was certainly shot down in my opinion but why and by who will always remain a question.
54
posted on
11/06/2007 10:39:51 AM PST
by
JerseyDvl
(If You Support America - Thank a Soldier; If You Support Al-Qaeda - Thank a Democrat!)
To: Non-Sequitur
If you're not going to need the fuel then why fill it and drag all that extra weight with you?That makes sense with perfect fuel systems. So how come they are always dumping fuel before emergency landings?
55
posted on
11/06/2007 10:40:33 AM PST
by
neverdem
(Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
To: All
Has anyone read the book nightfall by Nelson Demille?
It is a great read and though fiction, it is based on this event and the subsequent investigation.
Like I said....it’s FICTION...but it is a good book that I recommend.
And boy, what an ending!!
56
posted on
11/06/2007 10:43:44 AM PST
by
JerseyDvl
(If You Support America - Thank a Soldier; If You Support Al-Qaeda - Thank a Democrat!)
To: Apercu
I believe 737s, 747s & L1011s have been grounded briefly for rudder control & engine problems. I've heard that individual airlines may have grounded their aircraft following an incident, but certainly in the case of the 747 and L-1011 I've never heard of a worldwide grounding.
57
posted on
11/06/2007 10:44:01 AM PST
by
Non-Sequitur
(Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
To: neverdem
That makes sense with perfect fuel systems. So how come they are always dumping fuel before emergency landings? Just at a guess, if you're trying to land in an emergency then you might want as little of the stuff that might burst into flames onboard as possible.
58
posted on
11/06/2007 10:45:26 AM PST
by
Non-Sequitur
(Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
To: Apercu
How about the Airbus grounding following the crash in NY a couple weeks after Sept 11?
59
posted on
11/06/2007 10:45:58 AM PST
by
zek157
To: NY Attitude
We should ask Jim Kalstrom, he will tell us the truth. Sarcasm on!.............
Yes! this one guy that knows where the “skeletons” are hidden
60
posted on
11/06/2007 10:46:20 AM PST
by
thinking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-176 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson