Posted on 11/09/2007 12:43:30 PM PST by neverdem
You could change the date on this headline 56 times over the last year alone. The anti American rat keeps trying to get us to surrender and Americans don’t want to surrender.
It won’t be long before the Dem leadership in the House throw the net over Pulosi. The victory in Iraq cannot be hidden. They lose everything next November.
And how many do you really need to fight terrorism in Iraq? 1000? 1500? All of them there now and then some?
Yeah, John, you can pass it in the House that way and watch it die a slow death in the Senate. Even Dusty Harry admitted as much when he said:
"When asked whether that was possible, considering the thin majority Democrats hold in the Senate, Reid said it "is up to the White House and up to the Republicans."
Translation: We can't do sh*t without the Republicans
I say we take up a collection to buy a few cruise missles to visit Qom, Mecca, & Medina for starters.
Bush will keep sending it back until the provision of troop withdraw is removed....because we know the Dems don’t have the stones to pull funding.
Forgive me for saying so, but it looks like ol' Peloser is stuck between Iraq and a hard place...
Folks, I am very concerned. The Democrats may be, in their craven evaluations, finally realizing that they are funding victory, and that victory could destroy them next year.
They truly face a situation where they must make a choice of funding victory that humiliates them during the campaign, or they cut off funds altogether and risk any backlash about not supporting troops in battle. They may indeed choose the latter. That is a risk of unknown magnitude vs the magnitude of humiliation they are beginning to see is certain as victory in Iraq unfolds.
The GOP can talk about this victory non stop and it may not matter. The Democrats may decide that they dare not fund it because it will cost them the election. How does Hillary respond to an opponent in the debates who turns to her and says
The People Remember Who Pimped Surrender.
The Democrats are terrified of that scenario, and in their little world of contorted mindset, the best interests of the country are served by them staying in power even if it means surrender. They can talk around surrender and blame it all on Bush, but they cannot talk around victory.
They are in trouble, and so are we. We DESPERATELY need another increment of money to secure victory. Their base may not let them give it to us.
What does she think they are doing there now?
They *are* "fighting terrorists, training Iraqi security forces, and protecting U.S. assets. Oh they are also building hospitals and schools, water supply systems and power generation/distrubtion systems. She wants to stop those sort of "for the children" activities? Hmm... Worst case of BDS yet.
The problem being there are plenty of Sh*tty RINOS in the Senate, who might just go along with something like this.
Owen,
You captured the democRat predicament quite well. They have successfully painted themselves in a corner. If the country wins, they lose. If the US loses, they lose.
No chance, not even one.
They got what they voted for, leaders who are about as moronic as can be possible.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
They are desperate to do something that looks like they are in charge.
Apparently, there is an objective number. What is it?
A Cessna 337 powered by DNC fuel.
The 337 is nicknamed the "To me come from me" and the "push pull" via it's propulsion it incorporates.
A fitting name for the DNC these day's.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.