Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Johnston Intruder Pinned by Car Dies (Deliberately rammed by man protecting his property)
WRAL-TV (Raleigh, NC) ^ | 11/9/07 | WRAL

Posted on 11/09/2007 9:21:36 AM PST by SergeiRachmaninov

Selma — An intruder who police say was pinned between a car and a fence has died at the hospital.

John Reid said he pulled into his driveway near the intersection of Hawkins Road and U.S. Highway 301 between Micro and Selma Thursday afternoon when he noticed two men getting into a brown sedan outside a gate on his property.

Reid, whose property had been burglarized several times in the past year, said he did not want the pair to escape.

(Excerpt) Read more at wral.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: intruder; johnston
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last
There is a fascinating (and unfortunate) 911 call from Mr. Reid linked at the story. Sheriff has said that his first take is that Mr. Reid committed no crime. I am guessing that his opinion will not prevail, although I personally would bitterly hate to see Mr. Reid do any time for this. These cases arise from time to time, but this seems a particular interesting one with the things said in the 911 call, the perps already being outside the fence, etc.
1 posted on 11/09/2007 9:21:37 AM PST by SergeiRachmaninov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SergeiRachmaninov
A necessary ingredient: " Investigators found a stolen piece of machinery belonging to Reid into the back of the sedan. "

Case closed.

2 posted on 11/09/2007 9:25:38 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll. <br> "What happens if neutrinos have mass?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SergeiRachmaninov
I would hope he lived long enough to name who helped him rob this person property.
3 posted on 11/09/2007 9:25:41 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SergeiRachmaninov

Wow. I hate to sound like a lib but lethal force is not called for when “protecting your property”. Only in self defense or justifiably perceived threat of personal harm!
Almost everyone knows “you cant shoot someone unless they break into your house” and even that doesn’t hold up in court these days. If you are going to use your car to ram someone just to ‘stop them from getting away’, then you might have to expect to do some prison time if that person dies. I understand they MAY have been committing a crime.


4 posted on 11/09/2007 9:25:55 AM PST by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SergeiRachmaninov

Not wanting somebody to get away is not considered grounds for justified use of deadly force. Mr. Reid was not being threatened in any way. It is likely that he’s in a lot of trouble.


5 posted on 11/09/2007 9:26:39 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SergeiRachmaninov

-bflr-


6 posted on 11/09/2007 9:26:46 AM PST by rellimpank (--we need a special font for <b>SARCASM</b>--NRA benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z3n

Several states have passed “Shoot the burglar” laws. If someone breaks into your house you can shoot them in the act whether or not they threaten you. In Florida, homeowners are exempt from civil liability.


7 posted on 11/09/2007 9:29:03 AM PST by CholeraJoe (Be unique. It makes it easier for the rest of us to identify the morons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

I agree.


8 posted on 11/09/2007 9:29:13 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: z3n

In Texas we have the right to protect our property with deadly force in case of “theft by night”, but that is here and he is there.

Sad to say this fellow is toast and the perps family will more than likely be living in his house via a hefty lawsuit while he is in the pokey. Evil won this one.


9 posted on 11/09/2007 9:29:23 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

The fact also that they were already off his property would more than likely negate your right in Texas as well.


10 posted on 11/09/2007 9:30:18 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SergeiRachmaninov

Sometimes one’s luck just runs out.


11 posted on 11/09/2007 9:30:34 AM PST by Paladin2 (We don't fix the problem, we fix the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SergeiRachmaninov

In most places and cases, you can’t use deadly force to stop a property crime... and using a car is deadly force, since the weight alone can crush a person (and clearly, in this case, the suspect died).


12 posted on 11/09/2007 9:31:09 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SergeiRachmaninov
Add to the mix: black "victim" of a white guy; Sharpton, et al leading protests about it being "open season on black folks, etc.

If Reid is tried, he should plead insanity-in the heat of the moment he "lost all resason", etc.

13 posted on 11/09/2007 9:31:45 AM PST by Sans-Culotte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
Reid said he tried to block the sedan in with his truck........Brown was pinned between the car and a gate post....was airlifted to Duke University Hospital, where he later died.

Truck control! Truck control!

14 posted on 11/09/2007 9:32:37 AM PST by cowboyway (My heroes have always been Cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

In this case, the perps not only weren’t in his house, they weren’t even on his property.


15 posted on 11/09/2007 9:32:44 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: z3n

In some states, there exist laws that give homeowners the legal presumption of “reasonable fear” when the homeowner is inside the home and someone breaks into the house.

To my knowledge (and IANAL), Texas is the only state where lethal force may be used to protect property.

It pays to talk to a lawyer (or better yet, a DA) about the laws in one’s state about the use of force (lethal or otherwise) before a need arises to use it.


16 posted on 11/09/2007 9:33:32 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: z3n
Johnston County Sheriff Steve Bizzell said Thursday no final determination has been made, but it was unlikely Reid will be charged. "I don't think John Reid has done anything wrong..." Bizzell said.

Looks like the law doesn't agree with you.

17 posted on 11/09/2007 9:33:42 AM PST by LibWhacker (Democrats are phony Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
In this case, the perps not only weren’t in his house, they weren’t even on his property.

I'm not sure if that is true.

They were outside his gate, but I'd say there is a good chance they were still on his property. Not sure if "on property" or "outside gate" either one matter, in this case.

18 posted on 11/09/2007 9:35:23 AM PST by SergeiRachmaninov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: z3n

Well, in Texas, if someone is breaking and entering, or on your property in the process of doing so, you can legal defend your property with lethal force...as well you should be able to. Someone coming onto your property to steal your belongings MUST be considered as a mortal threat to your person.


19 posted on 11/09/2007 9:35:49 AM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: z3n

Why shouldn’t lethal force be used to protect property? Many people rely on their property to make a living, and need to keep it. They cannot afford weeks of lost income while trying to convince an insurer to pay for what was stolen (which may never happen, if the theft cannot be proven because the thief got away), nor lawyers to bring civil suit against the perp to a) try to convince a judge that the perp took the property, and b) try to collect on a judgement.

ALL crime should be stopped in progress when it is detected in progress. A consistent policy of doing this would greatly change the reasoning processes of people considering committing crimes, in large part because they wouldn’t be operating within a social group consisted almost entirely of people who had committed brazen crimes and gotten away with them.


20 posted on 11/09/2007 9:37:06 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson