Posted on 11/06/2007 5:35:04 PM PST by mdittmar
Four powerful lawmakers are working on a new Iraq plan for the Democratic Congress in the hope it will reignite the war debate as soon as this week.
Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) said the new legislation might include interim “bridge funds” providing partial military funding for the Iraq war as well as a mandate to change the mission of the U.S. military to counterterrorism and other operations. He also said it could include a goal of completing a troop withdrawal within nine months.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) says the basis of the plan is identical to previous bills moved by the Democratic majority, such as the withdrawal plan that the House passed in July and the war supplemental that President Bush vetoed in May.
“It will resemble what we have done before,” Pelosi said at a press conference today. “‘The same’ is pretty different than what the president wants.”
In an interview, Hoyer quipped, “If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.”
Democrats hope they will win GOP support for ending the war by tying restrictions to funding, and by switching a mandate for withdrawing troops with a less stringent goal for withdrawal. Language to require a nine-month withdrawal was included in an amendment previously offered by Sens. Carl Levin (Mich.) and Jack Reed (R.I.), but it was rejected by a 47-47 vote in September.
In addition, if Democrats come up short in their latest attempt to influence Iraq policy, it will allow them to blame Republicans for again blocking a change in the course of the unpopular war as they head home for the two-week recess.
The strategy is risky, however, since it would also allow Republicans to argue that Democrats are stalling progress on a host of legislative matters as they pursue Iraq policies that are sure to fall short of the 60 needed to break a filibuster, much less the two-thirds majority needed in both chambers to override a presidential veto.
Levin, who participated in lengthy leadership negotiations over Iraq policy last week, said he didn’t want to announce what his party’s leadership is planning to unveil, but said there has been “an approach that has been basically agreed upon.”
He said the package may include interim bridge funds “with certain strings attached,” as well as a softer version of the defeated Levin-Reed amendment.
Levin said Congress would take up another bridge fund at a later time, which likely signals that Democrats are in no hurry to act on President Bush’s nearly $200 billion fiscal 2008 war supplemental funding request.
Democratic leaders are not seeking input from the most avidly anti-war legislators in the Out of Iraq caucus, where lawmakers are growing frustrated with inaction on Iraq.
“I’m frustrated that while we drift, our troops are being killed and injured,” said Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.), a co-founder of the Out of Iraq caucus.
Pelosi acknowledged the frustration Tuesday, saying, “If there’s anything I’ve been disappointed in, it’s been that failure” to end the war. Asked why she doesn’t end the war on her own, she said, “Would that I had that power.”
Reed said he expected the approach to be resolved in the “next couple of days. . . . It’s not like we can put these decisions off any longer.”
Speaking with reporters after Tuesday’s Democratic policy luncheon, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) punted when asked about his plans to take up a bridge fund.
“Before we get any bridge fund, we have to talk about what we’re going to do this week,” Reid said, pointing to the current farm bill on the floor and plans to take up a massive bill that would fund the departments of Veterans Affairs, Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education.
Reid said the Senate will soon tackle an appropriations bill for the Defense Department, which includes a continuing resolution to keep the government operating through Dec. 14. That bill is silent on Iraq-withdrawal language, making the bridge fund for Iraq the next likely vehicle for a debate over the war.
When asked if the Senate would debate Iraq before Thanksgiving, Reid said: “We’ll have to see.”
Same ugly Surrender Pig, they’re just trying to find a different dress to put it in.
They’re going to grab the rail again.
Any plan that includes victory will be overlooked I am sure.
Make my day.
The traitors are shuffling the cards and trying again.
Time for a Bush speech:
The coalition’s success in Iraq is driving partisan’s in the Senate to undermine our ability to complete our mission.
It is shamefull that these partisans believe that by investing in America’s defeat, they can extend their political power.
Indeed I would love to hear Bush address them like the traitors they are. You’d do a much better job at writing speeches for him.
When I read “powerful democrats” I immediately flashed to Wiley Coyote hatching yet another plan to catch roadrunner...we all know how this one is going to turn out too, don’t we ?
ping
Why doesn’t the GOP seize control like they just did with that rediculous Cheney impeachment debacle. They need to introduce legislation that commends the troop surge as the right approach and pledge to support General Patreus action in Iraq. The GOP could include language that agrees that as the success of the surge continues to take hold the mission will continued to be turned over to Iraq security forces with more and more troops returning home... tie in a basing infrastructure to that.. kinda like the Marshall plan and WALAH... Let the Democrats go on the defensive it will force them to no support part of what they want.
Strategy 1: Cut
Strategy 2: Run
Isn't that one of the definitions of insanity?
Exactly. Their impotence is almost comical if it weren’t for their treason.
No.
They are going to order the Acme Impeachment Rocket, strap it to Nancy’s back and when Bush goes zooming by, light the fuse and she’ll blast right into a mountain side—— KABLOOIE !!!
(Response stolen from a Yahoo friend!)
OK Adobe Experts...
We need a graphic of Wiley E. Pelosi with the Impeachment Rocket strapped to her back!
Slightly off thread, but in keeping with your post...I heard an interesting observation from someone a week ago: if Wiley Coyote had all this money to buy those ACME products to try and catch the Roadrunner...why didn't he just order dinner?
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
As more weapons seized, roadside bombings at three-year low
http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=50089
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.